Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, China | UNKNOWN |
| China Medical University Hospital | OTHER |
| Center of Postgraduate Medical Education, Poland | UNKNOWN |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study is an international multicentre RCT to compare the linically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) detection of cognitive-guided and MRI-USG guided biopsies in men with suspicious MRI lesion.
This study is an international multicentre RCT to compare the csPCa detection of cognitive-guided and MRI-USG guided biopsies in men with suspicious MRI lesion. This is a phase III randomised controlled trial to evaluate the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) by MRI-USG fusion approach (MRUS arm) versus Cognitive-guided approach (COG arm). The study hypothesis is that MRUS arm is superior to COG arm in detecting csPCa. The result of this RCT would impact how MRI-guided prostate biopsies should be done in the future. If the MRI-USG fusion approach is superior to cognitive-guidance in csPCa detection, it should be the standard of practice in the future, and dedicated MRI-USG fusion equipment should be available in centres performing prostate biopsies.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| MRUS arm | Experimental | Targeted biopsies will be performed by software-assisted MRI-ultrasound fusion registration . Software-based fusion targeted biopsy of 4 cores per target followed by 12-core systematic biopsy will be performed. The fusion or overlay of 3D MRI and USG images create a detailed 3D prostate image with both targeted and systematic biopsy core locations recorded. |
|
| COG arm | Active Comparator | The biopsy operator reviews the MR images and creates a mental three-dimensional representation of the prostate and the lesion within it to guide biopsy. Cognitive registration is a visual guidance technique in which the surgeon samples a visually estimated location on transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) corresponding to the MRI suspicious regions. Cognitive-guided biopsy is performed by taking 4 cores from each target followed by 12-core systematic biopsies. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MRI-USG fusion approach | Procedure | MRI-USG fusion approach prostate biopsy |
| |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Proportion of men with clinically significant Prostate cancer(csPCa) | ISUP Grade 2 or above prostate cancer diagnosed on biopsy | When histology results available, at an expected average of 30 days post-biopsy |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Proportion of men with a diagnosis of csPCa in MRI lesions with maximal size ≤10mm versus >10mm | MRI lesions with maximal size ≤10mm versus >10mm | When histology results available, at an expected average of 30 days post-biopsy |
| Proportion of men with a diagnosis of csPCa in prostate size of ≤50ml vs >50m |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Male
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peter Ka-Fungq CHIU, PhD | Contact | 35052625 | peterchiu@surgery.cuhk.edu.hk |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Peter Ka-Fungq CHIU | Chinese University of Hong Kong | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prince of Wales Hospital | Recruiting | Hong Kong | Hong Kong |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 33538338 | Background | Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, Bray F. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. Epub 2021 Feb 4. | |
| 27932742 | Background | Chan SY, Ng CF, Lee KW, Yee CH, Chiu PK, Teoh JY, Hou SS. Differences in cancer characteristics of Chinese patients with prostate cancer who present with different symptoms. Hong Kong Med J. 2017 Feb;23(1):6-12. doi: 10.12809/hkmj164875. Epub 2016 Dec 9. |
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| Hong Kong Cancer Statistics | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D011471 | Prostatic Neoplasms |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D005834 | Genital Neoplasms, Male |
| D014565 | Urogenital Neoplasms |
| D009371 | Neoplasms by Site |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
Not provided
Not provided
| Kaohsiung Medical University |
| OTHER |
| Tuen Mun Hospital Hong Kong | UNKNOWN |
| Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong | OTHER |
| Stanford Cancer Institute | UNKNOWN |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Cognitive-guided approach |
| Procedure |
Cognitive-guided approach prostate biopsy |
|
prostate size of ≤50ml vs >50ml |
| When histology results available, at an expected average of 30 days post-biopsy |
| The proportion of men with a diagnosis of csPCa only in targeted biopsy | ISUP Grade 2 or above prostate cancer diagnosed on biopsy | When histology results available, at an expected average of 30 days post-biopsy |
| Proportion of men with a diagnosis of csPCa only in systemic biopsy | ISUP Grade 2 or above prostate cancer diagnosed on biopsy | When histology results available, at an expected average of 30 days post-biopsy |
| Proportion of men with a diagnosis of clinically insignificant PCa, | ISUP grade group 1 Prostate cancer diagnosed on biopsy | When histology results available, at an expected average of 30 days post-biopsy |
| Procedure time | Total time of procedure | During biopsy procedure |
| Pain score on a scale of 0-10 taken after biopsy | The higher the score, the more pain | Immediately After biopsy procedure |
| Proportion of men with post-biopsy adverse events within 30 days after biopsy | The severity of Adverse event is grade by Clavien-Dindo classification | 30 days post biopsy |
| 30178778 | Background | Wong HF, Yee CH, Teoh JY, Chan SY, Chiu PK, Cheung HY, Hou SS, Ng CF. Time trend and characteristics of prostate cancer diagnosed in Hong Kong (China) in the past two decades. Asian J Androl. 2019 Jan 1;21(1):104-106. doi: 10.4103/aja.aja_75_18. No abstract available. |
| 31843337 | Background | Patasius A, Smailyte G. Re: MaryBeth B. Culp, Isabelle Soerjomataram, Jason A. Efstathiou, Freddie Bray, Ahmedin Jemal. Recent Global Patterns in Prostate Cancer Incidence and Mortality Rates. Eur Urol 2020;77:38-52. Eur Urol. 2020 May;77(5):e132. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.11.030. Epub 2019 Dec 13. No abstract available. |
| 32130814 | Background | Ahdoot M, Wilbur AR, Reese SE, Lebastchi AH, Mehralivand S, Gomella PT, Bloom J, Gurram S, Siddiqui M, Pinsky P, Parnes H, Linehan WM, Merino M, Choyke PL, Shih JH, Turkbey B, Wood BJ, Pinto PA. MRI-Targeted, Systematic, and Combined Biopsy for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis. N Engl J Med. 2020 Mar 5;382(10):917-928. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1910038. |
| 28498624 | Background | Chiu PK, Alberts AR, Venderbos LDF, Bangma CH, Roobol MJ. Additional benefit of using a risk-based selection for prostate biopsy: an analysis of biopsy complications in the Rotterdam section of the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer. BJU Int. 2017 Sep;120(3):394-400. doi: 10.1111/bju.13913. Epub 2017 Jun 5. |
| 30616947 | Background | Heidegger I, Pichler R. Re: Peter K.-F. Chiu, Chi-Fai Ng, Axel Semjonow, et al. A Multicentre Evaluation of the Role of the Prostate Health Index (PHI) in Regions with Differing Prevalence of Prostate Cancer: Adjustment of PHI Reference Ranges is Needed for European and Asian Settings. Eur Urol 2019;75:558-61. Eur Urol. 2019 Jun;75(6):e158-e159. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.12.041. Epub 2019 Jan 5. No abstract available. |
| 27897172 | Background | Chiu PK, Roobol MJ, Nieboer D, Teoh JY, Yuen SK, Hou SM, Yiu MK, Ng CF. Adaptation and external validation of the European randomised study of screening for prostate cancer risk calculator for the Chinese population. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2017 Mar;20(1):99-104. doi: 10.1038/pcan.2016.57. Epub 2016 Nov 29. |
| 30898406 | Background | Turkbey B, Rosenkrantz AB, Haider MA, Padhani AR, Villeirs G, Macura KJ, Tempany CM, Choyke PL, Cornud F, Margolis DJ, Thoeny HC, Verma S, Barentsz J, Weinreb JC. Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2.1: 2019 Update of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2. Eur Urol. 2019 Sep;76(3):340-351. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.02.033. Epub 2019 Mar 18. |
| 30082150 | Background | Alberts AR, Roobol MJ, Verbeek JFM, Schoots IG, Chiu PK, Osses DF, Tijsterman JD, Beerlage HP, Mannaerts CK, Schimmoller L, Albers P, Arsov C. Prediction of High-grade Prostate Cancer Following Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Improving the Rotterdam European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer Risk Calculators. Eur Urol. 2019 Feb;75(2):310-318. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.07.031. Epub 2018 Aug 3. |
| 31022301 | Background | Drost FH, Osses DF, Nieboer D, Steyerberg EW, Bangma CH, Roobol MJ, Schoots IG. Prostate MRI, with or without MRI-targeted biopsy, and systematic biopsy for detecting prostate cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Apr 25;4(4):CD012663. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012663.pub2. |
| 28110982 | Background | Ahmed HU, El-Shater Bosaily A, Brown LC, Gabe R, Kaplan R, Parmar MK, Collaco-Moraes Y, Ward K, Hindley RG, Freeman A, Kirkham AP, Oldroyd R, Parker C, Emberton M; PROMIS study group. Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS): a paired validating confirmatory study. Lancet. 2017 Feb 25;389(10071):815-822. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32401-1. Epub 2017 Jan 20. |
| 29552975 | Background | Kasivisvanathan V, Rannikko AS, Borghi M, Panebianco V, Mynderse LA, Vaarala MH, Briganti A, Budaus L, Hellawell G, Hindley RG, Roobol MJ, Eggener S, Ghei M, Villers A, Bladou F, Villeirs GM, Virdi J, Boxler S, Robert G, Singh PB, Venderink W, Hadaschik BA, Ruffion A, Hu JC, Margolis D, Crouzet S, Klotz L, Taneja SS, Pinto P, Gill I, Allen C, Giganti F, Freeman A, Morris S, Punwani S, Williams NR, Brew-Graves C, Deeks J, Takwoingi Y, Emberton M, Moore CM; PRECISION Study Group Collaborators. MRI-Targeted or Standard Biopsy for Prostate-Cancer Diagnosis. N Engl J Med. 2018 May 10;378(19):1767-1777. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1801993. Epub 2018 Mar 18. |
| 36653670 | Background | Connor MJ, Gorin MA, Eldred-Evans D, Bass EJ, Desai A, Dudderidge T, Winkler M, Ahmed HU. Landmarks in the evolution of prostate biopsy. Nat Rev Urol. 2023 Apr;20(4):241-258. doi: 10.1038/s41585-022-00684-0. Epub 2023 Jan 18. |
| 27349564 | Background | Chiu PK, Roobol MJ, Teoh JY, Lee WM, Yip SY, Hou SM, Bangma CH, Ng CF. Prostate health index (PHI) and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) predictive models for prostate cancer in the Chinese population and the role of digital rectal examination-estimated prostate volume. Int Urol Nephrol. 2016 Oct;48(10):1631-7. doi: 10.1007/s11255-016-1350-8. Epub 2016 Jun 27. |
| 5201460 | Background | Gigot O. [Treatment of alcoholic intoxication (exclusive of acute attacks)]. Infirm Fr. 1970 Jun;116:31 passimc. No abstract available. French. |
| D005832 |
| Genital Diseases, Male |
| D000091662 | Genital Diseases |
| D000091642 | Urogenital Diseases |
| D011469 | Prostatic Diseases |
| D052801 | Male Urogenital Diseases |