Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Background: Hemiplegic shoulder pain is one of the most common complications after a stroke. There are many treatment strategies for this complication. High-intensity laser therapy (HILT) is a new treatment option, and we aimed to compare the effectiveness of conventional electrotherapy agents and HILT in this study.
Patients and methods: Participants (N = 42) were randomized into the HILT (n = 21) and TENS+US (n = 21) groups. Group 1 received 3 sessions of HILT per week for 3 weeks in addition to a therapeutic exercise program that performed 5 sessions per week for 3 weeks. Group 2 received conventional physical therapy and a therapeutic exercise program for HSP of 5 sessions per week for 3 weeks. Patients were assessed before and after treatment on the on the 6th week for radiological evaluation with ultrasonography and for clinical parameters with VAS, AMAT, MRS, and FIQ scores.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| group 1: high intensive laser | Experimental | HILT was applied 3 times per week, totaling 9 sessions for three weeks. |
|
| group 2: TENS+Ultrasound | Experimental | tens+us used combined. 5 times per week. total 15 sessions for three weeks |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| high intensity laser | Device | 3 times per week, for 9 sessions |
| |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| visual analog scale | pain level, between 0-10, 0 is no pain, 10 is very severe pain | before treatment(baseline), after treatment |
| arm motor ability test | this scale asses the upper extremity motor function improvement and daily living activity level , between 0 is the worst score, mean is cant do/use, 5 is the best score.(between 0-5) | before treatment(baseline), after treatment |
| functional indepandance measures | functional capacity assessment scale;and despite indepandance of daily living activity 0-126, high score is better function | before treatment(baseline), after treatment |
| modified ranking scale | determines the patient's addiction level and evaluates disability; the score is between 0 and 6, where 0 is complete well-being, 5 is very severe disorder and 6 is full dependency | before treatment(baseline), after treatment |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| ultrasonographic imaging | muscle-skeletal ultrasonographic imaging;ultrasonographic findings; SA-SD bursitis, Bicipital tenosynovitis, Tendinosis, Cortical irregularity, Partial rupture, Total rupture, ACJ joint hypertrophy, Calcific tendinitis. | before treatment(baseline), after treatment |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ankara City Hospital | Ankara | Çankaya | 06800 | Turkey (Türkiye) |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D006429 | Hemiplegia |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010243 | Paralysis |
| D009461 | Neurologic Manifestations |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| tens+us |
| Device |
5 times per week, total 15 sessions for 3 weeks |
|
| D013568 |
| Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |