Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1R01NS125386-01 | U.S. NIH Grant/Contract | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, El Paso | OTHER |
| University of Pittsburgh | OTHER |
| National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) | NIH |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The investigators propose to advance Vim-FUSA (Ventral Intermediate Nucleus - Focused Ultrasound Ablation) with the support of 3-D tractography, a neuroimaging technique to visually represent nerve tracts within the brain. The investigators hypothesize that 3-D tractography Vim-FUSA will improve the Vim ablation compared to standard Vim-FUSA and prove safe and feasible in the clinical setting. The investigators also hypothesize that intraoperative magnetic resonance (i-MR) monitoring will differentiate ablated tissue from immediate perilesional edema and accurately predict the Vim-FUSA clinical outcomes.
Essential tremor (ET) is a common neurological disorder and a leading cause of functional and psychological disabilities that can be difficult to suppress with oral medications, many of which have considerable side effects limiting adequate dosing. As a result, up to 20% of ET patients cannot achieve satisfactory control of their symptoms and must consider interventional options. Focused ultrasound ablation (FUSA) of the ventral intermediate nucleus (Vim) is an FDA-approved and Medicare-reimbursed procedure for ET resistant to medications that can selectively ablate the brain area associated with tremor without the need for surgical incisions or anesthesia. The success of Vim-FUSA depends on the ability to accurately ablate 70% of the Vim volume without lesioning neighboring structures, a goal that is complicated by technical challenges in three critical phases of the procedure: planning (identifying the Vim location and extension); delivery (ablating the Vim volume with adequate accuracy); and monitoring (confirming Vim ablation with reliable intraoperative imaging). The investigators propose to advance Vim-FUSA with the support of 3-D tractography, a neuroimaging technique to visually represent nerve tracts within the brain. The investigators hypothesize that 3-D tractography Vim-FUSA will improve the Vim ablation compared to standard Vim-FUSA and prove safe and feasible in the clinical setting. The investigators also hypothesize that intraoperative magnetic resonance (i-MR) monitoring will differentiate ablated tissue from immediate perilesional edema and accurately predict the Vim-FUSA clinical outcomes. Aim 1. Estimate and characterize the improvement in Vim ablation achieved with 3-D tractography Vim-FUSA vs. standard Vim-FUSA in an experimental controlled animal study. Through an experimental animal study, the investigators will characterize the Vim ablation delivered with 3-D tractography Vim-FUSA in one hemisphere (experimental group) vs. standard Vim-FUSA in the opposite hemisphere (control group). Aim 2. Test safety, feasibility, and preliminary efficacy, and estimate effect size of 3-D tractography Vim-FUSA in a phase-II, two-groups, pre-post interventional human study. In a human study, the investigators will test the safety and feasibility of ablating 70% of the Vim volume while checking for side effects with intraoperative clinical testing. Tremor assessments will be videotaped at baseline and 12 weeks and compared, in a blinded fashion, with age-sex matched controls randomly selected from the video repository of the two FDA-regulated studies of standard Vim-FUSA at baseline and 12 weeks. Aim 3 (Exploratory). Assess the accuracy of i-MR in differentiating tissue ablation from immediate perilesional edema and its utility in predicting Vim-FUSA clinical outcomes. In the experimental animal study, the investigators will estimate and compare the accuracy of conventional and non-conventional i-MR in differentiating tissue necrosis from perilesional edema. In the interventional human study, the investigators will evaluate the utility of i-MR in predicting Vim-FUSA clinical outcomes
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3-D Tractography Vim FUSA | Experimental | Twenty-four consecutive essential tremor (ET) participants undergoing Vim FUSA using 3-D tractography will be assessed at baseline and Month 3. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MR-guided Focused Ultrasound Ablation | Device | 3-D tractography Vim-FUSA -D tractography Vim-FUSA will be carried out as follows: (a) head shaving and placement of the stereotactic frame (Integra radionics frame, Integra Lifesciences, NJ, USA) secured to the skull with transcutaneous screws; (b) positioning on the procedure table and placement of the ultrasound transducer; (c) acquisition of conventional magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and co-registration with the CT head and 3-D tractography imaging acquired pre-surgically; (d) exploration of the target area with subtherapeutic sonications; (e) intraoperative monitoring with clinical testing of tremor and side effects with a standardized protocol. (f) Therapeutic sonications in the target area to deliver definitive ablation followed by clinical testing of tremor and side effects with a standardized protocol as described in section (e). |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants without Side Effects | Feasibility is defined as the ability to complete the procedure without side effects. | during the surgical procedure |
| Absolute Change in Tremor | The absolute change from baseline to Month 3 follow-up in upper extremity Tremor-Motor scores for the treated side is a sub-scale of Clinical Rating Scale for Tremor (CRST) Part A and Part B sum used to measure treated-side upper extremity tremor changes over time. Tremor-motor scores range from 0-32 points. Individual subject's scores at Baseline and 3 Months used to calculate absolute change from baseline and averaged across subjects. High absolute change from baseline is better (shows improvement). | Baseline, Month 3 |
| Relative Change in Tremor | The relative change from baseline to Month 3 follow-up in upper extremity Tremor-Motor scores for the treated side is a sub-scale of Clinical Rating Scale for Tremor (CRST) Part A and Part B sum used to measure treated-side upper extremity tremor changes over time. Tremor-motor scores range from 0-32 points. Individual subject's scores at Baseline and 3 Months used to calculate relative change from baseline and averaged across subjects. High relative change from baseline is better (shows improvement). | Baseline, Month 3 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants with Procedure-Related Side Effects | Prevalence and severity of procedure-related side effects measured by the following: ataxia (SARA), speech disturbance (VHI), sensory loss (SWME), muscle weakness (MRC) | 3 months after the surgical procedure |
| Relative Change in Tremor-Related Quality of Life |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Tremor Based on Video Assessment | Upper extremity tremors will be measured by video recording using i-Phone set-up. | Baseline, during the surgical procedure |
| Change in Gait Based on Video Assessment |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vibhor Krishna, MD | Contact | +1(919)-445-2410 | vibhor_krishna@med.unc.edu | |
| Victoria Scott | Contact | 919-966-0864 | Victoria_Scott@med.unc.edu |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Vibhor Krishna, MD | University of North Carolina at Chapel Hll | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill | Recruiting | Chapel Hill | North Carolina | 27599 | United States |
De-identified individual data that supports the results will be shared beginning 9 to 36 months following publication provided the investigator who proposes to use the data has approval from an Institutional Review Board (IRB), Independent Ethics Committee (IEC), or Research Ethics Board (REB), as applicable, and executes a data use/sharing agreement with UNC.
Beginning 9 and continuing for 36 months following publication
Investigator has approved IRB, IEC REB and an executed data use/sharing agreement with UNC.
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D020329 | Essential Tremor |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009069 | Movement Disorders |
| D002493 | Central Nervous System Diseases |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
|
The Quality of Life Essential Tremor Questionnaire (QUEST) will be used to assess tremor-related quality of life. QUEST has scores ranging from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating worse disability. |
| 3 months after the surgical procedure |
| Number of Participants Who Are Satisfied with Treatment | Measured using a single question asking about patient satisfaction ranging from 1 to 5 with higher scores indicating higher satisfaction. | 3 months after the surgical procedure |
Gait will be measured by video recording using i-Phone set-up.
| Baseline, during the surgical procedure |