Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The aim of this study is to understand the effect of adapted functional training on the physical fitness, functionality and quality of life of individuals with SCI after social distancing due to COVID-19. The main question[s] it aims to answer are:
Participants will be evaluated through questionnaires and field tests, such as:
The spinal cord is an important component of the central nervous system, whose function is to transmit motor nerve impulses from the brain to other parts of the body, and to transmit sensory impulses from other systems of the body to the brain. Among adults living with SCI, studies show that participation in physical exercise programs, such as functional training, is associated with numerous health-related benefits, including improvements in cardiorespiratory fitness, energy production, and muscle strength, reduced the risk of cardiometabolic diseases and osteoporosis, in addition to psychosocial and quality of life benefits. However, high rates of physical inactivity among people with SCI are still a reality and, therefore, a cause for medical and health concern. In the recent scenario, measures to prevent and contain COVID-19 further contributed to the increase in sedentary time and behavior among individuals with spinal cord injury. Considering that TF aims to enhance specific actions in activities of daily living, the hypothesis of the cohort study is that a positive effect will be observed on functional capacity, on elements of physical fitness of these individuals and on quality of life after 8 weeks of training functional. Participants will be recruited by convenience and will undergo assessments of body composition, functional capacity, physical fitness and quality of life pre and post eight weeks of functional training, three times a week.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| FT group | Experimental | Functional Training group |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Functional Training | Other | Functional training was performed for eigth weeks. The group participated on the supervised training once a week and twice a week at home. The training was arranged in a circuit method, consisting of three to four blocks with two to three exercises each, with an execution time of two minutes and recovery of thirty seconds between exercises and one minute between each block. The exercises emphasized integrated, functional and multi-joint movements for mobility, flexibility, strength, power and muscular endurance with overload, as well as agility, speed and balance exercises. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Functional capacity with Battery of Motor Tests related to Functional Independence | The Motor Test Battery consisted of function and reach tests. After adding up the test scores, the individuals were classified as: "complete dependence" (0 to 6 points), "moderate autonomy" (7 to 13 points), "high autonomy" (14 to 20 points) and "total autonomy" (21 to 27 points). | Eigth weeks |
| Functional capacity with Motor Assessment Scale | The Motor Assessment Scale (Jorgensen et al., 2011) consists of six tests to assess static and proactive balance control, with the starting position being sitting on a bench, with hips and knees at 90º, without back support and feet on the floor. In each test, the testee can receive a score of 0 (does not perform the task and disqualifies the individual) or 1 (performs the task), with three possible attempts each. | Eigth weeks |
| Isometric handgrip strength | To assess physical fitness through musculoskeletal capacity, the Lafayette hand dynamometer hand grip test (kgf; Lafayette hand dynamometer; United States) was used in three attempts for both sides, where the highest number achieved was validated, with the measurements measured in KGF. | Eigth weeks |
| Upper limb power | A 3kg medicine ball throw test was carried out to assess the participant's muscle power. The participant had three attempts to throw the medicine ball as far as possible, with both hands at chest height. The distance, in meters (m), between the point where the ball touched the ground and the participant was measured and the lowest result of the three attempts was validated. | Eigth weeks |
| Agility | The Illinois Agility Test was carried out, which is used to measure multidirectional agility, both for disabled people in wheelchairs and for non-disabled people in clinical or athletic situations. To carry out the test, cones were used to mark out a pre-established route to be covered in the shortest time possible. The participant could make three attempts and the one with the shortest time, measured in seconds (s), was validated. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Arm muscle circumference | Arm muscle circumference was calculated using the equations proposed by Gurney and Jelliffe (1973): CMB (cm) = [Arm circumference (cm) - (π x triceps skinfold (mm))] | Eigth weeks |
| Perceived quality of life |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Total body mass | The measurement of total body mass was carried out with the participant in his wheelchair, using a scale of adequate dimensions, with an accuracy of 0.1 kg (ID-M300/5, Filizola, Brazil) and measurement unit in kilogram (kg). To determine the final TBM, the weight of the wheelchair was discounted. | Eigth weeks |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Larissa Barranco | Centro Universitário Augusto Motta | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Centro Universitário Augusto Motta | Rio de Janeiro | Brazil |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009043 | Motor Activity |
| D013119 | Spinal Cord Injuries |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001519 | Behavior |
| D013118 | Spinal Cord Diseases |
| D002493 | Central Nervous System Diseases |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Eigth weeks |
| Aerobic capacity | Cardiorespiratory capacity was measured using the 12-minute walk test on a pre-defined course that was 25 meters long, 15 meters wide and marked off 2 meters at the corners, giving a total perimeter of 75.32 meters. The participants were asked to cover as much distance as possible, measured in miles (mi), during the 12 minutes. | Eigth weeks |
Quality of life was investigated by applying the World Health Organization Quality of Life Questionnaire for People with Disabilities module ((WHOQOL-DIS), in the version translated and validated for Portuguese (Bredemeier et al., 2014). The options for each item are described on a five-level Likert scale, where participants rate satisfaction from 1 to 5 (5 "totally agree" and 1 "totally disagree"). The results were presented on a scale of 0 to 100 (WHOQOL,1998), scaled in a positive direction. In other words, the higher the score, the greater the interviewee's perception of QoL in each domain (WHOQOL,1998).
| Eigth weeks |
| Height |
Height was measured with the participant in a supine position on a stretcher (tape measure with a precision of 0.1 cm; CESCORF, Brazil) and measured in centimeters (cm). Height in dorsal decubitus was measured as the distance between the plane of the vertex and the calcaneus. |
| Eigth weeks |
| Body perimeters | The body perimeters of the relaxed and contracted arm and the abdomen were measured. A tape measure with a precision of 0.1 cm was used (Cescorf, Brazil). | Eigth weeks |
| Triceps skinfold | The triceps skinfold was measured with a 0.1 mm calibrated plicometer (Cescorf, Brazil) | Eigth weeks |
| Maximum oxygen consumption | Based on the distance achieved, maximum oxygen consumption (VO2max) was estimated using the formula proposed by Franklin et al. (1990): VO2max (ml/kg/min) = (Distance miles - 0.37) /0.0337. | Eigth weeks |
| D020196 |
| Trauma, Nervous System |
| D014947 | Wounds and Injuries |