Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This prospective, double-blinded randomized controlled trial aims to compare the efficacy of the serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) ultrasound guided versus anatomical landmark guided for gynecomastia surgery. And to detect if the anatomical landmark technique is inferior or not to the ultrasound guided technique. We hypothesize that anatomical landmark guided SAPB is not inferior to ultrasound guided SAPB.
Gynecomastia means enlarged male breast. Minimally invasive liposuction and surgical intervention are possible remedies for such cases. Postoperative pain can be controlled by opioids or regional blocks like serratus anterior plane block. Ultrasound guided blocks are associated with high success rate; however, anatomical landmark guided blocks may give similar results. Our hypothesis was that landmark guided serratus anterior plane block would be non-inferior to ultrasound plane block. Subjects presenting for gynecomastia surgery will receive ultrasound guided block in one side (US group) and landmark guided block in the other side (LM group) with the same volume (25) ml and concentration (0.25 %) of bupivacaine. The primary outcome will be visual analogue score. Secondary outcomes include patient satisfaction and incidence of complications like pneumothorax. It will be carried out over 40 male patients, aged from (18 - 60) year-old, with ASA I or II classes who will undergo elective gynecomastia surgery. Patient with BMI ≥ 35, history of previous chest surgery, drug abuse, allergy to local anesthetics, psychiatric problems or patient refusal will be excluded from participation
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| ultrasound vs anatomical landmark SAPB | Forty subjects presenting for gynecomastia surgery will receive ultrasound guided block in one side (US group) and landmark guided block in the other side (LM group) with the same volume (25) ml and concentration (0.25 %) of bupivacaine. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Serratus anterior plane block | Other | ultrasound guided SAPB vs anatomical landmark guided SAPB |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| visual analouge score (VAS) | 11 point scale, 0 means no pain, 10 means worst pain. | the first hour, postoperative |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| first call of analgesia | the time for the first call of analgesia | in the first 24 hours |
| incidence of complications | pneumothorax, skin bruises |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
male patients with gynecomastia
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Wesamelsin A Soltan, MD | Menoufia University | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Menoufia University Hospitals | Shibīn al Kawm | Menoufia | Egypt |
study protocol can be shared with other researchers after finishing the research.
2-3 months and will be available forever
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D006177 | Gynecomastia |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001941 | Breast Diseases |
| D012871 | Skin Diseases |
| D017437 | Skin and Connective Tissue Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| in the first 24 hours |
| patient satisfaction | 1-5 score, 1 means very dissatisfied, 5 means very satisfied | in the first 24 hours |