Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging is an established non-invasive imaging test for detection of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). Fully automated quantitative perfusion CMR (QP CMR) is a new technical advancement, which offers measurement of myocardial blood flow in CMR. Additionally, recent innovations have introduced various contrast-agent-free methods for CAD assessment, such as stress T1 mapping reactivity (∆T1) and oxygen-sensitive CMR (OS CMR). These methods might eliminate the necessity for contrast administration in clinical practice, simplifying, reducing time, invasiveness and costs in evaluating patients with suspected obstructive CAD. The ADVOCATE-CMR study aims to validate QP CMR, ∆T1 and OS CMR imaging against invasive fractional flow reserve (FFR) for detection of obstructive CAD. The study also aims to head-to-head compare the diagnostic accuracy of these CMR techniques with the conventional visual assessment of stress perfusion CMR and to correlate them to short- and long-term clinical outcomes.
Study design: Single-center, observational, prospective, cross-sectional cohort study performed at the Amsterdam University Medical Centers - Location VUmc.
Study population: 182 symptomatic patients with suspected obstructive CAD (without a previous CAD history), scheduled for invasive coronary angiography (ICA) according to the decision of the treating clinician.
Methods:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Diagnostic accuracy of QP CMR (stress myocardial blood flow [MBF], stress relative MBF [rMBF], myocardial perfusion reserve [MPR] and relative MPR [rMPR]) to detect obstructive CAD, as defined by FFR | Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, area under the curve (AUC), positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) | ICA + hemodynamic measurements within 6 weeks of the initial CMR scan |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Diagnostic accuracy of ΔT1 to detect obstructive CAD, as defined by FFR | Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, AUC, PPV, NPV | ICA + hemodynamic measurements within 6 weeks of the initial CMR scan |
| Diagnostic accuracy of OS CMR (breathing-induced myocardial oxygenation reserve; B-MORE) to detect obstructive CAD, as defined by FFR |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Diagnostic accuracies of QP CMR (stress MBF, stress rMBF, MPR and rMPR), ΔT1 and B-MORE to detect microvascular dysfunction (MVD), as defined by CFR | Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, AUC, PPV, NPV | ICA + hemodynamic measurements within 6 weeks of the initial CMR scan |
| Diagnostic accuracy of QP CMR (stress MBF, stress rMBF, MPR and rMPR), ΔT1 and B-MORE to differentiate between MVD (as defined by CFR) and 3-vessel obstructive CAD |
Inclusion criteria:
Exclusion criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
182 symptomatic patients with suspected obstructive CAD (without a previous CAD history), scheduled for invasive coronary angiography according to the decision of the treating clinician.
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003324 | Coronary Artery Disease |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003327 | Coronary Disease |
| D017202 | Myocardial Ischemia |
| D006331 | Heart Diseases |
| D002318 | Cardiovascular Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, AUC, PPV, NPV |
| ICA + hemodynamic measurements within 6 weeks of the initial CMR scan |
| Head-to-head comparison of diagnostic accuracies of QP CMR (stress MBF, stress rMBF, MPR, rMPR), ΔT1, OS CMR (B-MORE) and conventional visual assessment of GBCA-based first pass perfusion imaging to detect obstructive CAD, as defined by FFR | Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, AUC, PPV, NPV | ICA + hemodynamic measurements within 6 weeks of the initial CMR scan |
| Diagnostic accuracy of QP CMR (stress MBF, stress rMBF, MPR and rMPR) to detect obstructive CAD, as defined by iFR and resting Pd/Pa | Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, AUC, PPV, NPV | ICA + hemodynamic measurements within 6 weeks of the initial CMR scan |
| Diagnostic accuracy of ΔT1 to detect obstructive CAD, as defined by iFR and resting Pd/Pa | Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, AUC, PPV, NPV | ICA + hemodynamic measurements within 6 weeks of the initial CMR scan |
| Diagnostic accuracy of OS CMR (B-MORE) to detect obstructive CAD, as defined by iFR and resting Pd/Pa | Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, AUC, PPV, NPV | ICA + hemodynamic measurements within 6 weeks of the initial CMR scan |
| Head-to-head comparison of diagnostic accuracies of QP CMR (stress MBF, stress rMBF, MPR, rMPR), ΔT1, OS CMR (B-MORE) and conventional visual assessment of first pass perfusion imaging to detect obstructive CAD, as defined by iFR and resting Pd/Pa | Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, AUC, PPV, NPV | ICA + hemodynamic measurements within 6 weeks of the initial CMR scan |
| Relation of stress and rest MBF and rMBF, MPR and rMPR, ΔT1 and B-MORE to Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ)-7 Summary score | Before ICA and 3, 6 months, 1 and 3 years after the ICA (or revascularization if applicable) |
| Relation of stress and rest MBF and rMBF, MPR and rMPR, ΔT1 and B-MORE to SAQ-7 Angina Frequency score | Before ICA and 3, 6 months, 1 and 3 years after the ICA (or revascularization if applicable) |
| Relation of stress and rest MBF and rMBF, MPR and rMPR, ΔT1 and B-MORE to SAQ-7 Physical Limitation score | Before ICA and 3, 6 months, 1 and 3 years after the ICA (or revascularization if applicable) |
| Relation of stress and rest MBF and rMBF, MPR and rMPR, ΔT1 and B-MORE to SAQ-7 Quality of Life score | Before ICA and 3, 6 months, 1 and 3 years after the ICA (or revascularization if applicable) |
| Relation of stress and rest MBF and rMBF, MPR and rMPR, ΔT1 and B-MORE to Rose Dyspnea Scale score | Before ICA and 3, 6 months, 1 and 3 years after the ICA (or revascularization if applicable) |
| Prognostic value of QP CMR (stress MBF, stress rMBF, MPR and rMPR), stress T1 mapping reactivity and OS CMR (B-MORE) |
| 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 3 years |
Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, AUC, PPV, NPV |
| ICA + hemodynamic measurements within 6 weeks of the initial CMR scan |
| Change in stress MBF after revascularization | Difference between stress MBF before revascularization (baseline) and after revascularization (in ml/g/min) | ICA + hemodynamic measurements within 6 weeks of the initial CMR scan |
| Change in MPR after revascularization | Difference between MPR before revascularization (baseline) and after revascularization | ICA + hemodynamic measurements within 6 weeks of the initial CMR scan |
| Change in stress T1 mapping after revascularization | Difference between stress T1 mapping before revascularization (baseline) and after revascularization (in ms) | ICA + hemodynamic measurements within 6 weeks of the initial CMR scan |
| Change in ΔT1 after revascularization | Difference between ΔT1 before revascularization (baseline) and after revascularization | ICA + hemodynamic measurements within 6 weeks of the initial CMR scan |
| Change in B-MORE after revascularization | Difference between B-MORE before revascularization (baseline) and after revascularization (in %) | ICA + hemodynamic measurements within 6 weeks of the initial CMR scan |
| Costs of QP CMR, stress T1 mapping reactivity and OS CMR compared to ICA | CMR and following ICA + hemodynamic measurements within 6 weeks of the initial CMR scan |
| Procedural time of QP CMR, stress T1 mapping reactivity and OS CMR compared to ICA | CMR and following ICA + hemodynamic measurements within 6 weeks of the initial CMR scan |
| D001161 |
| Arteriosclerosis |
| D001157 | Arterial Occlusive Diseases |
| D014652 | Vascular Diseases |