Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Sixteen dental implants inserted in sixteen patients who were selected from the outpatient clinic of the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University, for the rehabilitation of missed single maxillary posterior tooth by an immediately loaded dental implants
16 dental implants were inserted in 16 patients were divided into two groups: Group A: 8 dental implants were inserted using undersized drilling technique and Group B: 8 dental implants were inserted using single drilling technique. then the dental implants were assessed for 6 months regarding
Clinical Evalution: regarding these parameters after immediately dental implants loading,3 months and 6 months.
implant stability, implant probing depth, bleeding index.
Radiographic evaluation: immediately after implant loading and 6 months after loading regarding bone density and marginal bone loss.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Group A dental implant placement by undersized drilling technique. | Experimental | 8 dental implants placed in the healed alveolar posterior maxillary ridge using undersized drilling technique |
|
| Group B dental implant placement by single drilling technique | Experimental | 8 dental implants placed in the healed alveolar posterior maxillary ridge using singledrilling technique |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| undersized drilling technique | Procedure | In group A The implant site preparation was made according to the protocol of the manufacturer except that the final drill was omitted. The drilling was done using a low speed reduction, high torque with coolant contra-angle hand piece with surgical motor unit. Speed of drilling was 800-1200 rpm. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| bone density measurement | cbct will be done to evaluate difference in bone density | 6 month |
| marginal bone loss | cbct will be done to evaluate marginal bone loss | 6 month |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heba Elsheikh | Al Mansurah | Egypt |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000848 | Anodontia |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D014071 | Tooth Abnormalities |
| D018640 | Stomatognathic System Abnormalities |
| D009057 | Stomatognathic Diseases |
| D014076 | Tooth Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| single drilling technique | Procedure | In group B The implant bed was prepared using the new specially designed drills. First, the use of the guide drill of length 3.5mm with speed of 800 rpm and torque of 35 nm, then the use of the one drill of the same diameter of the selected implant size to the full length of the osteotomy site. |
|
| D000013 | Congenital Abnormalities |
| D009358 | Congenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities |