Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
"Recently, virtual reality has become more accessible thanks to the use of smaller, more comfortable and easier-to-use devices. Its use in operating theatres is growing.
However, despite the clinical effectiveness of virtual reality in reducing pain and anxiety, there are very few feedback studies from patients on their experience of surgery and their satisfaction, especially in orthopaedics.
The aim of this study is to demonstrate the superiority, during long awake orthopaedic surgery, of equipping the patient with a virtual reality headset, on patient satisfaction, compared with the same surgery without a headset.
The visual support offered will be appropriate to the duration of the surgery, i.e. more than 1 hour."
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| orthopaedic surgery (goup 1 control) | 30 individuals installed according to the usual procedures for an orthopaedic surgery |
| |
| orthopaedic surgery and fitted with a virtual reality headset (group 2 case) | 30 individuals installed according to the usual procedures for an orthopaedic surgery and fitted with a virtual reality headset |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| orthopaedic surgery | Other | usual procedures for an orthopaedic surgery |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| To demonstrate the superiority, during long awake orthopaedic surgery, of equipping the patient with a virtual reality headset, on patient satisfaction, compared with the same surgery without a headset. | Patient satisfaction with their surgical experience. This will be measured using a Likert scale, graduated from 0 to 10, with 0 being the minimum and 10 the maximum. | Immediate post-operative |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| 1. To demonstrate the superiority, during long awake orthopaedic surgery, of equipping the patient with a virtual reality headset, on the doses of premedication, compared with the same surgeries without headset. | 1. The number and doses of Midazolam (in mg) received in the two distinct groups will make it possible to evaluate the effectiveness of virtual reality from a pharmaceutical point of view. A difference in the use of pharmaceutical therapeutics of 20% less in patients with VR is expected to be significant. If the difference is less, the doses of premedication used in the two groups will be compared in order to assess the positive impact of VR. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Major patients admitted for total hip or knee replacement surgery and whose anaesthetic management is by loco-regional anaesthesia
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHU NiICE | Nice | Alpes Maritimes | 0600 | France |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| orthopaedic surgery and fitted with a virtual reality headset | Other | usual procedures for an orthopaedic surgery and fitted with a virtual reality headset |
|
| Immediate post-operative |
| Evaluate the Virtual Reality device in terms of comfort when wearing the headset, visual comfort and image and scenario quality, and auditory quality | 2. VR evaluated using a Likert scale from 0 to as well as an open-ended questionnaire evaluating (isolation from noise pollution, possibility of communicating with nursing staff, quality of audio transmitted) : The comfort of wearing the helmet Visual comfort, image and scenario quality Hearing quality (isolation from noise pollution, ability to communicate with nursing staff, quality of audio transmitted) | Immediate post-operative |