Cystoscopic REDuction In BLadder Evaluations for Microhematuria - A Prospective Randomized, Controlled, Clinical Utility Study for Evaluation of Microhematuria (The CREDIBLE Study)
Cystoscopic REDuction In BLadder Evaluations for Microhematuria - A Prospective Randomized, Controlled, Clinical Utility Study for Evaluation of Microhematuria (The CREDIBLE Study)
This study includes adult patients who see a urologist because of blood in their urine. The amount is so small it can only be seen with a microscope. This is called microhematuria. There can be many reasons for microhematuria. One of them is bladder cancer. While bladder cancer is one of the biggest worries, it is only found in few of these patients.
Most microhematuria patients will have a cystoscopy to look inside the bladder. During a cystoscopy, a small camera is inserted into the bladder. This is done through the urethra, the tube that passes urine from the bladder to the outside. In some patients it can cause pain or anxiety. Not all patients have a cystoscopy. Those that don't, usually return for a urine sample within 6 months. This is done to check if there is still blood in their urine.
This study is conducted to find out if the use of "Cxbladder Triage Plus" changes the number of cystoscopies in microhematuria patients. Cxbladder Triage Plus is also called "Triage Plus". It is a lab test that was developed to check how likely urothelial carcinoma is present in the bladder. Urothelial carcinoma is by far the most common type of bladder cancer. For the test, the patient voids some urine into a cup. A laboratory then checks the urine of specific genetic material. Abnormalities can be a sign of urothelial carcinoma. The result indicates if the urine is more like most normal urine or more like that of urothelial carcinoma patients.
The study is done to find out how Triage Plus changes the number of cystoscopies. Study participants first void urine into a cup. The urine is used for the Triage Plus test. The patients are then assigned to one of two groups. The assignment is random. This means the nobody can influence the assignment. The chance to be assigned to either group is the same. In the test group, the urologist will receive the Triage Plus result and discuss it with the patient. Together they decide whether to do a cystoscopy. In the control group, the urologist will not receive the Triage Plus result. The patient will also not get the result. The urologist and patient will follow standard of care to decide whether to do a cystoscopy.
For test group patients, the study gives a recommendation whether to proceed with cystoscopy. It is based on the patient's Triage Plus result. The urologist and patient do not need to follow the recommendation. If the urologist does not follow it, they will complete a survey. The survey has only one question. It is asking for the reasons of the decision.
After making their decision, patients will follow the chosen pathway. Data on the performed procedures are collected. The diagnosis will also be documented. Data will be collected for up to about 9 months.
To see how Triage Plus changes the number of cystoscopies, these will be counted in each group and then compared.
Inclusion Criteria:
Patient is referred for assessment of recent hematuria, defined as either:
Physically able to provide a voided urine sample from a bladder that has not been surgically altered.
Able to give informed, written consent.
Able and willing to comply with study requirements.
Must be 19 or the legal age of consent in the jurisdiction in which the study is taking place to 88 years of age inclusive, at the time of signing the informed consent.
Ability to comprehend written and spoken English sufficiently to independently follow all study procedures. Or ability to comprehend Spanish with access to an English-Spanish interpreter for all study related verbal instructions and discussions.
Exclusion Criteria:
Donna.Smith@pacificedgedx.com+64212436696
tony.lough@pelnz.com+64 (0)21 0223 8591
Homewood, Alabama 35209, United States
msharpton@urologyal.com205-445-0129
raderholt@urologyal.com205-445-0124
Poughkeepsie, New York 12601, United States
pmanley@uampa.com251-234-5933
lcraig@uampa.com251-234-5933
"Kristin Santeufemia" <ksanteufemia@urologyassociates.net>559 321 2924
skhurram@folioclinicalresearch.com(424) 337-1411
kiamichel@gmail.com+1 310-278-8330
skhurram@folioclinicalresearch.com
samuel.lawindy@auihealth.com3862398500
sclemons@urologis-specialists.com2107698641
mramos@urologic-specialists.com2192591291
rdickstein@chesuro.com443-231-1313
adrew@summithealth.com856-900-6753
kmauro@summithealth.com856-673-1613
AMCurologyresearch@amc.edu518-262-8579
AMCurologyresearch@amc.edu518-262-8579
myang@imppllc.com9174093932
lgrey@premiermedicalhv.com845-437-3082
jrose@premiermedicalhv.com845-437-5082
severs@daytonphysicians.com(937) 771-2287
urologyresearch@pennstatehealth.psu.edu717-531-0003 ext. 283173
Kristen.r.scarpato@vumc.com615.343.2120
amason@folioclinicalresearch.com512-694-8888 ext. 15
Perla.Lopez@UTSouthwestern.edu2146459195
Maricruz.Ibarra@UTSouthwestern.edu2146458787
marrah@urology.wisc.edu608-262-3241
wiedmer@urology.wisc.edu608-265-9172