Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
In patients with complex coronary artery disease (CAD), determining the optimal revascularization strategy (percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) remains a challenge. These high-risk patients pose an extreme surgical risk. However, with the development of new interventional techniques and materials, PCI is a good alternative to CABG and is referred to as complex high-risk indicated PCI (CHIP).
During CHIP, hemodynamics can deteriorate because of temporary complete coronary occlusion or profound myocardial ischemia. This could result in loss of cardiac output and hemodynamics collapse. Mechanical support during CHIP facilitates native cardiac function by achieving a stable hemodynamic state to withstand repetitive derangements such as ischemia caused by prolonged and repeated balloon inflations, and resume original cardiac function immediately postprocedure or shortly thereafter.
There are several mechanical circulatory support (MCS) systems available, i.e., intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation (IABP), Impella, TandemHeart, and veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO). These MCS have been widely studied in patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI) complicated by cardiogenic shock and showed conflicting results. However, studies regarding the use of MCS in the setting of CHIP are much less abundant and no randomized study has compared Impella with VA-ECMO in CHIP patients.
The aim of the study is to evaluate the effectiveness of interventional ventricular assist system (CorVad) compared to the venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) system in providing circulatory support for complicated and high-risk patient with indications for PCI.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Microaxial flow pump | Experimental | The microaxial flow pump (The CorVad percutaneous ventricular assist system) will offer intraoperative hemodynamic support during high-risk PCI procedures. |
|
| VA-ECMO | Active Comparator | The VA-ECMO offers intraoperative hemodynamic support during high-risk PCI procedures. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Microaxial flow pump | Device | The microaxial flow pump (The CorVad percutaneous ventricular assist system device) is a microaxial rotary blood pump that expels blood from the left ventricle into the ascending aorta, thus unloading the left ventricle. The CorVad system device can be introduced through a femoral percutaneous approach (14Fr) and can deliver an output of up to 4-6 L/min. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Major adverse event | Major adverse event is a composite endpoint, defined as all-cause death, stroke, myocardial infarction, revascularization, cardiovascular hospitalization, MCS-ARC defined bleeding types 3, 4, or 5, acute kidney injury, serious device-related adverse events, cardiopulmonary resuscitation | 1 month |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| All-cause death | 1, 3, 12, 24, 36, and 60 months | |
| Stroke | 1, 3, 12, 24, 36, and 60 months | |
| Myocardial infarction |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Device-related composite endpoint (DoCE) | Device-related composite endpoint (DoCE), defined as: cardiac death, target-vessel myocardial infarction (TV-MI), clinically and physiologically driven target lesion revascularization (CPI-TLR) | 1, 3, 12, 24, 36, and 60 months |
| Patient-related composite endpoint (PoCE) |
Inclusion Criteria:
18 Years to 90 Years
The Heart Team determined that the patients required coronary artery revascularization, but there is a high risk of CABG or the patients refuses CABG. After evaluation by the Heart Team, it was concluded that the patients can benefit from revascularization by undergoing high risk PCI
The subject is diagnosed with acute or chronic coronary syndrome, and
Patients who are able to give informed consent and complete the follow-up
Image inclusion criteria
Complex PCI maneuvers are defined as:
Exclusion Criteria
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Ling Tao, M.D., Ph.D. | Xijing Hospital | Study Chair |
| Chao Gao, M.D., Ph.D. | Xijing Hospital | Study Chair |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling Tao | Xi'an | Shannxi | 710032 | China |
Not provided
Prospective, 1:1 randomized, controlled, multicenter trial to assess effectiveness and safety of CorVad compared to VA-ECMO in complicated and high-risk patient with indications for PCI
Not provided
Not provided
A blinded and independent clinical event adjudication committee will adjudicate all primary and secondary outcomes
|
| VA-ECMO | Device | Veno-arterial extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (VA-ECMO) is a device originally created to replace heart and lung function. Venous deoxygenated blood is mechanically suctioned from a large central vein through a venous cannula by a centrifugal pump. It is then oxygenated, warmed, and restored into systemic circulation through an arterial cannula. |
|
| 1, 3, 12, 24, 36, and 60 months |
| Revascularization | 1, 3, 12, 24, 36, and 60 months |
| Cardiovascular hospitalization | Rehospitalization due to cardiovascular reasons | 1, 3, 12, 24, 36, and 60 months |
| MCS-ARC defined type 3, 4, 5 bleeding | Bleeding is defined by the "Updated definitions of adverse events for trials and registries of mechanical circulatory support: A consensus statement of the mechanical circulatory support academic research consortium" (MRC-ARC) | 1 month |
| Acute kidney injury | 1 month |
| Serious device-related adverse events | Including but not limited to cardiac structural impairment, severe limb ischemia (pale, pulseless, and necrotic), infection, aortic and aortic valve impairment, hemolysis, peri-procedural complications that cause death, permanent/severe disability to the subject, or significantly prolonged hospital stay or need for surgical intervention | 1 month |
| Cardiopulmonary resuscitation | 1 month |
| Hospitalization time | 1 month |
| Intensive care unit (ICU/CCU) stay time | 1 month |
| ECMO/Corvad utilization time | 1 month |
| Hemodynamic disorder | Hemodynamic disorder is defined as average arterial pressure (MAP) below 60 mmHg for more than 10 minutes with the requirement of additional vasoactive medications | 1 month |
| Transfusion rate | Transfusion rate is defined as patients who had transfusion / all enrolled patients. | 1 month |
| Units of transfusion | 1 month |
| Major adverse event | Major adverse event is a composite endpoint, defined as all-cause death, stroke, myocardial infarction, revascularization, cardiovascular hospitalization, MCS-ARC defined bleeding types 3, 4, or 5, acute kidney injury, serious device-related adverse events, cardiopulmonary resuscitation | 3, 12, 24, 36, and 60 months |
| Major Adverse Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Events | Major Adverse Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Events is a composite endpoint, defined as all-cause death, stroke, myocardial infarction, revascularization, cardiovascular hospitalization | 1, 3, 12, 24, 36, and 60 months |
Patient-related composite endpoint (PoCE), defined as: all-cause death, any stroke, any myocardial infarction, and any revascularization |
| 1, 3, 12, 24, 36, and 60 months |
| Net adverse clinical events | Net adverse clinical events, defined as: PoCE + MCS-ARC defined type 3, 4, 5 bleeding | 1, 3, 12, 24, 36, and 60 months |
| Cardiac death | 1, 3, 12, 24, 36, and 60 months |
| Ischemic stroke | 1, 3, 12, 24, 36, and 60 months |
| Hemorrhagic stroke | 1, 3, 12, 24, 36, and 60 months |
| Transient ischemic attack | 1, 3, 12, 24, 36, and 60 months |
| Target vessel myocardial infarction | 1, 3, 12, 24, 36, and 60 months |
| Target lesion revascularization | 1, 3, 12, 24, 36, and 60 months |
| Target vessel revascularization | 1, 3, 12, 24, 36, and 60 months |
| Clinically and physiologically driven target lesion revascularization (CPI-TLR) | 1, 3, 12, 24, 36, and 60 months |
| Rehospitalization | 1, 3, 12, 24, 36, and 60 months |
| MCS-ARC type 2 bleeding | 1 month |
| Puncture complications | Puncture complications: Vascular complications or percutaneous vascular suture failure | 1 month |
| Aortic valve injury | Aortic valve injury is defined as the occurrence of moderate and severe aortic valve regurgitation in patients with no pre-operative aortic valve regurgitation or mild regurgitation | 1 month |
| Active Infection | Active infection refers to an infection accompanied by clinical evidence, including pain, fever, or imaging findings consistent with infection, and requires the use of antimicrobial drugs for treatment. The definition of infection requires positive culture results from the site or organ of infection, unless there is strong clinical evidence indicating the presence of infection and the need for treatment. | 1 month |
| ECMO/Corvad setup time | Setup time is defined as the time from starting vessel puncture to the time providing cardiac support by the device | assessed at index PCI procedure |
| Complete revascularization rate | Complete revascularization is defined as the residual SYNTAX score ≤ 8 points | 1 month |
| Change in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) from baseline | 1, 12, 24, 36, and 60 months |
| Change in New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification from baseline | 1, 12, 24, 36, and 60 months |
| Change in Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) score from baseline | The SAQ is a 19-item self-administered disease-specific patient-reported outcome measure with 5 domains: physical limitation, angina stability, angina frequency, treatment satisfaction, and disease perception and/or quality of life. It was to identify a conceptual framework with which to elicit the important manifestations of coronary disease from the patient perspective. All SAQ domain scores and the summary score range from 0 to 100 points, with higher scores indicating less angina, fewer functional limitations, and better quality of life. | 1, 12, 36, and 60 months |
| Change in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) score from baseline | The KCCQ is a self-administered, 23-item questionnaire that quantifies physical limitations, symptoms, self-efficacy, social interference and quality of life. KCCQ scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating fewer symptoms and physical limitations. | 1, 12, 36, and 60 months |
| Change in 5-level EQ-5D version (EQ-5D-5L) standardized health status scale score from baseline | The EQ-5D is a standardized instrument for use as a measure of health outcome which can be divided into two parts: the EQ-5D health description system and the EQ-vas. EQ-5D-5L questionnaire is a five-item scale assessing five separate dimensions of health: (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression). Each dimension has to be answered on a five-level scale (no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems). The EQ-VAS is a 20 cm long vertical visual scale. A score of 100 at the top represents "best perceived health status" and a score of 0 at the bottom represents "worst perceived health status". | 1, 12, 36, and 60 months |
| Change in creatinine clearance rate from baseline | 1 month |
| Stent thrombosis | 1, 3, 12, 24, 36, and 60 months |