Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Canadian IBD Research Consortium (CIRC) | UNKNOWN |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this study is to compare how effective and how tolerable two different bowel preparation laxatives are for colonoscopy. The aim is to compare oral sulfate solution (OSS) to another laxative called 2L polyethylene glycol (PEG) solution to see which is more effective and more tolerable by individuals with IBD (Crohn's disease or Ulcerative colitis).
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| OSS | Active Comparator |
| |
| 2L PEG | Active Comparator |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KleanLyte | Drug | Laxative for colonoscopy bowel preparation |
| |
| Bi-PegLyte |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Quality of bowel cleanliness | The primary outcome will be adequate quality of bowel cleanliness. Proportion with adequate cleansing will be measured by Boston Bowel Preparation Scale Score ≥2 in all segments. | 1 year |
| Quality of bowel cleanliness | The primary outcome will be adequate quality of bowel cleanliness. Proportion with adequate cleansing will be measured by the Ottawa scale score as a binary adequate/inadequate score (≤7) will be recorded. | 1 year |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Volume of laxative intake | Will compare completion of laxative intake. | 1 year |
| Endoscopic Outcomes | Will compare dysplasia detection rate. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jane Castelli | Contact | 289-880-3609 | jcast@mcmaster.ca |
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University of Manitoba | Recruiting | Winnipeg | Manitoba | H2X 1R9 | Canada |
No individual participant data will be shared.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003424 | Crohn Disease |
| D003093 | Colitis, Ulcerative |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D015212 | Inflammatory Bowel Diseases |
| D005759 | Gastroenteritis |
| D005767 | Gastrointestinal Diseases |
| D004066 | Digestive System Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Drug |
Laxative for colonoscopy bowel preparation |
|
| 1 year |
| Endoscopic Outcomes | Will compare withdrawal time. | 1 year |
| Endoscopic Outcomes | Will compare total procedure time. | 1 year |
| Endoscopic Outcomes | Will compare cecal intubation rate | 1 year |
| Patient experience data | Will determine the proportion of patients in each group reporting: use of split dose and day before bowel preparation (even though they were prescribed split-dose) , incontinence episodes during bowel preparation and during travel to the colonoscopy appointment; total duration of sleep; number of nocturnal awakenings: patient willingness to repeat colonoscopy using the same preparation; pre-colonoscopy anxiety rating; difficulty with bowel preparation rating. The study specific patient questionnaire will be administered prior to the colonoscopy to avoid any contamination by the experience of the colonoscopy. | 1 year |
| Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis flares after colonoscopy | A one month phone call to determine diagnosed flares within a month | One month |
| Endoscopic Outcomes | Will also compare the proportion of patients requiring repeat colonoscopy because of an inadequate bowel preparation. Will collect data on mucosal abnormality suspected by endoscopist to be due to bowel preparation. | 1 year |
| D007410 | Intestinal Diseases |
| D003092 | Colitis |
| D003108 | Colonic Diseases |