Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Actual CT scanners overestimate stapes piston size, and do not represent a valuable technique for their follow-up, especially in case of complication. Ultra-high resolution has not yet been evaluated in this setting.
Modern temporal bone imaging systems, using 0.5 mm slice thickness, are reputed not yet able to depict the stapes piston position with a sufficient degree of accuracy, as high-resolution CT measurements consistently overestimated intravestibular piston dimensions (width by 44%, length by 6.25%) and vestibular intrusion (by 39%) because of metallic artifacts. . The exact limits of intravestibular depth are also unclear. The "safe" intravestibular prosthesis depth varies widely between studies and has been reported to range from 0.2 to 2.5 mm, so 39% may represent up to 0.9 mm of misestimation. Ultra-high resolution CT (UHR-CT) has improved spatial resolution to 0.12 mm by using ultra-small detector elements (0.25 x 0.25 mm), allowing better visualization of temporal bone structures compared to high-resolution temporal bone CT (HR-CT). However, this technique has not been described for stapes prosthesis measurement.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| patients who underwent stapes surgery at our instution | patients with otosclerosis who underwent stapedectomy in our institution |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| stapedectomy | Procedure | stapes removal and replacement by a prosthesis |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| length | length of the prosthesis on CT | february 2020 - novembre 2023 |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
- stapes prosthesis Ultra-high resolution CT available
Exclusion Criteria:
no materiovigilance report available
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
patients with otosclerosis who underwent stapes replacement by a prosthesis and underwent ultra high resolution CT for follow-up
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| romain gillet, md | Contact | 00.33680987216 | r.gillet@chru-nancy.fr |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| romain gillet | CHRU de Nancy | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chu Nancy | Nancy | 54000 | France |
|
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19727746 | Background | Bozzato A, Struffert T, Hertel V, Iro H, Hornung J. Analysis of the accuracy of high-resolution computed tomography techniques for the measurement of stapes prostheses. Eur Radiol. 2010 Mar;20(3):566-71. doi: 10.1007/s00330-009-1582-4. Epub 2009 Sep 2. | |
| 26927761 | Background | Fang Y, Wang B, Galvin JJ 3rd, Tao D, Deng R, Ou X, Liu Y, Dai P, Sha Y, Zhang T, Chen B. MPR-CT Imaging for Stapes Prosthesis: Accuracy and Clinical Significance. Otol Neurotol. 2016 Apr;37(4):321-3. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000987. |
Not provided
Not provided
because CT-scanner are the patient's proprety
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010040 | Otosclerosis |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D004427 | Ear Diseases |
| D010038 | Otorhinolaryngologic Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D013201 | Stapes Surgery |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D013506 | Otologic Surgical Procedures |
| D013517 | Otorhinolaryngologic Surgical Procedures |
| D013514 | Surgical Procedures, Operative |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ultra high resolution CT | Radiation | imaging study |
|
| 31298596 | Background | Gil Mun S, Scheffner E, Muller S, Mittmann P, Rademacher G, Mutze S, Wilms K, Boga E, Bjorn Gehl H, Sudhoff H, Todt I. Stapes piston insertion depth and clinical correlations. Acta Otolaryngol. 2019 Oct;139(10):829-832. doi: 10.1080/00016489.2019.1637019. Epub 2019 Jul 12. |