Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Foundation of Hope, North Carolina | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The goal of this clinical trial is to test how well psilocybin-assisted therapy works in treating people with depression. The main questions this study aims to answer are:
Participants will:
Researchers will also compare whether one treatment or two treatments help improve symptoms more for participants.
Major depressive disorder (MDD) ranks fourth in global disease burden and has significant morbidity, mortality, societal and financial costs. However, few adequate and effective treatments exist with 60% of MDD patients not responding sufficiently to an initial oral antidepressant treatment. These patients who experience treatment resistant depression (TRD), defined as an intolerance or lack of response to two antidepressants of different classes, have limited treatment options beyond the antidepressant treatments that often yield insufficient results or relapse. Psilocybin, a novel treatment, has been found to relieve symptoms of TRD, but there are limited studies on specific dosing and long term treatment follow-up. In this study, the investigators will look closer at the effectiveness of one treatment with psilocybin versus two treatments with psilocybin, as well as the long term effectiveness over the first 12 months after treatment.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Single Psilocybin Treatment | Experimental | Participants will be administered one dose of a 25mg capsule of psilocybin. This will be administered one time. |
|
| Two Psilocybin Treatments | Active Comparator | Participants will be administered one dose of a 25mg capsule of psilocybin. Two weeks later, the participant will be administered one more dose of a 25mg capsule of psilocybin. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| psilocybin | Drug | 25mg of psilocybin administered during treatment session, accompanied by preparation before, integration after, and assistive therapy during the session. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in HAM-D-17 Scores between Baseline and 2 Weeks after Treatment | The change in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 17 item (HAM-D-17) scores between baseline and 2 weeks after treatment The HAM-D-17 is a 17-item questionnaire used to measure severity of depression. The score ranges from 0 to 52. Higher scores indicate more severe depression. | Baseline, 2 weeks |
| Change in QIDS SR-16 Scores between Baseline and 2 Weeks after Treatment | The change between depression scores as reported by Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Short Response-16 (QIDS SR-16) scores between baseline and 2 weeks after treatment The QIDS SR-16 is a 16-item questionnaire used to measure severity of depression. The scores range from 0 to 45. Higher scores indicate more severe depression. | Baseline, 2 weeks |
| Number of Participants Achieving Remission 2 Weeks after Treatment | Number of participants achieving remission (defined as a HAM-D-17 score less than 10) 2 weeks after treatment | up to 2 weeks |
| Number of Participants Achieving Response 2 weeks after treatment | Number of participants achieving response (defined as a HAM-D-17 score that has decreased by greater than or equal to 50 percent compared to baseline) 2 weeks after treatment | up to 2 weeks |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants Achieving Remission at 6 Weeks | Number of participants achieving remission (defined as a HAM-D-17 score less than 10) 6 weeks after treatment | up to 6 weeks |
| Number of Participants Achieving Response at 6 Weeks |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Robert K McClure, MD | Director of Interventional Psychiatry | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UNC Chapel Hill Medical Center | Chapel Hill | North Carolina | 27514 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 29961822 | Background | Demyttenaere K, Van Duppen Z. The Impact of (the Concept of) Treatment-Resistant Depression: An Opinion Review. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2019 Feb 1;22(2):85-92. doi: 10.1093/ijnp/pyy052. | |
| 27848269 | Background | Dold M, Kasper S. Evidence-based pharmacotherapy of treatment-resistant unipolar depression. Int J Psychiatry Clin Pract. 2017 Mar;21(1):13-23. doi: 10.1080/13651501.2016.1248852. Epub 2016 Nov 16. |
Not provided
Not provided
Deidentified individual data that supports the results will be shared beginning 9 to 36 months following publication provided the investigator who proposes to use the data has approval from an Institutional Review Board (IRB), Independent Ethics Committee (IEC), or Research Ethics Board (REB), as applicable, and executes a data use/sharing agreement with UNC.
Data will be provided beginning 9 and continuing for 36 months following publication.
Investigator has approved IRB, IEC, or REB and an executed data use/sharing agreement with UNC.
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D061218 | Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant |
| D003863 | Depression |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003866 | Depressive Disorder |
| D019964 | Mood Disorders |
| D001523 | Mental Disorders |
| D001526 | Behavioral Symptoms |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D011562 | Psilocybin |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D026121 | Indole Alkaloids |
| D000470 | Alkaloids |
| D006571 | Heterocyclic Compounds |
| D007211 | Indoles |
Not provided
Not provided
Participants are randomized into one of two groups and will receive either one single treatment of psilocybin-assisted therapy with follow-up therapy and assessments or two treatments spaced two weeks apart with follow-up therapy and assessments.
Not provided
Not provided
Due to the nature of the study and limitations of study staffing, only those conducting assessments and ratings throughout the study will be masked to the treatments. All others, including participants, therapists, investigators, and study coordinator, will not be masked to the number of treatments a participant receives.
Estimate the number of participants achieving response (defined as a HAM-D-17 score that has decreased by greater than or equal to 50 percent compared to baseline) at 6 weeks after treatment
| up to 6 weeks |
| Number of Participants Achieving Remission at 3 Months | Number of participants achieving remission (defined as a HAM-D-17 score less than 10) 3 months after treatment | up to 3 months |
| Number of Participants Achieving Response at 3 Months | Estimate the number of participants achieving response (defined as a HAM-D-17 score that has decreased by greater than or equal to 50 percent compared to baseline) at 3 months after treatment | up to 3 months |
| Number of Participants Achieving Remission at 6 Months | Number of participants achieving remission (defined as a HAM-D-17 score less than 10) 6 months after treatment | up to 6 months |
| Number of Participants Achieving Response at 6 Months | Estimate the number of participants achieving response (defined as a HAM-D-17 score that has decreased by greater than or equal to 50 percent compared to baseline) at 6 months after treatment | up to 6 months |
| Number of Participants Achieving Remission at 9 Months | Number of participants achieving remission (defined as a HAM-D-17 score less than 10) 9 months after treatment | up to 9 months |
| Number of Participants Achieving Response at 9 Months | Estimate the number of participants achieving response (defined as a HAM-D-17 score that has decreased by greater than or equal to 50 percent compared to baseline) at 9 months after treatment | up to 9 months |
| Number of Participants Achieving Remission at 12 Months | Number of participants achieving remission (defined as a HAM-D-17 score less than 10) 12 months after treatment | up to 12 months |
| Number of Participants Achieving Response at 12 Months | Estimate the number of participants achieving response (defined as a HAM-D-17 score that has decreased by greater than or equal to 50 percent compared to baseline) at 12 months after treatment | up to 12 months |
| Time to Relapse in Participants Who Showed Remission at 2 weeks | Of the number of participants achieving remission (defined as a HAM-D-17 score less than 10) 2 weeks after treatment, the amount of time until a relapse occurring thereafter occurs. Relapse is defined as a HAM-D-17 score greater than or equal to 17 and will be measured up to the study follow-up visit at 1 year. | up to 1 year after treatment |
| Time to Relapse in Participants Who Showed Response at 2 Weeks | Of the number of participants achieving remission (defined as a HAM-D-17 score that has decreased by greater than or equal to 50 percent compared to baseline) 2 weeks after treatment, the amount of time until a relapse occurring thereafter occurs. Relapse is defined as a HAM-D-17 score greater than or equal to 17 and will be measured up to the study follow-up visit at 1 year. | up to 1 year after treatment |
| Change in HAM-D-17 Scores between Baseline and 6 Weeks after Treatment | The change in HAM-D-17 scores between baseline and 2 weeks after treatment The HAM-D-17 is a 17-item questionnaire used to measure severity of depression. The score ranges from 0 to 52. Higher scores indicate more severe depression. | Baseline, 6 weeks |
| Change in HAM-D-17 Scores between Baseline and 3 Months after Treatment | The change in HAM-D-17 scores between baseline and 2 weeks after treatment The HAM-D-17 is a 17-item questionnaire used to measure severity of depression. The score ranges from 0 to 52. Higher scores indicate more severe depression. | Baseline, 3 Months |
| Change in HAM-D-17 Scores between Baseline and 6 Months after Treatment | The change in HAM-D-17 scores between baseline and 2 weeks after treatment The HAM-D-17 is a 17-item questionnaire used to measure severity of depression. The score ranges from 0 to 52. Higher scores indicate more severe depression. | Baseline, 6 Months |
| Change in HAM-D-17 Scores between Baseline and 9 Months after Treatment | The change in HAM-D-17 scores between baseline and 2 weeks after treatment The HAM-D-17 is a 17-item questionnaire used to measure severity of depression. The score ranges from 0 to 52. Higher scores indicate more severe depression. | Baseline, 9 Months |
| Change in HAM-D-17 Scores between Baseline and 12 Months after Treatment | The change in HAM-D-17 scores between baseline and 2 weeks after treatment The HAM-D-17 is a 17-item questionnaire used to measure severity of depression. The score ranges from 0 to 52. Higher scores indicate more severe depression. | Baseline, 12 months |
| Change in QIDS SR-16 Scores between Baseline and 6 Weeks after Treatment | The change between depression scores as reported by QIDS SR-16 scores between baseline and 2 weeks after treatment The QIDS SR-16 is a 16-item questionnaire used to measure severity of depression. The scores range from 0 to 45. Higher scores indicate more severe depression. | Baseline, 6 weeks |
| Change in QIDS SR-16 Scores between Baseline and 3 Months after Treatment | The change between depression scores as reported by QIDS SR-16 scores between baseline and 2 weeks after treatment The QIDS SR-16 is a 16-item questionnaire used to measure severity of depression. The scores range from 0 to 45. Higher scores indicate more severe depression. | Baseline, 3 Months |
| Change in QIDS SR-16 Scores between Baseline and 6 Months after Treatment | The change between depression scores as reported by QIDS SR-16 scores between baseline and 2 weeks after treatment The QIDS SR-16 is a 16-item questionnaire used to measure severity of depression. The scores range from 0 to 45. Higher scores indicate more severe depression. | Baseline, 6 Months |
| Change in QIDS SR-16 Scores between Baseline and 9 Months after Treatment | The change between depression scores as reported by QIDS SR-16 scores between baseline and 2 weeks after treatment The QIDS SR-16 is a 16-item questionnaire used to measure severity of depression. The scores range from 0 to 45. Higher scores indicate more severe depression. | Baseline, 9 Months |
| Change in QIDS SR-16 Scores between Baseline and 12 Months after Treatment | The change between depression scores as reported by QIDS SR-16 scores between baseline and 2 weeks after treatment The QIDS SR-16 is a 16-item questionnaire used to measure severity of depression. The scores range from 0 to 45. Higher scores indicate more severe depression. | Baseline, 12 Months |
| 27909164 | Background | Ross S, Bossis A, Guss J, Agin-Liebes G, Malone T, Cohen B, Mennenga SE, Belser A, Kalliontzi K, Babb J, Su Z, Corby P, Schmidt BL. Rapid and sustained symptom reduction following psilocybin treatment for anxiety and depression in patients with life-threatening cancer: a randomized controlled trial. J Psychopharmacol. 2016 Dec;30(12):1165-1180. doi: 10.1177/0269881116675512. |
| 17074942 | Background | Rush AJ, Trivedi MH, Wisniewski SR, Nierenberg AA, Stewart JW, Warden D, Niederehe G, Thase ME, Lavori PW, Lebowitz BD, McGrath PJ, Rosenbaum JF, Sackeim HA, Kupfer DJ, Luther J, Fava M. Acute and longer-term outcomes in depressed outpatients requiring one or several treatment steps: a STAR*D report. Am J Psychiatry. 2006 Nov;163(11):1905-17. doi: 10.1176/ajp.2006.163.11.1905. |
| 7103679 | Background | Keller MB, Shapiro RW, Lavori PW, Wolfe N. Recovery in major depressive disorder: analysis with the life table and regression models. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1982 Aug;39(8):905-10. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1982.04290080025004. |
| 27909165 | Background | Griffiths RR, Johnson MW, Carducci MA, Umbricht A, Richards WA, Richards BD, Cosimano MP, Klinedinst MA. Psilocybin produces substantial and sustained decreases in depression and anxiety in patients with life-threatening cancer: A randomized double-blind trial. J Psychopharmacol. 2016 Dec;30(12):1181-1197. doi: 10.1177/0269881116675513. |
| 33852780 | Background | Carhart-Harris R, Giribaldi B, Watts R, Baker-Jones M, Murphy-Beiner A, Murphy R, Martell J, Blemings A, Erritzoe D, Nutt DJ. Trial of Psilocybin versus Escitalopram for Depression. N Engl J Med. 2021 Apr 15;384(15):1402-1411. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2032994. |
| 27210031 | Background | Carhart-Harris RL, Bolstridge M, Rucker J, Day CM, Erritzoe D, Kaelen M, Bloomfield M, Rickard JA, Forbes B, Feilding A, Taylor D, Pilling S, Curran VH, Nutt DJ. Psilocybin with psychological support for treatment-resistant depression: an open-label feasibility study. Lancet Psychiatry. 2016 Jul;3(7):619-27. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(16)30065-7. Epub 2016 May 17. |
| 29119217 | Background | Carhart-Harris RL, Bolstridge M, Day CMJ, Rucker J, Watts R, Erritzoe DE, Kaelen M, Giribaldi B, Bloomfield M, Pilling S, Rickard JA, Forbes B, Feilding A, Taylor D, Curran HV, Nutt DJ. Psilocybin with psychological support for treatment-resistant depression: six-month follow-up. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2018 Feb;235(2):399-408. doi: 10.1007/s00213-017-4771-x. Epub 2017 Nov 8. |
| 33146667 | Background | Davis AK, Barrett FS, May DG, Cosimano MP, Sepeda ND, Johnson MW, Finan PH, Griffiths RR. Effects of Psilocybin-Assisted Therapy on Major Depressive Disorder: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Psychiatry. 2021 May 1;78(5):481-489. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2020.3285. |
| 35166158 | Background | Gukasyan N, Davis AK, Barrett FS, Cosimano MP, Sepeda ND, Johnson MW, Griffiths RR. Efficacy and safety of psilocybin-assisted treatment for major depressive disorder: Prospective 12-month follow-up. J Psychopharmacol. 2022 Feb;36(2):151-158. doi: 10.1177/02698811211073759. |
| 26442957 | Background | Barrett FS, Johnson MW, Griffiths RR. Validation of the revised Mystical Experience Questionnaire in experimental sessions with psilocybin. J Psychopharmacol. 2015 Nov;29(11):1182-90. doi: 10.1177/0269881115609019. Epub 2015 Oct 6. |
| 23316089 | Background | Maclean KA, Leoutsakos JM, Johnson MW, Griffiths RR. Factor Analysis of the Mystical Experience Questionnaire: A Study of Experiences Occasioned by the Hallucinogen Psilocybin. J Sci Study Relig. 2012 Dec;51(4):721-737. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5906.2012.01685.x. |
| 35431912 | Background | Murphy R, Kettner H, Zeifman R, Giribaldi B, Kartner L, Martell J, Read T, Murphy-Beiner A, Baker-Jones M, Nutt D, Erritzoe D, Watts R, Carhart-Harris R. Therapeutic Alliance and Rapport Modulate Responses to Psilocybin Assisted Therapy for Depression. Front Pharmacol. 2022 Mar 31;12:788155. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.788155. eCollection 2021. |
| 22035996 | Background | Bond FW, Hayes SC, Baer RA, Carpenter KM, Guenole N, Orcutt HK, Waltz T, Zettle RD. Preliminary psychometric properties of the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II: a revised measure of psychological inflexibility and experiential avoidance. Behav Ther. 2011 Dec;42(4):676-88. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2011.03.007. Epub 2011 May 25. |
| D001519 |
| Behavior |
| D006574 |
| Heterocyclic Compounds, 2-Ring |
| D000072471 | Heterocyclic Compounds, Fused-Ring |
| D014363 | Tryptamines |
| D054836 | Indolizidines |
| D007212 | Indolizines |