Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The goal of this clinical trial is to assess whether a brief case management intervention aimed at promoting personal recovery and reducing the negative effects of coercion among people involuntarily admitted to a psychiatric hospital would be well accepted by them, practically feasible and useful. The main questions it aims to answer are:
Participants will be asked to take part in:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intervention group | Experimental | Brief case management intervention group |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brief case management intervention | Other | The brief case management intervention aims to support patients during the difficult phase of involuntary hospitalisation and reduce the impact of this short-term event on their long-term recovery process. The intervention starts during the hospital stay, at the latest one week after admission, and lasts for a maximum of one month after discharge. The intervention consists of five sessions, the order of which may vary according to the specific needs of the patient:
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Eligibility rate | Number of eligible patients/number of patients involuntarily hospitalised on site during study period as reported in a structured flowchart by the case managers after each site visit | From start of study recruitment through study recruitment completion, on average 6 months |
| Participation rate | Number of patients accepting to participate/number of approached patients as reported in a structured flowchart by the case managers after each site visit and based on the number of signed consent forms | From start of study recruitment through study recruitment completion, on average 6 months |
| Drop-out rate | Number of patients who completed the programme/number of recruited patients as reported by case managers in a structured questionnaire detailing which intervention sessions were delivered to each patient | Post-intervention, up to 1 month post hospital discharge |
| Intervention dosage | Mean number of sessions delivered per participant as reported by case managers in a structured questionnaire detailing which intervention sessions were delivered to each patient | Post-intervention, up to 1 month post hospital discharge |
| Missing data rates | Percentage of missing data | At the end of the study, on average 9 months after the inclusion of the first participant |
| Number of unexpected adverse events | Number of unexpected adverse events related to the intervention reported in a structured form by the case managers or the investigator |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Recovery Assessment Scale (RAS) | The French validated version of the Recovery Assessment Scale (RAS), a 24-item, patient-oriented outcome inventory which assesses personal recovery on a five-point Likert scale ranging from 1="strongly disagree" to 5="strongly agree". The instrument provides a total score of personal recovery as well as sub-scores on five specific dimensions: personal confidence and hope, willingness to ask for help, goal and success orientation, reliance on others, no domination by symptoms. Both the total score and the five sub-scores are used in the study. Higher scores correspond to better recovery. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Charles Bonsack | Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, CHUV | Study Chair |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lausanne University Hospital | Lausanne | Canton of Vaud | 1003 | Switzerland |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Date | Date Unknown |
|---|---|---|
| Release | Apr 28, 2026 | |
| Reset | May 20, 2026 |
Not provided
Not provided
| Release Date | Unrelease Date | Unrelease Date Unknown | Reset Date | MCP Release Number |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 28, 2026 | May 20, 2026 | |||
| Jun 22, 2026 |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001523 | Mental Disorders |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Up to 1 week after hospital admission through up to 1 month post hospital discharge |
| Participants' acceptance and degree of satisfaction | Participants' acceptance and degree of satisfaction with both the intervention and the research process qualitatively assessed through semi-structured interviews | Post-intervention, up to 1 month post hospital discharge |
| Implementation barriers and facilitating factors | Barriers and facilitating factors encountered throughout the implementation process as described by some members of the hospital team, during in-depth semi-structured interviews. | After the last included participant final evaluation, on average 8 months after the inclusion of the first participant |
| Two time points assessment: up to 1 week after hospital admission (pre-intervention) and up to 1 month post hospital discharge (post-intervention) |
| Empowerment Scale | The validated Empowerment Scale, a 28-item measure assessing personal empowerment as defined by mental health service-users on a four-point Likert scale ranging from "strongly disagree" to "strongly agree". The total score is used for the study. Higher scores correspond to higher empowerment. | Two time points assessment: up to 1 week after hospital admission (pre-intervention) and up to 1 month post hospital discharge (post-intervention) |
| Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSS) | The French validated version of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSS), a very short 10-item inventory measuring self-esteem on a four-point Likert scale from 1="strongly disagree" to 4="strongly agree". The RSS total score may range between 10 and 40, with higher scores indicating higher level of self-esteem. | Two time points assessment: up to 1 week after hospital admission (pre-intervention) and up to 1 month post hospital discharge (post-intervention) |
| The Paradox of Self-Stigma scale (PaSS-24) | The Paradox of Self-Stigma scale (PaSS-24), a short French-language scale measuring self-stigma and its three related construct of stereotype endorsement, righteous anger and non-disclosure. It includes 24 items rated on a five-point Likert scale ranging between 1="strongly disagree" and 5="strongly agree". The three sub-scores are used in the study. | Two time points assessment: up to 1 week after hospital admission (pre-intervention) and up to 1 month post hospital discharge (post-intervention) |
| Beck Hopelessness Scale (BHS) | The French validated version of the Beck Hopelessness Scale (BHS), an inventory of 20 true-false items which assess negative expectations about the future on three dimensions: feeling about the future, decrease in motivation and expectations. BHS total score can range between 0 and 20, with higher scores reflecting higher levels of hopelessness. | Two time points assessment: up to 1 week after hospital admission (pre-intervention) and up to 1 month post hospital discharge (post-intervention) |
| WHOQOL-BREF | The French validated version of the WHOQOL-BREF, a scale including 26 Likert type items, measuring quality of life in four domains: physical health, psychological health, social relationships and environment. Its total score is used in the study. | Two time points assessment: up to 1 week after hospital admission (pre-intervention) and up to 1 month post hospital discharge (post-intervention) |
| International Trauma Questionnaire (ITQ) | The French validated version of the International Trauma Questionnaire (ITQ), a scale to assess Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) and Complex Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (C-PTSD) symptoms among adults. The inventory includes 18 items: six to assess the PTSD, six to assess the Disorders in Self Organisation (DSO), and six to assess functional impairment in several important areas of life. Respondents are required to indicate, on a five-point scale from 0="not at all" to 4="extremely", how much each symptom has bothered them in the past month. A total score, ranging between 0 and 24, can be calculated for the PTSD and DSO subscale. A C-PTSD score, ranging between 0 and 48, can also be calculated by adding the PTSD and DSO subscales. Both the PTSD and the C-PTSD total scores will be used in the study. | Two time points assessment: up to 1 week after hospital admission (pre-intervention) and up to 1 month post hospital discharge (post-intervention) |
| Coercion Ladder (CL) | The Coercion Ladder (CL), a single-item instrument asking patients to rate their experience of care on a visual analogue scale ranging from 1="minimum use of coercion" to 10="maximum use of coercion". | Two time points assessment: up to 1 week after hospital admission (pre-intervention) and up to 1 month post hospital discharge (post-intervention) |
| Index of fairness and Index of effectiveness | The Index of fairness and the Index of effectiveness, two self-administered inventories which assess if participants perceived the experienced treatment pressures as fair and effective. The indices include four items each, rated on a five-point Likert scale from 1="strongly disagree" to 5="strongly agree". The two indices total scores are used in the study. Higher scores indicate higher perceived fairness and effectiveness. | Two time points assessment: up to 1 week after hospital admission (pre-intervention) and up to 1 month post hospital discharge (post-intervention) |
| Satisfaction with hospital care | The Satisfaction with hospital care questionnaire, a six-item tool developed by the Swiss National Association for Quality Development in hospitals and clinics (ANQ), assessing patients' satisfaction about quality of treatment, information and communication, medication, patient's implication and discharge preparation, on a five-point Likert scale. The total score of global satisfaction is used in the study. Higher score corresponds to higher satisfaction. Moreover, the ANQ questionnaire includes one-item subscale on five-point assessing répondeurs' self-reported health. This subscale is also used in the study. | Two time points assessment: up to 1 week after hospital admission (pre-intervention) and up to 1 month post hospital discharge (post-intervention) |
| Brief INSPIRE scale | The Brief INSPIRE scale, a service user-rated measure assessing perceived staff support for personal recovery. The Brief INSPIRE consists of five items, one for each personal recovery domain. Responders are asked to rate on a five-point Likert scale, from 0="not at all" to 4="very much", how much they feel supported by staff in each domain of their personal recovery. A total score between 0 and 100 can be computed, with higher scores indicating higher perceived support. | Post-intervention, up to 1 month post hospital discharge |