Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This is a prospective, multicenter study aimed at evaluating the diagnostic accuracy and reliability of the Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Reporting and Data System (PSMA-RADS) version 1.0 in detecting prostate cancer using 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT imaging. The study also compared the performance of PSMA-RADS v1.0 with the updated version 2.0.
Key points:
Study Design and Patient Population:
Between January 2023 and August 2024, a total of 477 consecutive patients were recruited from four institutions. The study cohort included patients with newly diagnosed Pca referred for initial staging, patients with biochemical recurrence (BCR), and patients referred for follow-up. Patients were excluded based on the following criteria: inability to undergo PET/CT scan due to weight (e.g., >180 kg) (n= 4), claustrophobia or inability to lie still throughout the scanning duration (n= 6), allergy to contrast media (n= 3), hepatic impairment (n= 9), renal failure (n= 3), and patients lost during follow-up (n= 9). This resulted in a final cohort of 443 patients (164 new diagnoses, 108 BCR, and 171 follow-up). The flowchart of the study is illustrated in Fig. 1. Once enrolled; all patients underwent a 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT scan. For each patient, we determined the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) value, Gleason score (GS), and disease stage according to the TNM classification (molecular imaging TM (miTNM)), as proposed by PROMISE criteria.
Imaging Protocol:
Image Analysis:
Reference Standard:
The primary endpoint was diagnostic accuracy on a per-patient basis. For newly diagnosed patients (n= 167), the definitive diagnosis was validated by histopathological results after biopsy. Biopsies were obtained through a transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) guided procedure within two weeks before 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT imaging. For patients with biochemical recurrence, and patients with follow-up, the final diagnosis was confirmed based on the following: (i) Histopathological findings after biopsy (n= 151 patients (55 locoregional, 96 lymph nodes, 45 bone lesions, and 42 visceral soft tissue lesions)). Biopsies were taken by ultrasound-guided (n=78) or CT-guided (n=73) procedure within two weeks before 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT imaging. Two experienced pathologists evaluated all specimens, and the results were obtained by consensus. In patients with multiple lesions, the biopsy result of one lesion was considered representative of all lesions. Biopsies were performed to determine the lesion type as per the doctor's request. (ii) One year of clinical and imaging follow-up (n= 37). Follow-up imaging was completed every six months via 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT analysis. It was interpreted by a panel of expert readers who were informed of the locations of the lesions described by the blinded readers at initial imaging.
Statistical Analysis:
In summary, this prospective study rigorously evaluated the diagnostic performance and reliability of PSMA-RADS v1.0 on a multi-center cohort using 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT, and compared it head-to-head with the updated version 2.0, with thorough statistical analyses planned.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| 164 new diagnoses, 108 BCR, and 171 follow-up | 1. 164 new diagnoses. 2.108 BCR. 3. 171 follow-up |
Not provided
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Diagnostic Accuracy of PSMA-RADS v1.0 and v2.0 | The diagnostic accuracy of PSMA-RADS version 1.0 and version 2.0 for detecting prostate cancer lesions using 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT. Diagnostic accuracy will be evaluated using sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value, calculated on a per-patient basis. Histopathological results from biopsy and/or clinical/imaging follow-up will serve as the reference standard | One year |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Inter-rater Agreement of PSMA-RADS v1.0 and v2.0 | The degree of agreement among the three nuclear medicine radiologists in assigning PSMA-RADS categories using version 1.0 and version 2.0 criteria. Inter-rater agreement will be evaluated using Fleiss' kappa statistics | One year |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Male
Not provided
A total of 477 consecutive patients were initially recruited from three institutions between January 2023 and August 2024.
After applying the exclusion criteria, the final study cohort comprised 443 patients.
The cohort included three groups of patients:
164 new diagnoses, 108 BCR, and 171 follow-up
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Mohammad A. Basha, MD | Zagazig University | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mohammad Abd Alkhalik Basha | Zagazig | Select | 44631 | Egypt |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 40377421 | Derived | Almalki YE, Basha MAA, Ali SA, Donkol RH, Hamed MAG, Metwally MI, Hassan RMA, Frere RAF, Abdul Rahman AAE, Libda YI, Mahmoud NEM, Radwan MHSS, Eladl IM, Elsheikh AM, Zaitoun MMA, Mohamed Mohamed AS, AbdelHamid GA, Tantawy HF, Badr SE, Mosallam W, Al-Shatouri M, S Abo Shanab W, Dawoud TM, Khater HM, Abouelkheir RT, Abdelhamed H, Obaya AA, Elshafaay BS, Basha AMA, Mohammad RMA, Ebaid NY. Comparison of Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Reporting and Data System Version 1.0 versus 2.0 for Prostate Cancer Assessment. Radiol Imaging Cancer. 2025 May;7(3):e240390. doi: 10.1148/rycan.240390. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | Jan 21, 2024 | Apr 5, 2024 | Prot_SAP_000.pdf |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D011471 | Prostatic Neoplasms |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D005834 | Genital Neoplasms, Male |
| D014565 | Urogenital Neoplasms |
| D009371 | Neoplasms by Site |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| D005832 |
| Genital Diseases, Male |
| D000091662 | Genital Diseases |
| D000091642 | Urogenital Diseases |
| D011469 | Prostatic Diseases |
| D052801 | Male Urogenital Diseases |