Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Connective tissue diseases (CTD) are a group of diseases with diverse manifestations, most often multisystemic, which share an autoimmune etiology. They include Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), Systemic sclerosis (SSc), Sjögren's syndrome (SS), Inflammatory myopathies (IM) and Mixed connective tissue disease (MCTD).
Many patients in rheumatology present signs and symptoms of CTD, but without meeting all the classification criteria for one of these diseases. These patients will generally receive a diagnosis of undifferentiated connective tissue disease (UCTD). It is increasingly suggested that there are two subgroups of patients with UCTD: one which will eventually evolve into a better characterized CTD (approximately 30% of patients at 5 years) and another with a more benign prognosis. The optimal management of patients with UCTD is not clearly established.
Capillaroscopy is a diagnostic test used in the investigation of patients with CTD. It is a low-cost, non-invasive, rapid and specific test in the evaluation of this class of diseases. Its role is now well established in the diagnosis of SSc and in the investigation of Raynaud's phenomenon. In addition, capillaroscopy helps to identify patients suffering from CTD more quickly.
Knowledge about the role of capillaroscopy in UCTD is more limited. It is established that a significant proportion of patients with UCTD present abnormalities on UCTD present non-specific abnormalities and 11% present a scleroderma pattern. In these patients, abnormal capillaroscopy seems to increase the risk of progressing to a better characterized CTD, notably SSc.
However, although capillaroscopy is increasingly used in rheumatology in patients with CTD, more research is needed to clarify the role of this examination in UCTD. First, it is not established whether capillaroscopy should be performed in all patients with UCTD, nor when exactly it should be performed. There also remain questions about the impact of capillaroscopy on the prognosis and management of patients with this disease. To our knowledge, there is no prospective study that has addressed this question. The investigators hypothesize that in patients with UCTD, capillaroscopy compared to usual care makes it possible to increase the proportion of patients obtaining a diagnosis of better characterized CTD in the first six months of follow-up.
This is a pilot randomized controlled clinical trial. This monocentric project will be carried out within the rheumatology department of the Quebec university hospital.
The main objective of the project is to determine, in patients with undifferentiated connective tissue disease, to what extent capillaroscopy compared to usual care influences the proportion of patients obtaining a diagnosis of better characterized connective tissue disease in the first six months of follow-up.
The secondary objectives are:
Determine, in patients with undifferentiated connective tissue disease, to what extent capillaroscopy influences the following factors after capillaroscopy:
Evaluate the feasibility of recruiting participants in this study (the investigators will measure the number, proportions and rates of patients recruited and retained, as well as the number of individuals screened, eligible and recruited).
The investigators will recruit 40 patients with a diagnosis of undifferentiated connective tissue disease and referred for a capillaroscopy examination in rheumatology as part of clinical practice.
Once recruited, participants will be randomized into two groups, in a 1:1 ratio, stratifying for gender and duration since the onset of the first symptoms of the disease (less than three years and three years and more). The randomization blocks will be generated by the biostatistician.
In the intervention group, a capillaroscopy will be performed in the month following recruitment. In the control group, capillaroscopy will be performed six months (+/- two weeks) after recruitment.
The intervention studied as part of the project is capillaroscopy. This examination consists of visualizing the capillaries located at the base of the nail using a device called a capillaroscope. This device magnifies the image of the capillaries to clearly visualize them. Capillaries are the smallest blood vessels, which allow the passage of only one red blood cell at a time. At the nail bed, they form a network of loops and are aligned next to each other. This alignment allows them to be viewed over their entire length. Researchers have described abnormalities in capillaries that are associated with certain diseases involving microvascular damage.
Participants will be invited to attend an appointment at the outpatient clinic to perform the capillaroscopy. The date of this appointment will depend on the group into which they have been randomized. If they are assigned to the intervention group, capillaroscopy will be performed within one month after inclusion in the study. If they are assigned to the control group, capillaroscopy will be performed six months after inclusion in the study, (+/- two weeks). If the capillaroscopy appointment is missed, a new appointment will be scheduled within two weeks.
The results of capillaroscopy will be reported qualitatively, for all eight long fingers examined. This approach was chosen since it best represents current clinical practice. The capillaroscopy results will therefore be classified into one of the following categories: normal; nonspecific changes; scleroderma pattern; non-diagnostic quality.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capillaroscopy | Active Comparator | In the capillaroscopy group, the capillaroscopy will be performed in the month following recruitment. |
|
| Control | Other | In the control group, the capillaroscopy will be performed six months (+/- 2 weeks) after recruitment. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nail capillaroscopy | Diagnostic Test | The intervention studied as part of the project is capillaroscopy. This examination consists of visualizing the capillaries located at the base of the nail using a device called a capillaroscope. This device magnifies the image of the capillaries to clearly visualize them. Capillaries are the smallest blood vessels, which allow the passage of only one red blood cell at a time. At the nail bed, they form a network of loops and are aligned next to each other. This alignment allows them to be viewed over their entire length. Researchers have described abnormalities in capillaries that are associated with certain diseases involving microvascular damage. The results of capillaroscopy will be reported qualitatively, for all eight long fingers examined. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Proportion of participants who transitioned from a diagnosis of undifferentiated connective tissue disease to a diagnosis of better characterized connective tissue disease | The primary endpoint of the study will be the proportion of participants who transitioned from a diagnosis of undifferentiated connective tissue disease to a diagnosis of better characterized connective tissue disease at 6 months. | 6 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Proportion of participants who went from a diagnosis of undifferentiated connective tissue disease to a diagnosis of better characterized connective tissue disease | The proportion of participants who went from a diagnosis of undifferentiated connective tissue disease to a diagnosis of better characterized connective tissue disease at 12 months; | 12 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Questionnaire of acceptability of capillaroscopy | The investigators will determine the acceptability of capillaroscopy by a questionnaire consisting in 4 questions (duration of capillaroscopy, absence of pain and discomfort, acceptability of capillaroscopy to investigate the participant condition, recommendation of capillaroscopy to somebody else) to be answered by the use of 5-point Likert scale (from totally agree to totally disagree). |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laetitia Michou, MD PhD | Contact | 418-525-4444 | 48383 | laetitia.michou@crchudequebec.ulaval.ca |
| William Berthelot, MD | Contact | 418-654-2242 | william.berthelot.1@ulaval.ca |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Laetitia Michou, MD PhD | CHU de Quebec (Université Laval) | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHU de Quebec-Université Laval | Recruiting | Québec | Quebec | G1V4G2 | Canada |
Not provided
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| The established and evolving role of nailfold capillaroscopy in connective-tissue disease | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000074079 | Undifferentiated Connective Tissue Diseases |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003240 | Connective Tissue Diseases |
| D017437 | Skin and Connective Tissue Diseases |
| D001327 | Autoimmune Diseases |
| D007154 | Immune System Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Proportion of participants with a medication change from the baseline visit | The proportion of participants with a medication change from the baseline visit (defined as the addition, discontinuation, or dosage change of nonbiologic disease-modifying drugs, biologic disease-modifying drugs, Raynaud's medications, and corticosteroids) at 6 and 12 months | 6 and 12 months |
| Average number of rheumatology medical visits per participant | The average number of rheumatology medical visits per participant at 6 and 12 months (continuous value); | 6 and 12 months |
| Average number of medical visits in specialties other than rheumatology per participant | The average number of medical visits in specialties other than rheumatology per participant at 6 and 12 months (continuous value); | 6 and 12 months |
| Average number of hospitalizations per participant | The average number of hospitalizations per participant at 6 and 12 months (continuous value); | 6 and 12 months |
| Average number of emergency room visits per participant | The average number of emergency room visits per participant at 6 and 12 months (continuous value); | 6 and 12 months |
| Average number of additional examinations | The average number of additional examinations (blood samples, radiological examinations or others) which were prescribed by the treating rheumatologist per participant at 6 and 12 months (continuous value); | 6 and 12 months |
| Proportion of patients with a healthy weight | The proportion of patients with a healthy weight (body mass index of 18.5 to 24.9); | 6 and 12 months |
| Average number of alcohol drinks (standard drinks) consumed per week and per participant | The average number of alcohol drinks (standard drinks) consumed per week and per participant at 6 and 12 months (continuous value); | 6 and 12 months |
| Proportion of patients who are active smokers, former smokers and have never smoked | Smoking status (i.e. the proportion of patients who are active smokers, former smokers and have never smoked) at 6 and 12 months; | 6 and 12 months |
| Average number of cigarettes smoked per day per participant | The average number of cigarettes smoked per day per participant at 6 and 12 months (continuous value); | 6 and 12 months |
| Proportion of participants using tobacco products other than cigarettes | The proportion of participants using tobacco products other than cigarettes at 6 and 12 months; | 6 and 12 months |
| Proportion of participants using cannabis products | The proportion of participants using cannabis products at 6 and 12 months; | 6 and 12 months |
| Proportion of participants using drugs other than cannabis | The proportion of participants using drugs other than cannabis at 6 and 12 months; | 6 and 12 months |
| Average number of minutes of moderate to high intensity aerobic physical activity performed per week and per participant | The average number of minutes of moderate to high intensity aerobic physical activity performed per week and per participant at 6 and 12 months (continuous value); | 6 and 12 months |
| Proportion of participants who reported adopting a diet following the healthy eating recommendations of Canada's Food Guide | The proportion of participants who reported adopting a diet following the healthy eating recommendations of Canada's Food Guide at 6 and 12 months. | 6 and 12 months |
| Average score on the Health Assessment Questionnaire | The average score on the Health Assessment Questionnaire (from 0 to 3, with 3 decimal places); | 6 and 12 months |
| Average score for the eight components of the Short form survey 36 questionnaire | The average score for the eight components of the short form survey 36 questionnaire (from 0 to 100, with 2 decimal places): (1) physical functioning, (2) role limitations due to physical health problems, (3) bodily pain, (4) general health perceptions, (5) energy/fatigue, (6) social functioning, (7) role limitations due to personal or emotional problems and (8) emotional well-being; | 6 and 12 months |
| Average score on the eight components of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System29 scale | The average score on the eight components of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System29 scale (without decimal): (1) physical function (4 to 20), (2) anxiety (4 to 20), (3) depression (4 to 20), (4) fatigue (4 to 20), (5) sleep disturbances (4 to 20), (6) ability to participate in social roles and activities (4 to 20), (7) ) pain interference (4 to 20) and (8) pain intensity (0 to 10). | 6 and 12 months |
| 6 and 12 months |
| Questionnaire of satisfaction about study questionnaires | The investigators will evaluate the satisfaction of participants about study questionnaires by a questionnaire consisting in two questions (easiness to understand questionnaires, adequateness of time to complete questionnaires) to be answered by the use of 5-point Likert scale (from totally agree to totally disagree). | 6 and 12 months |
| Number of individuals screened, eligible and recruited. | The investigators will measure the number of individuals screened, eligible and finally recruited in the study. | 6 and 12 months |