Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The objective of this randomized monocentric study is to assess potential variations in the incidence and severity of isthmocele morbidity among women undergoing cesarean section with either single or double-layer closure of the hysterotomy. Our primary outcome aims to investigate whether there is a reduction in the median duration of intermenstrual spotting in patients belonging to the two respective closure groups
Cesarean section, the most widely performed surgical procedure globally, has seen a significant increase in rates over the past decades, rising from 12.1% in 2000 to 21% in 2015 for various reasons. A recognized complication of cesarean sections is the formation of a uterine niche, commonly referred to as isthmocele. However, the true incidence of this post-operative complication remains uncertain, with reported figures ranging widely from 7% to 80%. The considerable variability in these estimates is attributed in part to the varying sensitivity of diagnostic tools. Moreover, there is a lack of consensus in the literature regarding the definition of a cesarean niche, particularly concerning the dimensions of the defect.
Recent well-designed randomized controlled trials have investigated the long-term outcomes of single versus double-layer hysterotomy closure during C-sections. These studies found no significant differences in isthmocele incidence or intermenstrual spotting. However, limitations such as the lack of correlation between symptom severity and uterine defect dimensions, the inclusion of women in labor, and relatively short follow-up periods are acknowledged weaknesses, prompting the need for further analysis.
Our objective is to compare the outcomes of single versus double-layer hysterotomy closure in terms of intermenstrual spotting and isthmocele incidence in singleton women undergoing elective C-sections. Crucially, standardizing the surgical suturing technique is essential to mitigate potential misleading outcomes resulting from inter-operator variations.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Single-layer | Experimental | Patients who are randomized in this arm undergo a single layer-hysterotomy closure |
|
| Double-layer | Experimental | Patients who are randomized in this arm undergo a double layer-hysterotomy closure |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hysterotomy closure | Procedure | Hysterotomy closure is done in either one of two ways. Single layer closure consists in a single layer, unlocked suture. Double layer closure consists in a double layer, unlocked suture. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Intermenstrual bleeding reduction (days) | The primary outcome of the study is to evaluate weather there is a reduction of intermenstrual bleeding in the six months after cesarean section among the two groups of patients. | 6 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Intra-operatory time | Evaluate evaluate weather there is a difference in operative time among the two groups of patients | 6 months |
| Blood loss | Evaluate any difference in intra-operative blood loss (milliliters of blood) |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Giuseppe Perugino, MD | Contact | 3383030553 | +39 | giuseppe.perugino@policlinico.mi.it |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Giuseppe Perugino, MD | Ospedale Policlinico Maggiore Ca' Granda Milano | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fondazione CÃ Granda IRCCS Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico di Milano | Recruiting | Milan | Mi | 20122 | Italy |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 25136167 | Background | Hegde CV. The never ending debate single-layer versus double-layer closure of the uterine incision at cesarean section. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2014 Aug;64(4):239-40. doi: 10.1007/s13224-014-0573-9. Epub 2014 Jul 23. No abstract available. | |
| 34729282 | Result | Qayum K, Kar I, Sofi J, Panneerselvam H. Single- Versus Double-Layer Uterine Closure After Cesarean Section Delivery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cureus. 2021 Sep 30;13(9):e18405. doi: 10.7759/cureus.18405. eCollection 2021 Sep. |
Not provided
Not provided
Data obtained through this study may be provided to qualified researchers with academic interest in cesarean section outcomes. Data or samples shared will be coded, with no PHI included. Approval of the request and execution of all applicable agreements (i.e. a material transfer agreement) are prerequisites to the sharing of data with the requesting party
Data will be available by may 2025
Data will be shared upon reasonable request
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Patients are recruited and randomly assigned to either the "single-layer" or "double-layer" arm of the study. The randomization process occurs on the day of the cesarean section. Following randomization, patients are informed about their assigned group, and the cesarean section procedure is then carried out.
Not provided
| 6 months |
| Analgesics | Evaluate any difference in post-operative use of analgesics | 6 months |
| Post-operatory recovery time | Evaluate any difference in post-operative recovery time (days) | 6 months |
| Time to full patient mobilization | Evaluate any difference in post-operative time to full mobilization | 6 months |
| Isthmocele | Evaluate any difference in isthmocele incidence between the two groups | 6 months |
| 34955322 | Result | Marchand GJ, Masoud A, King A, Ruther S, Brazil G, Ulibarri H, Parise J, Arroyo A, Coriell C, Goetz S, Christensen A, Sainz K. Effect of single- and double-layer cesarean section closure on residual myometrial thickness and isthmocele - a systematic review and meta-analysis. Turk J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Dec 24;18(4):322-332. doi: 10.4274/tjod.galenos.2021.71173. |
| 38154502 | Result | Verberkt C, Stegwee SI, Van der Voet LF, Van Baal WM, Kapiteijn K, Geomini PMAJ, Van Eekelen R, de Groot CJM, de Leeuw RA, Huirne JAF; 2Close study group. Single-layer vs double-layer uterine closure during cesarean delivery: 3-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial (2Close study). Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Sep;231(3):346.e1-346.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2023.12.032. Epub 2023 Dec 26. |
| 34738347 | Result | Budny-Winska J, Zimmer-Stelmach A, Pomorski M. Impact of selected risk factors on uterine healing after cesarean section in women with single-layer uterine closure: A prospective study using two- and three-dimensional transvaginal ultrasonography. Adv Clin Exp Med. 2022 Jan;31(1):41-48. doi: 10.17219/acem/142519. |
| 28070914 | Result | Di Spiezio Sardo A, Saccone G, McCurdy R, Bujold E, Bifulco G, Berghella V. Risk of Cesarean scar defect following single- vs double-layer uterine closure: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Nov;50(5):578-583. doi: 10.1002/uog.17401. Epub 2017 Oct 9. |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D014592 | Uterine Hemorrhage |
| D002921 | Cicatrix |
| C562565 | Uterine Anomalies |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D014591 | Uterine Diseases |
| D005831 | Genital Diseases, Female |
| D052776 | Female Urogenital Diseases |
| D005261 | Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications |
| D000091642 | Urogenital Diseases |
| D000091662 | Genital Diseases |
| D006470 | Hemorrhage |
| D010335 | Pathologic Processes |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
| D005355 | Fibrosis |
Not provided
Not provided