Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Since the outbreak of COVID-19, students; sports environment and time have been severely compressed, which has had an unprecedented impact on their physical fitness and sports learning attitude. Therefore, it is urgent to adopt an effective teaching mode that aligns with curriculum reform to improve students; physical quality and learning attitude. The Sports Education Model is one of the most popular teaching models in Western developed countries, but the application in China and the related evidence of improving students; physical quality and learning attitude towards sports are relatively scarce. This study compares and analyzes the influence of the Sports Education Model and Traditional Teaching on junior middle school students; physical fitness and learning attitude, aiming to provide theoretical support for improving students; physical fitness and learning attitude and promoting the Sports Education Model in China. Promote the healthy development of junior middle school students.
In the study, the experimental group underwent a 12-week soccer program based on the Sport Education Model instructional intervention designed for this research. In contrast, the control group discussed and studied traditional soccer teaching content for 12 weeks with their teachers. Employing a Cluster randomized controlled experiment design, the experimental and control groups were randomly assigned to two different schools. Students participated in the Sport Education Model (experimental group) and traditional teaching (control group) sessions three times a week, each lasting 40 minutes (totaling 120 minutes per week). Physical fitness tests and responses to the Students' Attitudes Toward Physical Education Scale (SPEA) were conducted for both groups before the start of the first week. After 12 weeks of instruction, both groups were required to undergo physical fitness tests and respond to the Students' Attitudes Toward Physical Education Scale once again.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sport Eucation Curriculum | Experimental | The Teaching experiment period of the Sport Education Model was 12 weeks, 40 minutes per lesson which included warm-up (10 minutes), basic content (20 minutes), rest of basic content (5 minutes), and cool-down (5 minutes). |
|
| Normal Teaching | Active Comparator | The Teaching experiment period of Normal Teaching was 12 weeks, 40 minutes per lesson which included warm-up (10-min), basic content (20min), rest of basic content (5min), and cool-down (5min). Normal Teaching includes Teacher-directed learning (10 minutes) and Individual practice (10 minutes). |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sport Education Curriculum | Behavioral | The six characteristics of The Sport Education Model include season, affiliation, formal competition, culminating event, Record-keeping, and Festivity. The intensity of the training is increasing in the first 30 minutes, and the intensity is gradually decreasing in the next 10 minutes. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Cardiovascular fitness test | Equipment: Soccer field, cones, tape measure, Yo-Yo test software. Procedure: Warm-up, group athletes, select appropriate mode, shuttle runs between cones with increasing speed, complete each run between beeps, record last completed run, measure total distance in meters (m). | Pretest: before experiment; post-test1: end of 6 weeks; post-test2: end of 12 weeks |
| Flexibility test | Equipment: Sit and reach box. Procedure: Participant sits, feet against box, knees extended, bends forward reaching forward with fingertips, measure maximum range without sudden force, knees remain extended, retest if technical issues, measure in centimeters (cm). | Pretest: before experiment; post-test1: end of 6 weeks; post-test2: end of 12 weeks |
| Speed test | Equipment: Soccer field, tape measure, timing gates or stopwatch, cones or poles. Procedure: Thoroughly warm up, sprint 30 meters twice, record the best time, calculated in seconds (s). | Pretest: before experiment; post-test1: end of 6 weeks; post-test2: end of 12 weeks |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
The experimental subjects were students from two junior high schools in Haigang District, Qinhuangdao City, Hebei province. Before enrolling subjects, researchers need to inform them of the proposed study and what they need to participate in. After the subject is informed, the subject is allowed to ask questions. The various criteria and requirements for participation in this study were explained during the meeting. The criteria for inclusion of potential participants are as follows:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Junlong Zhang, PHD | Contact | 0397698153 | zhangjunlong2413@gmail.com | |
| Soh Kim Geok, Professor | Contact | 0397698153 | kims@upm.edu.my |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Junlong Zhang | University Putra Malaysia | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The 19th Middle School | Recruiting | Qinhuangdao | Hebei | 066000 | China |
Since this is my doctoral thesis experiment, I won't share it until I graduate.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Employing a Cluster randomized controlled experiment design, the experimental and control groups were randomly assigned to two different schools. Students participated in the Sport Education Model (experimental group) and traditional teaching (control group).
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Normal teaching | Behavioral | The intervention content, frequency, and intensity were the same as those in the experimental group, but the type of intervention was different. The most significant difference between the two teaching methods lies in delivering basic content. The Sport Education Model includes Teacher-directed learning (10 minutes) and Team practice (10 minutes); Normal Teaching includes Teacher-directed learning (10 minutes) and Individual practice (10 minutes). |
|