Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Osteosyntheses employed in treating fractures at the upper end of the femur play a critical role in facilitating a swift recovery by minimizing immobilization periods and enabling early rehabilitation of the affected joints, thereby promoting a speedy return to normal walking function.
Osteosynthesis alters the mechanical dynamics of the bone segment, which undergoes continual changes during the consolidation and mobilization phases of recovery. Throughout these stages, a range of mechanical complications may arise, posing challenges despite the successful prevention of infections. Non-infectious complications associated with the presence of osteosynthesis materials, especially in weight-bearing areas like the lower limb, remain a concern.
In light of these considerations, surgeons must exercise meticulous care in selecting synthetic materials to mitigate the risk of osteosynthesis failures. In cases where internal fixation fails, the standard recourse often involves converting to total hip arthroplasty (THA).
However, it is essential to note that THA subsequent to complications arising from proximal femur osteosynthesis presents a higher incidence of both intraoperative and postoperative complications compared to the implantation of primary total hip prostheses. Thus, while osteosynthesis remains a valuable intervention for femur fractures, careful attention to material selection and postoperative management is crucial in optimizing patient outcomes and minimizing complications.
The aim was to identify the causes of mechanical failures of osteosynthesis in order to prevent them. Methods: We present the experience of the Department of Surgical Orthopedic Surgery, concerning 35 cases summarized after failure of surgical treatment of a fracture of the proximal end of the femur for a period spreading between January 2015 and December 2021. . The literature already found evidence of the greater complexity of this type of procedure compared to a first-line total hip prosthesis. Accordingly, all this, Prevention is better than cure these stiffnesses through good preoperative planning. Other factors related to the terrain or to untimely loading of the implant are more difficult to control. Whatever the cause, the surgeon remains by the rigor in these indications, the choice of the synthetic material the essential element in the prevention of osteosynthesis failures.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| cases of recurrent fractures of the proximal end of the femur following surgical treatment failure |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| total hip arthroplasty | Procedure |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Surgical Approach | type of approach | from enrollment to the of treatment 6 years |
| Preparation of the Patient | type of preparation | from enrollment to the of treatment 6 years |
| Anesthesia | type of anesthesia | from enrollment to the of treatment 6 years |
| Type of Surgical Revision | material implanted for revision | from enrollment to the of treatment 6 years |
| Types of Prosthesis | prothesis used | from enrollment to the of treatment 6 years |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Age Distribution | The average age of patients experiencing therapeutic failure after surgical treatment of proximal femur fractures was 66 years, with ages ranging from 28 to 94 years. The age group 50-90 years constituted 68.59% of cases. | from enrollment to the end of treatment 6 years |
| Distribution by Sex |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
• Diagnosis of a fracture of the proximal end of the femur.
Exclusion Criteria:
• Those initially treated with total hip arthroplasty.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
cases of recurrent fractures of the proximal end of the femur following surgical treatment failure
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IBN jazzar hospital | Kairouan | 3190 | Tunisia |
use for other resaerchs
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000092526 | Proximal Femoral Fractures |
| D005265 | Femoral Neck Fractures |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D006620 | Hip Fractures |
| D005264 | Femoral Fractures |
| D050723 | Fractures, Bone |
| D014947 | Wounds and Injuries |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D019644 | Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip |
| D001860 | Bone Plates |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D019643 | Arthroplasty, Replacement |
| D001178 | Arthroplasty |
| D019637 | Orthopedic Procedures |
| D013514 | Surgical Procedures, Operative |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Females represented a slight majority in the study, accounting for 57% (20 women), while males comprised 43% (15 men). |
| from enrollment to the end of treatment 6 years |
| Distribution According to Affected Side | The right side was affected in 60% (21 cases), while the left side was affected in 40% (14 cases). | from enrollment to the end of treatment 6 years |
| Distribution According to Circumstances of Trauma | Fractures were predominantly due to minimal trauma, with rare occurrences related to road accidents or domestic falls, attributed to bone fragility and muscle atrophy. One case of a pathological fracture was observed in a patient with dislocation of an intermediate hip prosthesis due to ovarian cancer. | from enrollment to the end of treatment 6 years |
| D025981 |
| Hip Injuries |
| D007869 | Leg Injuries |
| D019651 | Plastic Surgery Procedures |
| D019919 | Prosthesis Implantation |
| D016268 | Internal Fixators |
| D019736 | Prostheses and Implants |
| D004864 | Equipment and Supplies |
| D009984 | Orthopedic Fixation Devices |
| D009983 | Orthopedic Equipment |
| D013523 | Surgical Equipment |
| D053831 | Surgical Fixation Devices |