Was Lev perceived as creditable by healthcare workers using Treatment and Credibility Scale . Four items for credibility and one for expectation on a 10 point Likert scale where higher values indicate higher credibility.

Treatment satisfaction will be evaluated after session 1 using a modified version of the Evaluation Questionnaire including 5 levels where higher levels indicate higher satisfaction.

After the meeting today, my knowledge of how I can change my lifestyle have increased.

I will benefit from what we talked about during the meeting today The content of the meeting felt relevant based on my own experiences I understood the advice and strategies I was given that will help my change mine lifestyle habits I feel confident in how to use the advice and strategies I will use the advice and strategies I was listened to, the therapist understood my situation I was involved and helped to come up with suggestions for how I can reach my goals Is there something else you would like to add?

Treatment satisfaction will be evaluated after session 2 using a modified version of the Evaluation Questionnaire including 5 levels where higher levels indicate higher satisfaction.

After the meeting today, my knowledge of how I can change my lifestyle have increased.

I will benefit from what we talked about during the meeting today The content of the meeting felt relevant based on my own experiences I understood the advice and strategies I was given that will help my change mine lifestyle habits I feel confident in how to use the advice and strategies I will use the advice and strategies I was listened to, the therapist understood my situation I was involved and helped to come up with suggestions for how I can reach my goals Is there something else you would like to add?

Treatment satisfaction will be evaluated after session 3 using a modified version of the Evaluation Questionnaire including 5 levels where higher levels indicate higher satisfaction.

After the meeting today, my knowledge of how I can change my lifestyle have increased.

I will benefit from what we talked about during the meeting today The content of the meeting felt relevant based on my own experiences I understood the advice and strategies I was given that will help my change mine lifestyle habits I feel confident in how to use the advice and strategies I will use the advice and strategies I was listened to, the therapist understood my situation I was involved and helped to come up with suggestions for how I can reach my goals Is there something else you would like to add?

Treatment satisfaction will be evaluated after booster session using a modified version of the Evaluation Questionnaire including 5 levels where higher levels indicate higher satisfaction.

After the meeting today, my knowledge of how I can change my lifestyle have increased.

I will benefit from what we talked about during the meeting today The content of the meeting felt relevant based on my own experiences I understood the advice and strategies I was given that will help my change mine lifestyle habits I feel confident in how to use the advice and strategies I will use the advice and strategies I was listened to, the therapist understood my situation I was involved and helped to come up with suggestions for how I can reach my goals Is there something else you would like to add?

Treatment satisfaction will be evaluated after competing the three sessions using Patient Evaluation Questionnaire including 5 levels where higher levels indicate higher satisfaction.

As a whole, the Lev has been clearly focused on how I can live healthier My knowledge of how I can have healthier habits has increased I can better deal with problems connected to my health-related habits I have had the opportunity to contribute opinions during the Lev I would consider participating in a similar interventions in the future The participants also rated the course as a whole following the school grading system ''Failed,'' ''Passed,'' ''Passed with distinction,'' and ''Passed with special

Treatment satisfaction will be evaluated after competing the whole intervention using Patient Evaluation Questionnaire including 5 levels where higher levels indicate higher satisfaction.

As a whole, the Lev has been clearly focused on how I can live healthier My knowledge of how I can have healthier habits has increased I can better deal with problems connected to my health-related habits I have had the opportunity to contribute opinions during the Lev I would consider participating in a similar interventions in the future The participants also rated the course as a whole following the school grading system ''Failed,'' ''Passed,'' ''Passed with distinction,'' and ''Passed with special

The treatment satisfaction questionnaire also included open questions that will be analyses using a qualitative thematic approach including the following questions:

I feel that participating in Lev helped me in these ways How could the Lev have been better? What could I have done differently myself? Is there anything else you would like to add? A qualitative, thematic analysis will be performed to identify more general themes. There is not a template or scale to extract the themes. One rater suggest categories based on the similarity of answers. Another rater organizes the answers in the suggested themes. To be considered a theme, there must be over 85% similarity between raters.

I would consider participating in a similar interventions in the future The participants also rated the course as a whole following the school grading system ''Failed,'' ''Passed,'' ''Passed with distinction,'' and ''Passed with special

The treatment satisfaction questionnaire also included open questions that will be analyses using a qualitative thematic approach including the following questions:

I feel that participating in Lev helped me in these ways How could the Lev have been better? What could I have done differently myself? Is there anything else you would like to add? A qualitative, thematic analysis will be performed to identify more general themes. There is not a template or scale to extract the themes. One rater suggest categories based on the similarity of answers. Another rater organizes the answers in the suggested themes. To be considered a theme, there must be over 85% similarity between raters.

I would consider participating in a similar interventions in the future.

The participants also rated the course as a whole following the school grading system ''Failed,'' ''Passed,'' ''Passed with distinction,'' and ''Passed with special

Treatment satisfaction will be evaluated after session 1 using a modified version of the Evaluation Questionnaire including 5 levels where higher levels indicate higher satisfaction.

The content of this session feels relevant The degree of difficulty in conveying the content of the session is at a reasonable level for me as a therapist Is there something else you would like to add?

Treatment satisfaction will be evaluated after session 2 using a modified version of the Evaluation Questionnaire including 5 levels where higher levels indicate higher satisfaction.

The content of this session feels relevant The degree of difficulty in conveying the content of the session is at a reasonable level for me as a therapist Is there something else you would like to add?

Treatment satisfaction will be evaluated after session 3 using a modified version of the Evaluation Questionnaire including 5 levels where higher levels indicate higher satisfaction.

The content of this session feels relevant The degree of difficulty in conveying the content of the session is at a reasonable level for me as a therapist Is there something else you would like to add?

Treatment satisfaction will be evaluated after the booster session using a modified version of the Evaluation Questionnaire including 5 levels where higher levels indicate higher satisfaction.

The content of this session feels relevant The degree of difficulty in conveying the content of the session is at a reasonable level for me as a therapist Is there something else you would like to add?

("How would you rate your well-being prior to the intervention?", "How would you rate your current well-being") at T1 and T2 on a scale 1-10 (1= very poor, 10= very good)

("How would you rate your well-being prior to the intervention?", "How would you rate your current well-being") at T1 and T2 on a scale 1-10 (1= very poor, 10= very good)

Adverse events will be defined as spontaneous oral complaints or instances when patients stated that they experienced negative or unwanted effects during the intervention period.

Serious adverse events will be defined as events that involved hospital care/hospitalization, etc. due to the intervention.

The healthcare worker assesses to what extent the goals have been met using the goal attainment scale. 5 point scale where high vales indicate that goals have been reached to a higher extent.

The healthcare worker assesses to what extent the goals have been met using the goal attainment scale. 5 point scale where high vales indicate that goals have been reached to a higher extent.

Participants are asked to assess self-efficacy for promoting health behaviors using the "Parental self-efficacy for healthy dietary and physical activity behaviors in preschool children (PDAP) including 24 items on a 0-10 point scale where high values indicate higher self-efficacy

Participants are asked to assess self-efficacy for promoting health behaviors using the "Parental self-efficacy for healthy dietary and physical activity behaviors in preschool children (PDAP) including 24 items on a 0-10 point scale where high values indicate higher self-efficacy

The Lev-s will be used to measure diet and physical activity before and after taking part in Lev. The scale includes 4 levels where higher levels indicate healthier habits.