Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The objective is to compare the sagittal and vertical skeletal parameters of patients with an impacted third molar.
Patients will be analyzed according to their skeletal characteristics: skeletal class (sagittal direction) and facial skeletal typology (vertical direction).
The inclusion characteristics of third molars will also be analyzed, to see the links between typology and inclusion. The principal hypothesis is no significant difference in third molar inclusion patterns in relation to skeletal divergence.
The study is a non-interventional (observational) research involving the human person, research on existing data (retrospective study) and samples dealing with dentofacial orthopedics.
This study analyzes third molar inclusion patterns in relation with the skeletal characteristics, sagittal and vertical typology.
This is a comparative retrospective study of radiographs in three dimensions before any orthodontic treatment. The patients studied are at Bacchetti CS stage 5 (adults), and the third molar must be at least at Nolla stage 6 of formation.
There is no control group but there are subgroups depending of the skeletal characterics.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Class I | Patient with class I occlusion, with at least one impacted third molar |
| |
| Class II | Patients with class II malocclusion, with at least one impacted third molar |
| |
| Class III | Patients with class III malocclusion, with at least one impacted third molar |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Radiographic measurement | Other | Measurements taken on 3D radiographs, to assess third molar inclusion and skeletal typology (vertical and sagittal) |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Distance between the occlusal plane and the second molar | Depth of the third molar in mm | One day |
| Angle of the third molar | The coronal-radicular axis of the mandibular third molar, and the occlusal plane of the mandibular 1st and 2nd molars, when these are in a normal, functional position on the arch (in degrees) | One day |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
French adults with at least one impacted third molar
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bart VANDE VANNET, PhD | Contact | +32496284339 | bart.vande-vannet@univ-lorraine.fr | |
| Mathilde LAE | Contact | +33781893850 | mathildelae@hotmail.fr |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Bart VANDE VANNET, PhD | Central Hospital, Nancy, France | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Département d'Orthopédie dento-faciale | Recruiting | Nancy | 54000 | France |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 34025081 | Background | Idris AM, Al-Mashraqi AA, Abidi NH, Vani NV, Elamin EI, Khubrani YH, Sh Alhazmi A, Alamir AH, Fageeh HN, Meshni AA, Mashyakhy MH, Makrami AM, Gareeb Alla Abdalla A, Jafer M. Third molar impaction in the Jazan Region: Evaluation of the prevalence and clinical presentation. Saudi Dent J. 2021 May;33(4):194-200. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2020.02.004. Epub 2020 Mar 4. | |
| 23538430 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D014095 | Tooth, Impacted |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D014076 | Tooth Diseases |
| D009057 | Stomatognathic Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Costa MG, Pazzini CA, Pantuzo MC, Jorge ML, Marques LS. Is there justification for prophylactic extraction of third molars? A systematic review. Braz Oral Res. 2013 Mar-Apr;27(2):183-8. |
| 32589125 | Background | Hounsome J, Pilkington G, Mahon J, Boland A, Beale S, Kotas E, Renton T, Dickson R. Prophylactic removal of impacted mandibular third molars: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess. 2020 Jun;24(30):1-116. doi: 10.3310/hta24300. |
| 30380552 | Background | Tassoker M, Kok H, Sener S. Is There a Possible Association between Skeletal Face Types and Third Molar Impaction? A Retrospective Radiographic Study. Med Princ Pract. 2019;28(1):70-74. doi: 10.1159/000495005. Epub 2018 Oct 31. |
| 18486787 | Background | Legovic M, Legovic I, Brumini G, Vandura I, Cabov T, Ovesnik M, Mestrovic S, Slaj M, Skrinjaric A. Correlation between the pattern of facial growth and the position of the mandibular third molar. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008 Jun;66(6):1218-24. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2007.12.013. |
| 35466682 | Background | Aoun Y, Husseini B, Younes R, Ghosn N, Bouserhal J. Assessment of lower third molar space: A comparative radiographic study. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2022 Jul 1;51(5):20220049. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20220049. Epub 2022 May 4. |
| 22322503 | Background | Zamora N, Llamas JM, Cibrian R, Gandia JL, Paredes V. A study on the reproducibility of cephalometric landmarks when undertaking a three-dimensional (3D) cephalometric analysis. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2012 Jul 1;17(4):e678-88. doi: 10.4317/medoral.17721. |
| 34943528 | Background | Li C, Teixeira H, Tanna N, Zheng Z, Chen SHY, Zou M, Chung CH. The Reliability of Two- and Three-Dimensional Cephalometric Measurements: A CBCT Study. Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Dec 7;11(12):2292. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11122292. |
| 26561441 | Background | Carter K, Worthington S. Predictors of Third Molar Impaction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Dent Res. 2016 Mar;95(3):267-76. doi: 10.1177/0022034515615857. Epub 2015 Nov 11. |
| 37601239 | Background | Bin Rubaia'an MA, Neyaz A, Talic F, Alkhamis A, Alghabban A, Assari A. The Association Between Skeletal Facial Types and Third Molars Impaction in a Saudi Arabian Subpopulation: A CBCT Study. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2023 Aug 15;15:143-156. doi: 10.2147/CCIDE.S419325. eCollection 2023. |
| 12169031 | Background | Baccetti T, Franchi L, McNamara JA Jr. An improved version of the cervical vertebral maturation (CVM) method for the assessment of mandibular growth. Angle Orthod. 2002 Aug;72(4):316-23. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2002)0722.0.CO;2. |
| 6950638 | Background | Hagg U, Taranger J. Dental emergence stages and the pubertal growth spurt. Acta Odontol Scand. 1981;39(5):295-306. doi: 10.3109/00016358109162293. |
| 34188406 | Background | Hasan KM, Sobhana CR, Rawat SK, Singh D, Mongia P, Fakhruddin A. Third molar impaction in different facial types and mandibular length: A cross-sectional study. Natl J Maxillofac Surg. 2021 Jan-Apr;12(1):83-87. doi: 10.4103/njms.NJMS_111_20. Epub 2021 Mar 16. |
| 12166710 | Background | Mollaoglu N, Cetiner S, Gungor K. Patterns of third molar impaction in a group of volunteers in Turkey. Clin Oral Investig. 2002 Jun;6(2):109-13. doi: 10.1007/s00784-001-0144-1. |
| 34205078 | Background | Jaron A, Trybek G. The Pattern of Mandibular Third Molar Impaction and Assessment of Surgery Difficulty: A Retrospective Study of Radiographs in East Baltic Population. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jun 3;18(11):6016. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18116016. |
| 23229243 | Background | Hashemipour MA, Tahmasbi-Arashlow M, Fahimi-Hanzaei F. Incidence of impacted mandibular and maxillary third molars: a radiographic study in a Southeast Iran population. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2013 Jan 1;18(1):e140-5. doi: 10.4317/medoral.18028. |
| 30427496 | Background | Ahmed M, Shaikh A, Fida M. Diagnostic validity of different cephalometric analyses for assessment of the sagittal skeletal pattern. Dental Press J Orthod. 2018 Sep-Oct;23(5):75-81. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.23.5.075-081.oar. |