Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of a 3D interactive model versus traditional teaching methods in enhancing the teaching of thoracic and lumbar spine fractures classification (AO Spine) among orthopedic residents.
The main questions this study aims to answer are:
Does the use of a 3D interactive model improve residents' knowledge regarding the AO Spine classification of spine fractures compared to traditional teaching methods? To what extent does the utilization of a 3D interactive model enhance understanding of spinal anatomy, injury mechanisms, pathophysiology, and fracture diagnosis among surgical residents?
Participants will be randomly assigned to either:
Group A: Access to the 3D interactive model depicting thoracic and lumbar spine fractures based on the AO Spine classification. They can explore fractures, access textual information, and anatomical annotations.
Group B: Traditional teaching materials including slides, texts, and diagrams illustrating spine fractures according to the AO Spine classification.
Researchers will compare the post-training knowledge and confidence levels in managing spine fractures between the two groups to assess the efficacy of the 3D model.
Participants will be required to fill out pre- and post-training questionnaires assessing their knowledge, experience with 3D educational tools, confidence levels in managing spine fractures, and satisfaction with the teaching method.
The study aims to ascertain if the use of the 3D model significantly enhances residents' comprehension of spine fractures compared to conventional teaching methods within the orthopedic curriculum.
Detailed Study Protocol
Primary Study - Validation of 3D Interactive Model for Teaching AO Spine Classification for Thoracic and Lumbar Spine Fractures
Introduction:
Thoracic and lumbar spinal fractures are common in orthopedic and trauma surgery. Despite various classifications available, such as the AO Spine classification, understanding these fractures, especially for novice residents, can be challenging. In response, a 3D interactive model has been developed to support the classification teaching. A preliminary validation study with expert surgeons has been conducted.
Objectives:
This study aims to validate the effectiveness of a 3D model in teaching thoracic and lumbar spine fractures compared to traditional teaching methods. The primary objective is to assess whether the use of the 3D model improves residents' knowledge regarding AO Spine classification, anatomy, injury mechanisms, pathophysiology, and diagnosis of spine fractures.
Methods:
This prospective randomized validation study will start in May 2024.
Two additional studies will be conducted as follows, with the same protocol :
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3D model group | Experimental | Residents having access to the 3D model |
|
| Traditional teaching group | Active Comparator | Residents having access to traditional educational support |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Education through a 3D model | Other | Training through a 3D model of the spine fractures |
| |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Specific Questionnaire | The primary outcome measure will be the final score on the post-test questionnaire assessing the student's knowledge. Each of the three studies will have specific questionnaire. | Immediately after the intervention |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS) | Assessment questionnaire of the students technical skills during the validation phase on sawbones. OSATS scale ranges from 7 to 35 points: the higher the score, the better the technical surgical skills. | Immediately after the intervention |
| Subjective questionnaire |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Léonard CHATELAIN, MD | Contact | +33646288048 | leonard.chatelain@gmail.com | |
| Antonia BLANIE, MD | Contact | antonia.blanie@aphp.fr |
Not provided
Not provided
IPD can be made available on reasonable request
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D013122 | Spinal Diseases |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001847 | Bone Diseases |
| D009140 | Musculoskeletal Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Education through a traditional pedagogical support |
| Other |
Training through a traditional pedagogical support |
|
Final score on a subjective questionnaire evaluating ease of use, immersion and satisfaction with the simulator. Each item ranges from 1 to 10, 10 being the best score (easiest use of the simulator, best immersion, best satisfaction). |
| Immediately after the intervention |