Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| American College of Radiation Oncology | UNKNOWN |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Standard planning constraints for liver SBRT incorporate strict dose-volume limits for normal liver parenchyma to minimize the risk of radiation-induced liver disease. The presence of diurnal and fasting/fed variations in liver volume therefore carry substantial potential for introducing errors into estimates of dose-volume distribution within normal liver tissue, as well as affecting day-to-day setup fidelity and organ alignment for treatment. This prospective study will examine how diurnal and fast-fed variations in liver volume affect treatment planning for abdominal SBRT.
Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is an integral tool in the management of thoracic and upper abdominal malignancies. SBRT delivers ablative radiation doses in a limited number of fractions (thereby reducing interruptions in systemic therapy) with emerging evidence for feasibility and local control benefit. Effective SBRT delivery requires high-precision target localization that accounts for positional variations in both the target and nearby organs at risk (OAR). An absolute requirement for SBRT is accurate target localization and motion management, particularly when treating targets in the chest and abdomen, which are subject to respiratory motion as well as changes in configuration due to deformation of hollow viscera. To ensure adequate targeting, various technical solutions are available, including motion management approaches such as four-dimensional computed tomography (4D-CT), abdominal compression, respiratory gating, and breath hold, as well as daily image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) techniques such as cone beam computed tomography (CBCT), which facilitate precise daily target verification and minimization of the planning target volumes (PTVs). While the effects of respiratory motion on patient positioning during upper abdominal SBRT are relatively well understood, little is known about the effect of liver volume changes on radiotherapy (RT) dose delivery, despite the potential for morphological variations in the liver to affect patient setup and radiation dose distribution in real time. The liver is a dynamic organ with various functions including glycogen storage, carbohydrate (carb)/lipid/protein metabolism, bile secretion, synthesis of plasma proteins, and metabolism of various substances including steroid hormones and ingested toxins. Liver function is affected by fasting and feeding cycles, with an intrinsic circadian rhythm first observed in animal studies. This trial proposes to affect liver volume to ultimately and positively affect treatment planning for abdominal SBRT.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| High Carbohydrate Diet | Experimental |
|
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standardized high-carbohydrate meal | Dietary Supplement | 8 ounces of Ensure® nutritional protein shake or a similar meal |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Diurnal Difference in Liver Volumes | Percentage diurnal difference in total liver volumes (change in liver volume), as measured by Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) planning software. | At baseline and at 4 hours post intervention |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Difference in total liver volume | Percentage difference in total liver volume (measured by Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) planning software) after standardized high-carb meal (intervention). | At baseline and at 1 hour post intervention |
| Percentage diurnal difference in liver mean dose at V5 Gy |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
• Have primary upper abdominal (pancreatic, bile duct, liver) cancer or upper abdominal metastases (liver, adrenal, upper abdominal lymph nodes) planned to undergo SBRT.
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Samantha Demko, BSN | Contact | 412-623-1400 | albesl@upmc.edu | |
| Brieanna Marino, MS | Contact | 412-647-8258 | rowlesbm@upmc.edu |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Susannah Ellsworth, MD | UPMC Hillman Cancer Center | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UPMC Hillman Cancer Center | Recruiting | Pittsburgh | Pennsylvania | 15232 | United States |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Percentage diurnal difference in liver mean dose at V5 Gy (measured by Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) planning software) after standardized high-carb meal (intervention). |
| At baseline and at 1 hour post intervention |
| Percentage diurnal difference in liver mean dose at V15Gy | Percentage diurnal difference in liver mean dose at V15 Gy (measured by Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) planning software) after standardized high-carb meal (intervention). | At baseline and at 1 hour post intervention |
| Difference in liver mean dose at V15 Gy | Percentage difference in liver mean dose, V5 Gy (measured by Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) planning software) after standardized high-carb meal (intervention). | At baseline and at 1 hour post intervention |
| Difference in liver dose at V15 Gy | Percentage difference in liver mean dose at V15 Gy (measured by Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) planning software) after standardized high-carb meal (intervention). | At baseline and at 1 hour post intervention |