Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| R44MH132202 | U.S. NIH Grant/Contract | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) | NIH |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study will test a new cognitive-behavioral skills training program (CBI) delivered in the metaverse. Although initial evidence suggested CBI was feasible for individuals experiencing depression or anxiety, CBI's effectiveness compared to no intervention has yet to be determined. The intervention may be delivered through virtual reality as well as flat-screen devices, such as a computer, which may also affect CBI's effectiveness.
The study will enroll up to 306 participants with depression. One third of the participants will access CBI through virtual reality, one third of the participants will access CBI through a flat-screen device, and one third of the participants will be asked not to attend CBI sessions for the first 8 weeks of participation of the trial. For both CBI conditions, treatment will be provided over 8 weeks, with a 6-month follow-up period. Enrollment will be ongoing and groups will occur simultaneously.
Potential participants are asked to complete an initial screening and an intake evaluation to determine eligibility. They will then receive 8-weeks of treatment. Participants will complete brief weekly self-report questionnaires throughout their time in the study.
Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is one of the most effective tools for the treatment of depression and anxiety. Despite its many strengths, CBT-based clinical care is often very expensive and difficult to access. To address problems of accessibility, the field is increasingly utilizing lay therapists (also commonly referred to as coaches or peers) to provide cognitive behavioral coaching. There is also accumulating evidence indicating that technology can be used to deliver affordable and accessible treatments with outcomes comparable to traditional face-to-face psychotherapy treatments (Karyotaki et al., 2021). In particular, the metaverse (Internet-connected 3-D virtual environments have also that allow end-users to interact as avatars) may be a distinctively powerful medium through which to deliver engaging, affordable, accessible, and scalable mental health interventions. In addition, the use of social virtual reality (VR) mental health interventions is relatively unexplored, yet the sense of presence ("being there") it provides may be useful to increase immersiveness in a digital intervention or facilitate social interaction in a digital space.
Therefore, the investigators plan to conduct a randomized controlled trial on CBI in order to investigate its effectiveness among different groups of people and investigate the role immersive VR, as opposed to a flat screen, may play in predicting outcome measures. Upon joining the study, participants are asked to complete surveys once a week for 8 weeks and brief monthly follow-up surveys for 6 months. If you are randomized to either of the CBI conditions, you will also be asked to attend 8 weekly 1-hour sessions through a virtual application (from a VR headset or flat-screen, depending on your condition). This study seeks to address the main following research questions: (1) Is CBI efficacious? (and for whom is it more or less efficacious?) And (2) Does immersive VR confer any advantage over and above accessing CBI via less immersive flat screen devices?
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| CBI-Virtual Reality | Active Comparator | Over 8 weekly 1-hour sessions, participants will learn about the cognitive-behavioral model from trained peer coaches, develop cognitive-behavioral skills that they can utilize in their daily lives (such as cognitive restructuring), and engage with a receptive community of peers. Participants randomized to this arm will access these sessions using a virtual reality headset. |
|
| CBI-Flat Screen | Active Comparator | Over 8 weekly 1-hour sessions, participants will learn about the cognitive-behavioral model from trained peer coaches, develop cognitive-behavioral skills and habits that they can utilize in their daily lives (such as cognitive restructuring), and engage with a receptive community of peers. Participants randomized to this arm will access these sessions using a flat-screen device, such as a computer. |
|
| Delayed-Access Control | No Intervention | Participants randomized to this arm will be asked not to attend CBI sessions. |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CBI | Behavioral | CBI sessions follow a detailed manual to teach a group of peers cognitive and behavioral strategies that they may utilize in their daily lives, often based around the cognitive-behavioral model as a teaching tool. CBI aims to develop cognitive-behaviorally-based skills and habits in participants, such as behavioral activation, mood tracking, the identification and reframing of automatic thoughts, and assertion training. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) | The PHQ-9 (Kroenke et al., 2001) is a 9-item self-report measure with strong psychometric properties that mirrors the nine criteria for evaluating whether someone meets criteria for major depressive disorder (MDD) in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual Fourth Edition (DSM-IV; American Psychiatric Association, 1994). Scores range from 0 to 27, with higher scores indicating great symptom severity. | Post-treatment (8-weeks) and follow-up (6-months) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Generalized Anxiety Disorder Questionnaire (GAD-7) | The GAD-7 (Spitzer et al., 2006) is a 7-item self-report measure with strong psychometric properties based on the diagnostic criteria for Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7) from the DSM-IV (American Psychiatric Association, 1994). Scores range from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating great symptom severity. | Post-treatment (8-weeks) and follow-up (6-months) |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Iony D Ezawa, PhD | University of Southern California | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University of Southern California | Los Angeles | California | 90089 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 33471111 | Background | Karyotaki E, Efthimiou O, Miguel C, Bermpohl FMG, Furukawa TA, Cuijpers P; Individual Patient Data Meta-Analyses for Depression (IPDMA-DE) Collaboration; Riper H, Patel V, Mira A, Gemmil AW, Yeung AS, Lange A, Williams AD, Mackinnon A, Geraedts A, van Straten A, Meyer B, Bjorkelund C, Knaevelsrud C, Beevers CG, Botella C, Strunk DR, Mohr DC, Ebert DD, Kessler D, Richards D, Littlewood E, Forsell E, Feng F, Wang F, Andersson G, Hadjistavropoulos H, Christensen H, Ezawa ID, Choi I, Rosso IM, Klein JP, Shumake J, Garcia-Campayo J, Milgrom J, Smith J, Montero-Marin J, Newby JM, Breton-Lopez J, Schneider J, Vernmark K, Bucker L, Sheeber LB, Warmerdam L, Farrer L, Heinrich M, Huibers MJH, Kivi M, Kraepelien M, Forand NR, Pugh N, Lindefors N, Lintvedt O, Zagorscak P, Carlbring P, Phillips R, Johansson R, Kessler RC, Brabyn S, Perini S, Rauch SL, Gilbody S, Moritz S, Berger T, Pop V, Kaldo V, Spek V, Forsell Y. Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Depression: A Systematic Review and Individual Patient Data Network Meta-analysis. JAMA Psychiatry. 2021 Apr 1;78(4):361-371. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2020.4364. | |
| 11556941 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003863 | Depression |
| D001008 | Anxiety Disorders |
| D003866 | Depressive Disorder |
| D001523 | Mental Disorders |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001526 | Behavioral Symptoms |
| D001519 | Behavior |
| D019964 | Mood Disorders |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| WHO Quality of Life-Brief (QOL) | The WHO QOL (Whoqol Group, 1998) is a 26-item self-report cross-cultural measure of quality of life within the domains of physical health, psychological health, social relationships, and environment. During the follow-up period, we will transition to using only the first item of the measure assessing overall quality of life. Scores are transformed on a scale from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating a higher quality of life. | Post-treatment (8-weeks) and 1-item version at follow-up (6-months) |
| Background |
| Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med. 2001 Sep;16(9):606-13. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x. |
| 16717171 | Background | Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JB, Lowe B. A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Arch Intern Med. 2006 May 22;166(10):1092-7. doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092. |
| 40327374 | Derived | Robinson N, Ramos FN, Hollon SD, Han GT, Ezawa ID. Cognitive Behavioral Immersion for Depression: Protocol for a Three-Arm Randomized Controlled Trial of Peer-Based Coaching in the Metaverse. JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 May 6;14:e65970. doi: 10.2196/65970. |