Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The overall goal of the SMC is to help reduce posttraumatic stress symptomology for pregnant persons with a history of trauma.
The study is a pilot randomized waitlist-controlled trial that examines the preliminary efficacy of the SMC for reducing PTSD symptomology as compared to a waitlist control group. Also, it aims to assess the feasibility and acceptability of the SMC. It examines how changes in the theorized mechanisms (emotion regulation, interpersonal sensitivity) mediate the relationship between the intervention and PTSD symptomology.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Survivor Mom Companion Program | Active Comparator | Participants in the Survivor Moms' Companion intervention will complete a minimum of 4 Survivor Moms' Companion psychoeducational modules with weekly tutor support and will then complete an ending assessment. Sessions with tutors are conducted over the phone or in person at the Buffalo Prenatal and Perinatal Network and last for 45 minutes. |
|
| Waitlist Control | Placebo Comparator | Participants in the waitlist control group will complete the baseline assessment over the phone, wait six weeks, and then complete the ending assessment. Those on the waitlist will then be offered the Survivor Moms' Companion intervention. Sessions with tutors are conducted over the phone or in person at the Buffalo Prenatal and Perinatal Network and last for 45 minutes. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Survivor Mom Companion | Other | Weekly intervention sessions will follow the survivor Moms' Companion manualized modules. One module each week. The module centers on reinforcement of information introduced in each previous module, then emotional support, and referrals to additional services or specialists as needed. Participants in each session will practice applying knowledge and skills using the module's vignettes. Process guides prompt inquiry about in vivo management of post-traumatic stress disorder reactions and emotional and interpersonal responses to events since the last session. Each module may require 45 minutes of self-study before each session and 45 minutes of in-session time spent with the interventionist. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Childhood Trauma Questionnaire | For eligibility screening we will use the 5 sentinel items from the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire. The higher the score is, the greater the severity of abuse for that scale. There are four categories of severity for each trauma type: None (minimal); Low (to Moderate); Moderate (to Severe); and Severe (to Extreme). | This will be administered prior to the intervention as part of the starting assessment. |
| Primary Care Post Traumatic Stress Disorder Screen for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-5 | The Primary Care post-traumatic stress Screen for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders is a 5-item screen designed to identify individuals with probable post-traumatic stress disorder. Primary Care Post Traumatic Stress Disorder considered "positive" if the respondent answers "yes" to any 3 items in the questions listed in the scale. | This will be administered at the prior to the intervention as part of the starting assessment. |
| Adverse Childhood Experiences Questionnaire | Scale to assess the presence of childhood trauma. If the Adverse childhood experience score is 1-3 without Adverse Childhood Experience, the responder is at "intermediate risk" for toxic stress. If the Adverse childhood experience score is 1-3 and there is the likelihood of at least one Adverse childhood experience-associated condition, or if the Adverse childhood experiences score is 4 or higher, the responder is at "high risk" for toxic stress. | This will be administered prior to the intervention as part of the starting assessment. |
| Post Traumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders | Scale to assess presence of post-traumatic stress symptoms. Severity can be determined adding scores of each item together to determine a total score. A total score of 33 or higher may indicate severe post-traumatic stress disorder. | This will be administered prior to the intervention as part of the starting assessment and repeated after the intervention to assess any changes. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Patient Health Questionnaire-9 | A multipurpose instrument for screening and measuring severity of depression. In the scale 1-4 = minimal depression, 5-9 = mild depression, 10-14 = moderate depression, 15-19 = moderately severe depression and 20-27= severe depression. Thus, the higher the total score the higher the perceived level of depression. | This will be administered prior to the intervention as part of the starting assessment and repeated after the intervention to assess any changes. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Participants will self-identify.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Mickey Sperlich, PhD | State University of New York at Buffalo | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Buffalo Prenatal-Perinatal Network | Buffalo | New York | 14203 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12615092 | Background | Bernstein DP, Stein JA, Newcomb MD, Walker E, Pogge D, Ahluvalia T, Stokes J, Handelsman L, Medrano M, Desmond D, Zule W. Development and validation of a brief screening version of the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire. Child Abuse Negl. 2003 Feb;27(2):169-90. doi: 10.1016/s0145-2134(02)00541-0. | |
| 27170304 | Background |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | Aug 28, 2023 | Mar 15, 2024 | Prot_SAP_000.pdf |
| ICF | No | No | Yes | Informed Consent Form | Aug 28, 2023 | Mar 15, 2024 | ICF_001.pdf |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Dissociative Subtype of Post Traumatic Stress Scale | Scale to assess dissociative symptoms. Each item on the measure is rated on a 5-point scale (0=Not at all; 1=Once or twice; 2=Almost every day; 3=About once a day, and 4=More than once a day). The total score can range from 0 to 32, with higher scores indicating greater severity of dissociative experiences. | This will be administered prior to the intervention as part of the starting assessment and repeated after the intervention to assess any changes. |
| State Trait Anger Expression Inventory | A psychometric assessment that measures the experience and control of anger. scores are classified as "no or low anxiety" (20-37), "moderate anxiety" (38-44), and "high anxiety" (45-80). A higher score signifies higher anxiety. | This will be administered prior to the intervention as part of the starting assessment and repeated after the intervention to assess any changes. |
| Symptoms Checklist-90 Revised/Interpersonal Sensitivity Subscale | Instrument help evaluate a broad range of psychological problem symptoms. Using a five-point scale ranging from "not at all" to "extremely", each item assesses the severity of distress the respondent experienced in the last 7 days. Each item is graded from 1 to 5 according to the severity (none, mild, moderate, severe and extreme). The scores of the items were regarded as extreme when the total is between 30-36. | This will be administered prior to the intervention as part of the starting assessment and repeated after the intervention to assess any changes. |
| Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale Short Form | Covers four dimensions of emotional regulation; awareness and understanding of emotions, acceptance of emotions and the ability to engage in goal-directed behavior. All subscales are scored so that higher values reflect greater difficulty with emotion regulation. | This will be administered prior to the intervention as part of the starting assessment and repeated after the intervention to assess any changes. |
| Prins A, Bovin MJ, Smolenski DJ, Marx BP, Kimerling R, Jenkins-Guarnieri MA, Kaloupek DG, Schnurr PP, Kaiser AP, Leyva YE, Tiet QQ. The Primary Care PTSD Screen for DSM-5 (PC-PTSD-5): Development and Evaluation Within a Veteran Primary Care Sample. J Gen Intern Med. 2016 Oct;31(10):1206-11. doi: 10.1007/s11606-016-3703-5. Epub 2016 May 11. |
| 26606250 | Background | Blevins CA, Weathers FW, Davis MT, Witte TK, Domino JL. The Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5): Development and Initial Psychometric Evaluation. J Trauma Stress. 2015 Dec;28(6):489-98. doi: 10.1002/jts.22059. Epub 2015 Nov 25. |
| 26603115 | Background | Wolf EJ, Mitchell KS, Sadeh N, Hein C, Fuhrman I, Pietrzak RH, Miller MW. The Dissociative Subtype of PTSD Scale: Initial Evaluation in a National Sample of Trauma-Exposed Veterans. Assessment. 2017 Jun;24(4):503-516. doi: 10.1177/1073191115615212. Epub 2015 Nov 23. |
| 11556941 | Background | Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med. 2001 Sep;16(9):606-13. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x. |
| Background | Spielberger CD. Professional manual for the State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory-2 (STAXI-2). Odessa,FL: Psychological Assessment Resources; 1999. |
| Background | Derogatis LR, Lipman RS, Covi L. SCL-90. Administration, scoring and procedures manual-I for the R (revised) version and other instruments of the Psychopathology Rating Scales Series. Chicago: Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine; 1977. |
| 41522882 | Background | Kaufman EA, Xia M, Fosco G, Yaptangco M, Skidmore CR, Crowell SE. The Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale Short Form (DERS-SF): Validation and Replication in Adolescent and Adult Samples. J Psychopathol Behav Assess. 2016 Sep;38(3):443-455. doi: 10.1007/s10862-015-9529-3. Epub 2015 Nov 23. |
| 28480521 | Background | Kelly PJ, Kyngdon F, Ingram I, Deane FP, Baker AL, Osborne BA. The Client Satisfaction Questionnaire-8: Psychometric properties in a cross-sectional survey of people attending residential substance abuse treatment. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2018 Jan;37(1):79-86. doi: 10.1111/dar.12522. Epub 2017 May 7. |