Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Ankle fracture is one of the most common orthopedic injuries. Approximately, 20% of surgically treated ankle fractures are associated with syndesmotic instability.According to the mechanism of the injury the syndesmotic disruption should be considered in Danis-Weber C-type fractures. However, such injuries were also frequently seen in Danis-Weber B-type fractures. Failure to detect and repair syndesmotic injuries early may result in poor clinical outcomes and complications affecting ankle function, such as long-term residual pain, post traumatic arthritis, and ankle impingement syndromes. Therefore, aggressive treatment is important when facing syndesmotic instability .
The distal tibiofibular syndesmosis is important for stability of the ankle mortise and thus for weight transmission and walking. Syndesmotic injuries are most commonly associated with fibular fractures, but they can also occur in isolation or with damage to the lateral ankle ligament after traumatic supination. The need for syndesmotic fixation of the distal tibiofibular joint has been controversia. fracture does not correlate reliably with the extent of the interosseous membrane tears identified on MRI of ankle fractures, and thus estimation of the integrity of the interosseous membrane and subsequent need for trans-syndesmotic fixation cannot be based solely on the level of the fibular fracture. An intraoperative syndesmotic stress test can establish the presence or absence of syndesmotic instability, evaluating the integrity of the syndesmosis by grasping the stabilised fibula with a hook or clamp and pulling it laterally. If more than 3 or 4 mm of lateral displacement occurs, syndesmotic fixation is necessary.
Most authors recommend surgical placement of a trans-fixation screw after anatomical reduction of the syndesmosis if a disruption is diagnosed to avoid complications.The main aims of treatment for dislocation of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis are to restore the original anatomy and normal function and to recreate the stability of the ankle joint. The syndesmosis is traditionally fixed with a metallic screw, which is a method that has been used for decades and demonstrates good to excellent outcomes.
Some surgeons prefer Fixation of syndesmosis with screw in maximum ankle dorsiflexion and others prefer fixation in neutral position of ankle.in this study we are going to compare between these two
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| group A | Active Comparator | group(A) cases with ankle in neutral position during syndesmosis fixation |
|
| group B | Active Comparator | group(B) cases with ankle in dorsiflexion position during syndesmosis fixation |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| syndesmosis fixation with screws | Procedure | syndesmosis fixation with Syndesmotic screw in neutral position versus maximum ankle dorsiflexion in ankle fracture |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| pain with AOFAS score | The AOFAS ankle-hindfoot score is a clinical rating system associated patients-reported outcomes with clinician-measured outcomes to make a 100-point scale that comprises nine questions in approximately three categories: pain (one question; 40 points), function (seven questions; 50 points) and alignment (one question; 10 points). Through this questionnaire, the condition of the ankle could be described in a more comprehensive and simple way | 1 year |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| mahmoud asaad, resident | Contact | 01114377005 | mahmoudasaad339@gmail.com | |
| Elshazly s Mosa, professor | Contact |
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sohag university Hospital | Recruiting | Sohag | Egypt |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 28865579 | Background | van Zuuren WJ, Schepers T, Beumer A, Sierevelt I, van Noort A, van den Bekerom MPJ. Acute syndesmotic instability in ankle fractures: A review. Foot Ankle Surg. 2017 Sep;23(3):135-141. doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2016.04.001. Epub 2016 Apr 25. | |
| 33333279 | Background | Cornu O, Manon J, Tribak K, Putineanu D. Traumatic injuries of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2021 Feb;107(1S):102778. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2020.102778. Epub 2020 Dec 14. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Date | Date Unknown |
|---|---|---|
| Release | Jan 19, 2025 | |
| Reset | Feb 11, 2025 |
Not provided
Not provided
| Release Date | Unrelease Date | Unrelease Date Unknown | Reset Date | MCP Release Number |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 19, 2025 | Feb 11, 2025 |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D016512 | Ankle Injuries |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D007869 | Leg Injuries |
| D014947 | Wounds and Injuries |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| 34267932 | Background | Corte-Real N, Caetano J. Ankle and syndesmosis instability: consensus and controversies. EFORT Open Rev. 2021 Jun 28;6(6):420-431. doi: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.210017. eCollection 2021 Jun. |
| 7951968 | Background | Kitaoka HB, Alexander IJ, Adelaar RS, Nunley JA, Myerson MS, Sanders M. Clinical rating systems for the ankle-hindfoot, midfoot, hallux, and lesser toes. Foot Ankle Int. 1994 Jul;15(7):349-53. doi: 10.1177/107110079401500701. |