Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Re-calculated sample size
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
2-DG-02 is a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind Phase 2 study to investigate the efficacy and safety of 2-Deoxy-D-Glucose as a pre-exposure prophylaxis using the rhinovirus challenge model in healthy study participants.
2-DG-02 is a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind Phase 2 study using the rhinovirus challenge model in healthy study participants aged 18 to 64 years.
The primary objective is to confirm the efficacy of 2-DG compared to placebo for the prevention of rhinovirus-associated illness.
Secondary objectives are
to evaluate the effect of 2-DG on the occurrence and course of rhinovirus infection
to evaluate the effect of 2-DG on the severity of symptoms of rhinovirus infection
to evaluate safety and tolerability of 2-DG administrated over 1 week in the presence of rhinovirus exposure
to evaluate pharmacokinetics of 2-DG
128 subjects, who have been pre-screened and found to be seronegative to rhinovirus type 39, are randomized 1:1 to either 2-DG (pre-exposure prophylaxis) or placebo the day prior to inoculation. Subjects receive 2-DG or placebo starting from the day prior to inoculation until 5 days post inoculation.
Interim safety and efficacy reviews are performed by a Safety Monitoring Committee.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Study Drug | Active Comparator | Each subject receives a multiple dose of a 3.5% 2-Deoxyglucose as nasal spray solution. The maximum daily dose is 56 mg/day if applied 4 times/day, over 7 days. |
|
| Placebo | Placebo Comparator | Each subject receives a multiple dose of placebo as nasal spray solution. The dose is corresponding to the amount of solution needed in the serum group. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2-Deoxy-D-glucose | Drug | Intranasal administration |
|
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| The difference in the rate of rhinovirus-associated illness between 2-DG and placebo | Difference in the rate of symptomatic illness and laboratory-confirmed infection | baseline until day 22 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Number of infected subjects | Difference in the number of subjects with laboratory-confirmed infections. A laboratory-confirmed infection is identified either by isolating rhinovirus on at least one day after the virus challenge using qPCR or by a 4-fold increase in neutralizing antibody titer to RV-39 from acute (day -1) to convalescent sera (day 22) using the neutralizing assay. | baseline, days 2-22 after start of dosing |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Ingrid de Visser-Kamerling, PhD | Centre for Human Drug Research | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Centre for Human Drug Research | Leiden | 2333 | Netherlands |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003139 | Common Cold |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D012141 | Respiratory Tract Infections |
| D007239 | Infections |
| D010850 | Picornaviridae Infections |
| D012327 | RNA Virus Infections |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003847 | Deoxyglucose |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003837 | Deoxy Sugars |
| D002241 | Carbohydrates |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Placebo | Other | Intranasal administration |
|
| Difference in percent of infected subjects | Difference in percentage of subjects with laboratory-confirmed infections. A laboratory-confirmed infection is identified either by isolating rhinovirus on at least one day after the virus challenge using qPCR or by a 4-fold increase in neutralizing antibody titer to RV-39 from acute (day -1) to convalescent sera (day 22) using the neutralizing assay. | baseline, days 2-22 after start of dosing |
| Difference in percent of days virus positive | Difference in the percentage of days with a positive virus load. A positive virus load is determined by isolating rhinovirus on at least one day following the virus challenge, either using qPCR or a TCID50 assay. | days 2-6 |
| Difference in peak nasal virus load | Virus load is confirmed by isolating rhinovirus on at least one day after the virus challenge, using either qPCR or a TCID50 assay. | days 2-6 |
| Difference in AUC nasal virus load | Difference in AUC log 10 nasal virus load. Virus load is confirmed by isolating rhinovirus on at least one day after the virus challenge, using either qPCR or a TCID50 assay. | days 2-6 |
| Difference in Total Jackson Symptom Score | The difference of total Jackson Symptom Score (4 point-liters scales from 0 to 3) where a lower score means a better outcome. | days 2-6 after start of dosing |
| Duration of illness | In study participants with RAI duration of illness is the time to the first day of the two consecutive days with a total symptom score ≤ 1 that occurs after the subject has met the symptom criteria for a RAI. A lower duration means a better outcome. | days 2-15 after start of dosing |
| Difference in percent of days Jackson Symptom Score positive | Percentage of days with positive Jackson Symptom Score ( score >2), where a lower percentage means a better outcome compared to placebo. | days 2-6 after start of dosing |
| Difference in Peak Jackson Symptom Score | The highest daily total of all patient-reported symptoms on the Jackson Cold Scale (4 point-liters scales from 0 to 3 where a lower score means a better outcome compared to placebo). | days 2-6 after start of dosing |
| Difference in peak total WURSS-21 | The highest daily total of all patient-reported symptoms on the WURSS-21 questionnaire (8-point Likert scales from 0 to 7) where a lower score means a better outcome compared to placebo. | days 2-6 after start of dosing |
| Difference in AUC total WURSS-21 | Difference in AUC total WURSS-21 based a score recorded through the WURSS-21 questionnaire (8-point Likert scales from 0 to 7) where lower score means a better outcome compared to placebo. | days 2-6 after start of dosing |
| Occurrence of adverse events (AEs) and adverse drug-reactions (ADRs) | Number of AEs and ADRs assessed by type, frequency and severity graded as per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). | from screening (day -56) until end of study (day 22± 2) after start of dosing |
| Biodistribution of multiple doses of 2-DG in plasma samples | Analysis of 2-DG concentrations in plasma samples measured by LCMS (μg/ml). | baseline, days 6 and 22± 2 after start of dosing |
| Biodistribution of multiple doses of 2-DG in nasal wash samples | Analysis of 2-DG concentrations in nasal wash samples measured by LCMS (μg/ml). | baseline, days 2-6 and day 22± 2 after start of dosing |
| D014777 |
| Virus Diseases |
| D012140 | Respiratory Tract Diseases |