Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Thus, the present study aimed to evaluate the longevity of direct composite compared to indirect ceramic laminate veneers in multiple diastema closure cases using USPHS criteria. The formulated null hypothesis was that there is no significant difference in the clinical performance of direct composite and indirect ceramic laminate veneers in multiple diastema closure cases over two years.
Restorative materials and curing device In the current study, the manufacturer's instructions were followed for the use of the nanofilled composite resin (Estelite Asteria, Tokuyama Dental, Japan) for direct laminate veneers and IPS e.max Press (Ivoclar Vivadent, Amherst, NY, USA) for indirect laminate ceramic veneers. A light curing device with an output density of 655 mW/cm2 (LED Bluephase C5, Ivoclar, Vivadent, Amherst, NY, USA) was used. Demetron LED light meters were used to measure the light curing unit's intensity regularly (Demetron Research Corp., Danbury, CT, USA). Brand name, description, chemical composition, and manufacturers of the materials are presented in Table 1.
Study design, blinding & randomization The Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials statement was adhered to in the description of the experimental design. This study was a randomized controlled clinical trial that was double-blinded for both trial participants and outcome assessors. Randomization was performed using the flip of a coin for the choice of material. Using computerized sequence generating (www. randomizer.org), participants were divided into two groups with a 1:1 allocation ratio.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Estelite esteria composite | Experimental | Half of the patients received composite veneers using direct method |
|
| IPS Emax press ceramic | Experimental | Half of the patients received ceramic veneers using indirect technique |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct technique | Procedure | The composite was placed directly using free-hand technique |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage % of patients with marginal staining | The percentage of marginal staining in patients was clinically assessed using USPHS criteria. Restorations were given scores from 0 to 5 | 2 years after restoration procedure |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Abdallah Elshehri, Phd | Dept. of Conservative Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ali Elkaffas | Al Kharj | Saudi Arabia |
Plan can be shared with other researchers
Data will be available within 6 months for 5 years
For anyone
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003763 | Dental Leakage |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D014076 | Tooth Diseases |
| D009057 | Stomatognathic Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D019085 | Fluorescent Antibody Technique, Direct |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D005455 | Fluorescent Antibody Technique |
| D007150 | Immunohistochemistry |
| D006651 | Histocytochemistry |
| D003584 | Cytological Techniques |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Indirect technique | Procedure | The ceramic was placed using indirect method via laboratory casts |
|
| D019411 | Clinical Laboratory Techniques |
| D019937 | Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures |
| D003933 | Diagnosis |
| D006652 | Histological Techniques |
| D008919 | Investigative Techniques |
| D007158 | Immunologic Techniques |