Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn about the use of turmeric (Curcumin) as a treatment for pain of thumb-joint arthritis. Turmeric is commonly being used as an over-the-counter treatment for musculoskeletal pain. Clinical trials have demonstrated a pain-relief benefit for knee osteoarthritis, however no clinical trial has been performed to establish efficacy of curcumin in humans for thumb-joint arthritis. The main question[s] it aims to answer are:
Participants will:
This randomized controlled trial of oral curcumin for the treatment of pain of CMC arthritis will investigate the therapeutic potential of curcumin as an oral treatment for pain of CMC arthritis. Rationale: Curcumin is commonly being used as an over-the-counter treatment for musculoskeletal pain. Clinical trials have demonstrated a pain-relief benefit for knee osteoarthritis, however no clinical trial has been performed to establish efficacy of curcumin in humans for CMC arthritis. Hypothesis: Curcumin is more effective than placebo for relieving pain and improving patient-reported outcomes for CMC arthritis Study Design: The study design will be a double-blind, randomized controlled trial with crossover. Treatment will be blinded to the subjects and investigators. Patients will be randomly assigned 4 weeks of the Curcumin or control and then crossover to the other condition for 4 additional weeks. Patients will take the oral curcumin or control placebo capsule twice daily. Subjects will be advised to observe adverse effects.
The study design will be a double-blind randomized control trial with crossover. Treatment will be blinded to the subjects and investigators. Patients will be randomly assigned 4 weeks of the case (curcumin) or control capsules and then crossover to the other condition for 4 more weeks with a 2-week washout interval between. Patients will take one oral capsule by mouth twice daily. The subjects will be advised to observe for physiologic changes, skin changes, or other adverse effects. If mild to severe adverse events are noticed, the patient's will discontinue the use of the capsules, and appropriate care and observation will be taken. Each condition will last for 4 weeks and then subjects will be contacted by the study coordinator to facilitate crossover into the other condition following a 2-week washout period. To capture any delayed-onset adverse events, subjects will attend a follow-up visit seven days following the last dose of the curcumin capsule.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oral curcumin | Experimental | Oral curcumin 500 mg capsules taken twice each day for 4 weeks. |
|
| Placebo | Placebo Comparator | Oral placebo capsules taken twice each day for 4 weeks. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Curcumin | Drug | 500 mg capsule twice daily |
|
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change from Baseline in Pain on the Visual Analog Pain (VAS) Score | The Visual Analog Pain (VAS) Score is a validated, self-reported subjective measure for measuring acute and chronic pain. Possible scores range from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). Change = (Week (4 or 6) Score - Baseline Score).a validated, self-report | Baseline and Week 4, Week 6 |
| Change from Baseline in Pain on the Visual Analog Pain (VAS) Score - crossover condition | The Visual Analog Pain (VAS) Score is a validated, self-reported subjective measure for measuring acute and chronic pain. Possible scores range from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). Change = (Week Change = (Week (10 or 12) Score - Baseline Score). | Baseline and Week 10, Week 12 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change from Baseline in Normal Function on the Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation (SANE) Score | The SANE Score is a self-reported subjective measure for measuring percentage of normal function. Possible scores range from 0 (most abnormal) to 100 (normal). Change = (Week (4 or 6) Score - Baseline Score) | Baseline and Week 4, Week 6 |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Provision of signed and dated informed consent form.
Stated willingness to comply with all study procedures and availability for the duration of the study.
Male or female, aged 18 years or older.
For females, must be willing to use an approved form of birth control during this study. Acceptable forms of birth control:
The following may be used if combined with other birth control methods:
For males, must be willing to not father a baby for the duration of the study and for 90 days after the last dose of study drug, or donate to a sperm back during this time. Must be willing to use an approved form of birth control during this time. Acceptable forms of birth control:
Daily visual analog pain greater than 5 and ≤ 9 out of 10.
Duration of pain for greater than 30 days.
Presence of radiographically confirmed diagnosis of thumb basal joint arthritis
Exclusion Criteria:
Participant does not speak English.
Participant is blind.
Severe cardiac, pulmonary, liver, gastrointestinal and hematological disease (including coagulopathy), and /or renal disease.
Abnormal hematological, coagulation, and/or liver function test results.
Coumadin use at time of screening.
Use of any anticoagulant and antiplatelet medication.
History of mental illness.
Participant who is incarcerated.
History of drug or substance abuse.
Pre-existing curcumin or turmeric product usage within 3 months of the study period.
Participant has had a corticosteroid injection ≤ 60 days prior.
Participant has had prior surgery for osteoarthritis treatment
Participant who has fibromyalgia and post-operative pain.
Females who are pregnant, nursing or planning a pregnancy
Participants within 14 days of the study procedure taking prescription or non-prescription medication which are substrates of CYP3A4:
Participants within 14 days of the study procedure taking prescription or non-prescription medication which are substrates of CYP2C19:
Participants within 14 days of the study procedure taking prescription or non-prescription medication which are substrates of CYP2C8:
Participants within 14 days of the study procedure taking prescription or non-prescription medication which are substrates of CYP2C9:
Participants within 14 days of the study procedure taking prescription or non-prescription medication which are substrates of CYP1A2:
Participants within 14 days of the study procedure taking prescription or non-prescription medication which are substrates of CYP2B6 :
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Brent DeGeorge, MD, PhD | University of Virginia Department of Plastic Surgery | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University of Virginia | Charlottesville | Virginia | 22903 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 29428245 | Background | Wolf JM, Atroshi I, Zhou C, Karlsson J, Englund M. Sick Leave After Surgery for Thumb Carpometacarpal Osteoarthritis: A Population-Based Study. J Hand Surg Am. 2018 May;43(5):439-447. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2017.11.019. Epub 2018 Feb 7. | |
| 29343479 | Background | Brat GA, Agniel D, Beam A, Yorkgitis B, Bicket M, Homer M, Fox KP, Knecht DB, McMahill-Walraven CN, Palmer N, Kohane I. Postsurgical prescriptions for opioid naive patients and association with overdose and misuse: retrospective cohort study. BMJ. 2018 Jan 17;360:j5790. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j5790. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ICF | No | No | Yes | Informed Consent Form | Dec 10, 2024 | Dec 9, 2025 | ICF_000.pdf |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003474 | Curcumin |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D036381 | Diarylheptanoids |
| D006536 | Heptanes |
| D000473 | Alkanes |
| D006839 | Hydrocarbons, Acyclic |
Not provided
Not provided
The study design will be a double-blind, randomized controlled trial with crossover.
Not provided
Not provided
Double-blind Randomized Controlled Trial
| Placebo | Drug | capsule twice daily |
|
| Change from Baseline in Normal Function on the Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation (SANE) Score - crossover condition |
The SANE Score is a self-reported subjective measure for measuring percentage of normal function. Possible scores range from 0 (most abnormal) to 100 (normal). Change = (Week 10, Week 12 Score - Baseline Score) |
| Baseline and Week 10, Week 12 |
| Change from Baseline in Quality of Life on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Global Health-10 Score | The PROMIS Global Health-10 is a validated, self-reported subjective measure for measuring generic health related quality of life. Possible scores range from 0 (most severe impairment) to 20 (best health). Change = (Week (4 or 6) Score - Baseline Score) | Baseline and Week 4, Week 6 |
| Change from Baseline in Quality of Life on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Global Health-10 Score - crossover condition | The PROMIS Global Health-10 is a validated, self-reported subjective measure for measuring generic health related quality of life. Possible scores range from 0 (most severe impairment) to 20 (best health). Change = (Week (10 or 12) Score - Baseline Score) | Baseline and Week 10, Week 12 |
| Change from Baseline in Pain interference on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Interference Score | The PROMIS Pain Interference is a validated, self-reported subjective measure for measuring generic health related quality of life. Possible scores range from 0 (does not interfere) to 10 (completely interferes). Change = (Week (4, 6) Score - Baseline Score) | Baseline and Week 4, Week 6 |
| Change from Baseline in Pain interference on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Interference Score - crossover condition | The PROMIS Pain Interference is a validated, self-reported subjective measure for measuring generic health related quality of life. Possible scores range from 0 (does not interfere) to 10 (completely interferes). Change = (Week (10, 12) Score - Baseline Score) | Baseline and Week 10, Week 12 |
| Change from Baseline in Pain interference on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Upper Extremity (UE) Score | The PROMIS UE computer adaptive test is a validated computer adaptive test to assess upper extremity functional status. Change = (Week (4, 6) Score - Baseline Score) | Baseline and Week 4, Week 6 |
| Change from Baseline in Pain interference on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Upper Extremity (UE) Score | The PROMIS UE computer adaptive test is a validated computer adaptive test to assess upper extremity functional status. Change = (Week (10, 12) Score - Baseline Score) | Baseline and Week 10, Week 12 |
| Change from Baseline in Pain on the Australian/Canadian Hand Osteoarthritis (AUSCAN) Index | The AUSCAN Index is a 15-item scale measuring pain (5 items), stiffness (1 item) and function (9 items) during the preceding 48 hours. Possible scores range from 0 (none) to 4 (extreme). Change = (Week (4, 6) Score - Baseline Score) | Baseline and Week 4, Week 6 |
| Change from Baseline in Pain on the Australian/Canadian Hand Osteoarthritis (AUSCAN) Index | The AUSCAN Index is a 15-item scale measuring pain (5 items), stiffness (1 item) and function (9 items) during the preceding 48 hours. Possible scores range from 0 (none) to 4 (extreme). Change = (Week (10, 12) Score - Baseline Score) | Baseline and Week 10, Week 12 |
| Change from Baseline in Disability on The Quick Disability of the Arm, Shoulder (QuickDASH). | The QuickDASH is a validated, self-reported 11-item scale measuring disability. Possible scores range from 0 (no disability) to 100 (most severe disability. Change = (Week 4 Score - Baseline Score) | Baseline and Week 4 |
| Change from Baseline in Disability on The Quick Disability of the Arm, Shoulder (QuickDASH) - crossover condition | The QuickDASH is a validated, self-reported 11-item scale measuring disability. Possible scores range from 0 (no disability) to 100 (most severe disability. Change = (Week 10 Score - Baseline Score) | Baseline and Week 10 |
| Change from Baseline in perseverance on the Brief Resilience Index (BRI) | The BRI is a validated, self-reported 6-item validated tool to assess for resilience. Possible scores range from 1 (low resilience) to 5 (high resilience). Change = (Week (4, 6) Score - Baseline Score) | Baseline and Week 4, Week 6 |
| Change from Baseline in perseverance on the Brief Resilience Index (BRI) - crossover condition | The BRI is a validated, self-reported 6-item validated tool to assess for resilience. Possible scores range from 1 (low resilience) to 5 (high resilience). Change = (Week (10, 12) Score - Baseline Score) | Baseline and Week 10, Week 12 |
| Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Adverse Events | Treatment-related adverse events will be reported throughout the study by self-report and clinician-driven questions at each visit | Through study completion, an average of 12 weeks |
| Change from Baseline in the Mean Seated Trough Cuff Systolic Blood Pressure | Blood pressure (SBP and DBP) in mmHg using Sphygmomanometer will be assessed by the researchers at baseline and follow-up | Baseline and Week 4 |
| Change from Baseline in heart rate | Heartbeats per minute (BPM) will be assessed by the researchers at baseline and follow-up | Baseline and Week 4 |
| Change from Baseline in the Mean Seated Trough Cuff Systolic Blood Pressure | Blood pressure (SBP and DBP) in mmHg using Sphygmomanometer will be assessed by the researchers at baseline and follow-up | Week 4 and Week 6 |
| Change from Baseline in heart rate | Heartbeats per minute (BPM) will be assessed by the researchers at baseline and follow-up | Week 4 and Week 6 |
| Change from baseline in serum liver panel parameters: Alanine transaminase (ALT), Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) | Change from baseline in serum liver panel parameters: ALT, ALP and AST (International units per liter) at baseline and follow up | Through study completion, an average of 12 weeks |
| Change from baseline in serum comprehensive metabolic panel (CMP) parameters: glucose, blood urea nitrogen (BUN), Creatinine, Calcium | Change from baseline in serum comprehensive metabolic panel (CMP) parameters: glucose, BUN, Creatinine, Calcium (mg/dL) at baseline and follow up | Through study completion, an average of 12 weeks |
| Change from baseline in serum comprehensive metabolic panel (CMP) parameters: estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) | Change from baseline in serum comprehensive metabolic panel (CMP) parameters: eGFR (mL/min/1.73m2) at baseline and follow up | Through study completion, an average of 12 weeks |
| Change from baseline in serum comprehensive metabolic panel (CMP) parameters: Bilirubin | Change from baseline in serum comprehensive metabolic panel (CMP) parameters: Bilirubin (umol/L) at baseline and follow up | Through study completion, an average of 12 weeks |
| Change from baseline in serum comprehensive metabolic panel (CMP) parameters: Sodium, Potassium, Chloride, Carbon Dioxide | Change from baseline in serum comprehensive metabolic panel (CMP) parameters: Sodium, Potassium, Chloride, Carbon Dioxide (meq/L) at baseline and follow up | Through study completion, an average of 12 weeks |
| Change from baseline in serum comprehensive metabolic panel (CMP) parameters: Protein, Albumin | Change from baseline in serum comprehensive metabolic panel (CMP) parameters: Protein, Albumin (g/dL) at baseline and follow up | Through study completion, an average of 12 weeks |
| Change from baseline in serum comprehensive metabolic panel (CMP) parameters: Prothrombin time- International normalized ratio (PT-INR) | Change from baseline in serum comprehensive metabolic panel (CMP) parameters: Prothrombin time- International normalized ratio (PT (seconds)-INR) at baseline and follow up | Through study completion, an average of 12 weeks |
| Change from baseline in serum complete blood count (CBC) parameters: Red Blood Cells (CBC), White Blood Cells (WBC), Platelets | Change from baseline in serum complete blood count (CBC) parameters: RBC, WBC, Platelets (uL) at baseline and follow up | Through study completion, an average of 12 weeks |
| Change from baseline in serum complete blood count (CBC) parameters: Hemoglobin | Change from baseline in serum complete blood count (CBC) parameters: Hemoglobin (g.dL) at baseline and follow up | Through study completion, an average of 12 weeks |
| Change from baseline in serum complete blood count (CBC) parameters: Hematocrit | Change from baseline in serum complete blood count (CBC) parameters: Hematocrit (percentage) at baseline and follow up | Through study completion, an average of 12 weeks |
| Change from baseline in serum complete blood count (CBC) parameters: Mean Corpuscular Volume (MCV) | Change from baseline in serum complete blood count (CBC) parameters: Mean Corpuscular Volume (MCV) (pg) at baseline and follow up | Through study completion, an average of 12 weeks |
| Change from baseline in serum complete blood count (CBC) parameters: the amount of hemoglobin per red blood cell.(MCH) | Change from baseline in serum complete blood count (CBC) parameters: the amount of hemoglobin per red blood cell.(MCH) (pg) at baseline and follow up | Through study completion, an average of 12 weeks |
| 17075840 | Background | Funk JL, Frye JB, Oyarzo JN, Kuscuoglu N, Wilson J, McCaffrey G, Stafford G, Chen G, Lantz RC, Jolad SD, Solyom AM, Kiela PR, Timmermann BN. Efficacy and mechanism of action of turmeric supplements in the treatment of experimental arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2006 Nov;54(11):3452-64. doi: 10.1002/art.22180. |
| 25972154 | Background | Lakhan SE, Ford CT, Tepper D. Zingiberaceae extracts for pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Nutr J. 2015 May 14;14:50. doi: 10.1186/s12937-015-0038-8. |
| 17900536 | Background | Goel A, Kunnumakkara AB, Aggarwal BB. Curcumin as "Curecumin": from kitchen to clinic. Biochem Pharmacol. 2008 Feb 15;75(4):787-809. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2007.08.016. Epub 2007 Aug 19. |
| 27533649 | Background | Daily JW, Yang M, Park S. Efficacy of Turmeric Extracts and Curcumin for Alleviating the Symptoms of Joint Arthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials. J Med Food. 2016 Aug;19(8):717-29. doi: 10.1089/jmf.2016.3705. |
| 36044293 | Background | Travica N, Teasdale S, Marx W. Nutraceuticals in mood disorders: current knowledge and future directions. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2023 Jan 1;36(1):54-59. doi: 10.1097/YCO.0000000000000826. Epub 2022 Aug 29. |
| 36014474 | Background | Hafez Ghoran S, Calcaterra A, Abbasi M, Taktaz F, Nieselt K, Babaei E. Curcumin-Based Nanoformulations: A Promising Adjuvant towards Cancer Treatment. Molecules. 2022 Aug 16;27(16):5236. doi: 10.3390/molecules27165236. |
| 35935936 | Background | Zeng L, Yang T, Yang K, Yu G, Li J, Xiang W, Chen H. Efficacy and Safety of Curcumin and Curcuma longa Extract in the Treatment of Arthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trial. Front Immunol. 2022 Jul 22;13:891822. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.891822. eCollection 2022. |
| 29622343 | Background | Bannuru RR, Osani MC, Al-Eid F, Wang C. Efficacy of curcumin and Boswellia for knee osteoarthritis: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2018 Dec;48(3):416-429. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2018.03.001. Epub 2018 Mar 10. |
| 34537344 | Background | Hsiao AF, Lien YC, Tzeng IS, Liu CT, Chou SH, Horng YS. The efficacy of high- and low-dose curcumin in knee osteoarthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Complement Ther Med. 2021 Dec;63:102775. doi: 10.1016/j.ctim.2021.102775. Epub 2021 Sep 16. |
| 33511486 | Background | Wang Z, Singh A, Jones G, Winzenberg T, Ding C, Chopra A, Das S, Danda D, Laslett L, Antony B. Efficacy and Safety of Turmeric Extracts for the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials. Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2021 Jan 28;23(2):11. doi: 10.1007/s11926-020-00975-8. |
| 24672232 | Background | Kuptniratsaikul V, Dajpratham P, Taechaarpornkul W, Buntragulpoontawee M, Lukkanapichonchut P, Chootip C, Saengsuwan J, Tantayakom K, Laongpech S. Efficacy and safety of Curcuma domestica extracts compared with ibuprofen in patients with knee osteoarthritis: a multicenter study. Clin Interv Aging. 2014 Mar 20;9:451-8. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S58535. eCollection 2014. |
| D006838 |
| Hydrocarbons |
| D009930 | Organic Chemicals |
| D002396 | Catechols |
| D010636 | Phenols |
| D001555 | Benzene Derivatives |
| D006841 | Hydrocarbons, Aromatic |
| D006844 | Hydrocarbons, Cyclic |