Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The aim of this study is to assess and describe the utilization of Mepilex® Border Flex and other foam dressings available in routine clinical practice in the management of patients with chronic wounds, in order to understand the pattern of use and the frequency of dressing changes in wound management. The study will also allow to gain information about the opinion of the HCPs and the patient's experience concerning wound management with foam dressings. This information may help to understand patient's health care optimization in terms of quality and efficiency.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Study Group | Mepilex Border Flex dressing changes |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mepilex Border Flex | Device | Usage of Mepilex Border Flex according to intended use and standard of care. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Dressing use | Number of dressings used the week before baseline visit compared to the number of dressings used the week before follow-up visit. | 4 weeks |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Wound characteristics | Describe clinical characteristics of chronic wounds that are treated with foam dressings in routine clinical practice by HCP assessment | 4 weeks |
| Wound management | Describe the management of chronic wounds in terms of frequency of dressing change, type of dressings used and reason for dressing change |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study is addressed to adult patients with chronic wounds- wounds that have not reduced in size by more than 40% to 50% or healed within a month, and who are already being treated with a foam dressing. The patient must be deemed by HPC to be treated with Mepilex® Border Flex according to the indications of the dressing.
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fia Navntoft | Contact | +46 31-722 30 00 | fia.navntoft@molnlycke.com |
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CS Ciudad Expo - Mairena de Aljarafe | Recruiting | Seville | Andalusia | 41927 | Spain |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D014947 | Wounds and Injuries |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| 4 weeks |
| Technical Performance (HCP evaluation) | Several questions will be asked to evaluate the technical performance properties of the primary dressing. The following will be assessed by the investigator/designee using no/yes values: 1) Based on this patient, would you recommend Mepilex Border Flex for use in your organisation? All other properties will be assessed by the investigator/designee using a 3-item scale of worse, same, better. These include:
| 4 weeks |
| Patient Experience (PRO) | Patients are asked to rate the dressings in regards their experience The following questions will be assessed by the investigator/designee using a 1-10 level visual analogue scale for pain:
The following will be assessed by the investigator/designee using no/yes values: *Would you recommend this treatment to a relative or friend? All other properties will be assessed by the investigator/designee using a 4-item scale of very poor, poor, good, very good. These include:
| 4 weeks |
| Costs | Estimate the weekly cost per patient associated with the dressings used in wound care episodes and the characteristics of use by evaluating type and size of wound and frequency of dressing change | 4 weeks |