Intravascular Imaging-guided Versus Angiography-guided PCI in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus: the Muticenter, Randomized, Prospective IVI-DIABETES Trial
Intravascular Imaging-guided Versus Angiography-guided PCI in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus: the Muticenter, Randomized, Prospective IVI-DIABETES Trial
Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) serves as a beneficial instrument during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) procedures, affording insight into lesion characteristics and stent implantation. The ULTIMATE trial recently evidenced that IVUS-guided Drug-Eluting Stent (DES) implantation notably ameliorated clinical outcomes in all-comers, especially in patients who underwent an optimal procedure defined by IVUS, as opposed to angiography guidance, resonating with findings from the IVUS-XPL study, OCTOBER trial, and RENOVATE COMPLEX PCI trial, further confirmed by more recent IVUS-ACS trial.
Optical coherence tomography (OCT) has a resolution 10 times higher than that of IVUS and can provide valuable information at each step of PCI.
Regrettably, a dearth of prospective, randomized, multicenter trials exists that scrutinize the benefits of IVI-guided as opposed to angiography-guided PCI in patients suffering from diabetes mellitus. However, several trials have presented subgroup analyses reporting the reduction of clinical events by IVUS but not OCT guidance in patients with diabetes mellitus, which served as the foundation for the design of this trial.
The current study hypothesizes that IVI-guided PCI will be superior with respect to target vessel failure (TVF), including cardiac death, target-vessel myocardial infarction (TVMI), or clinically-driven TVR when compared with angiography-guided PCI in patients with diabetes mellitus.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
chmengx@126.com13605157029
chmengx@hotmail.com+8618966700335
Nanjing, Jiangsu 210006, China
shuliz@126.com+86-25-52271003
linling@126.com+86-25-52271--9