Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
At a postural level, many doctors, physiotherapists and chiropractors are convinced that lower back pain induced by heels is due to an increase in lumbar lordosis associated with an anterior pelvic tilt; this thought is even shared by the American Chiropractic Association and the American Physical Therapy Association.
Furthermore, in most of the websites consulted, even by non-experts, the reason for the onset of spinal pain is attributed to hyperlordosis and pelvic anteversion. However, this thought is not entirely in agreement with other scientific publications. Therefore it is necessary to pay attention to online searches which often answer these questions without taking EBM into account.
None of the studies reported above take into consideration the time factor. In fact, all the studies have evaluated the immediate changes brought about by heel raising. Women who complain of lower back pain when wearing high-heeled shoes rarely experience pain as soon as they start wearing them.
The objective of the research arises from these considerations. The aim of this study (primary outcome) is to investigate whether wearing high-heeled shoes for at least 2 hours modifies the spinopelvic parameters compared to the barefoot condition and as soon as the shoes are worn.
The secondary outcome will be to verify in the sample analyzed whether there are different behaviors between the subgroups of those who have complained in their anamnesis and those who have never complained of lower back pain when using high-heeled shoes for a few hours.
A three-dimensional analysis of the posterior surface will be performed with the Formetric 4D® rasterstereographic device (Diers International GmbH, Schlangenbad, Germany).
Participants will be given a questionnaire which investigates:
This last data will be filled in at the end of the evaluation.
For the evaluation of the secondary outcome, on the basis of the data from the medical history sheet, the sample will be divided into two groups:
The subjects will be asked to bring their own pair of shoes with a heel that is at least 8.7 cm, the average height reported by the work of Schroeder and Hollander, where average height means the difference between the height of the heel and the height of the raised part at the forefoot level (plateau). A particular heel width will not be required, because it seems that the height of the heel influences muscle activation, in particular the paravertebral muscles, while the width of the heel has no significant effects on them.
Conversely, amplitude has a greater influence on balance when standing and while walking.
Three evaluation will be performed:
Statistic analysis
A descriptive analysis of the population will be performed to determine the mean values and standard deviations (SD) of both the combined group and the subgroups A and S. T-tests for independent data will be used to verify whether there are any significant differences between the two subgroups .
The distribution of the data will be verified using graphical representation. If the distribution is normal (p <0.05) for the comparison between T1 vs T2 the t-test for paired data will be used and between the subgroups (T1S vs T1A and T2S vs T2A) t-test for independent data with statistical significance accepted for p values <0.05. ANOVA will be used to simultaneously compare the pre and post of both groups.
If the data does not have a normal distribution (p >0.05) the Wilcoxon test will be used for the comparison between the T1 vs T2 data of the total group and the Mann-Whitney U test for the comparison between subgroups (T1S vs T1A and T2S vs T2A). The Friedman test will be used to simultaneously compare the pre and post of both groups.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| heel hight shoes | Other | stand upright for 2 hours wearing your own shoes with heels at least 7 cm high |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| effect of high-heeled shoes on trunk inclination | The aim of this study is to investigate whether wearing high-heeled shoes for at least 2 hours modifies the flexion of the antero-posterior trunk (measured as the angle between the vertical and the line that passes through the prominent cervical vertebra and the line that connects the two dimples) compared to the barefoot condition and as soon as the shoes are worn. | 2 hours after wearing high heels |
| effect of high-heeled shoes on pelvic inclination | The aim of this study is to investigate whether wearing high-heeled shoes for at least 2 hours modifies the pelvic inclination angle (the angle between the vertical and the tangent to the lumbosacral junction) compared to the barefoot condition and as soon as the shoes are worn. | 2 hours after wearing high heels |
| effect of high-heeled shoes on lordotic angle | The aim of this study is to investigate whether wearing high-heeled shoes for at least 2 hours modifies the lordotic angle (angle measured between the tangents of the thoracolumbar junction and the lumbosacral junction) compared to the barefoot condition and as soon as the shoes are worn. | 2 hours after wearing high heels |
| effect of high-heeled shoes on kyphotic angle | The aim of this study is to investigate whether wearing high-heeled shoes for at least 2 hours modifies the kyphotic angle (angle measured between the tangents of the cervicothoracic junction and the thoracolumbar junction) compared to the barefoot condition and as soon as the shoes are worn. | 2 hours after wearing high heels |
| effect of high-heeled shoes on lumbar arrow | The aim of this study is to investigate whether wearing high-heeled shoes for at least 2 hours modifies the lumbar arrow (horizontal distance in millimeters of the lumbar spine from the virtual vertical line that passes through the kyphotic apex) compared to the barefoot condition and as soon as the shoes are worn. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| different response on trunk inclination between the subgroups (suffering from back pain and asymptomatic) | The secondary outcome will be to verify in the sample analyzed whether there are different behaviors of the flexion of the antero-posterior trunk (measured as the angle between the vertical and the line that passes through the prominent cervical vertebra and the line that connects the two dimples) between the subgroups of those who suffer from low-back pain and those who have never complained of low-back pain when using high-heeled shoes for a few hours. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Usual female users of shoes with heels at least 7 cm high, with a frequency of at least twice a week and/or less than 3 hours/week
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Saverio Colonna, MD | Contact | +393356213419 | saverio.colonna@libero.it | |
| Corrado Borghi | Contact | 3491073678 | corrado.borghi@gmail.com |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Saverio Colonna, MD | Spine Center | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spine Center | Recruiting | Bologna | 40128 | Italy |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Background | Lee CM, Jeong EH, Freivalds A (2001) Biomechanical effects of wearing high-heeled shoes. Int J Indust Ergonom 28:321-326 | ||
| 22078999 | Background | de Oliveira Pezzan PA, Joao SM, Ribeiro AP, Manfio EF. Postural assessment of lumbar lordosis and pelvic alignment angles in adolescent users and nonusers of high-heeled shoes. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2011 Nov;34(9):614-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2011.09.006. | |
| 25753007 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | Feb 10, 2024 | Feb 10, 2024 | Prot_SAP_000.pdf |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D017116 | Low Back Pain |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001416 | Back Pain |
| D010146 | Pain |
| D009461 | Neurologic Manifestations |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| 2 hours after wearing high heels |
| effect of high-heeled shoes on cervical arrow | The aim of this study is to investigate whether wearing high-heeled shoes for at least 2 hours modifies the cervical arrow (horizontal distance in millimeters of the cervical spine from the virtual vertical line that passes through the kyphotic apex) compared to the barefoot condition and as soon as the shoes are worn. | 2 hours after wearing high heels |
| 2 hours after wearing high heels |
| different response on pelvic inclination between the subgroups (suffering from back pain and asymptomatic) | The secondary outcome will be to verify in the sample analyzed whether there are different behaviors of the pelvic inclination angle (the angle between the vertical and the tangent to the lumbosacral junction) between the subgroups of those who suffer from low-back pain and those who have never complained of low-back pain when using high-heeled shoes for a few hours. | 2 hours after wearing high heels |
| different response on lordotic angle between the subgroups (suffering from back pain and asymptomatic) | The secondary outcome will be to verify in the sample analyzed whether there are different behaviors of the lordotic angle (angle measured between the tangents of the thoracolumbar junction and the lumbosacral junction) between the subgroups of those who suffer from low-back pain and those who have never complained of low-back pain when using high-heeled shoes for a few hours. | 2 hours after wearing high heels |
| different response on kyphotic angle between the subgroups (suffering from back pain and asymptomatic) | The secondary outcome will be to verify in the sample analyzed whether there are different behaviors of the kyphotic angle (angle measured between the tangents of the cervicothoracic junction and the thoracolumbar junction) between the subgroups of those who suffer from low-back pain and those who have never complained of low-back pain when using high-heeled shoes for a few hours. | 2 hours after wearing high heels |
| different response on lumbar arrow between the subgroups (suffering from back pain and asymptomatic) | The secondary outcome will be to verify in the sample analyzed whether there are different behaviors of the lumbar arrow (horizontal distance in millimeters of the lumbar spine from the virtual vertical line that passes through the kyphotic apex) between the subgroups of those who suffer from low-back pain and those who have never complained of low-back pain when using high-heeled shoes for a few hours. | 2 hours after wearing high heels |
| different response on cervical arrow between the subgroups (suffering from back pain and asymptomatic) | The secondary outcome will be to verify in the sample analyzed whether there are different behaviors of the cervical arrow (horizontal distance in millimeters of the cervical spine from the virtual vertical line that passes through the kyphotic apex) between the subgroups of those who suffer from low-back pain and those who have never complained of low-back pain when using high-heeled shoes for a few hours. | 2 hours after wearing high heels |
| Background |
| Dai M, Li X, Zhou X, Hu Y, Luo Q, Zhou S. High-heeled-related alterations in the static sagittal profile of the spino-pelvic structure in young women. Eur Spine J. 2015 Jun;24(6):1274-81. doi: 10.1007/s00586-015-3857-6. Epub 2015 Mar 10. |
| 1910649 | Background | de Lateur BJ, Giaconi RM, Questad K, Ko M, Lehmann JF. Footwear and posture. Compensatory strategies for heel height. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1991 Oct;70(5):246-54. |
| 7711763 | Background | Franklin ME, Chenier TC, Brauninger L, Cook H, Harris S. Effect of positive heel inclination on posture. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1995 Feb;21(2):94-9. doi: 10.2519/jospt.1995.21.2.94. |
| 27190453 | Background | Schroder G, Kundt G, Otte M, Wendig D, Schober HC. Impact of pregnancy on back pain and body posture in women. J Phys Ther Sci. 2016 Apr;28(4):1199-207. doi: 10.1589/jpts.28.1199. Epub 2016 Apr 28. |
| 22742722 | Background | Gerber SB, Costa RV, Grecco LA, Pasini H, Marconi NF, Oliveira CS. Interference of high-heeled shoes in static balance among young women. Hum Mov Sci. 2012 Oct;31(5):1247-52. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2012.02.005. Epub 2012 Jun 27. |
| 25642040 | Background | Han D. Muscle activation of paraspinal muscles in different types of high heels during standing. J Phys Ther Sci. 2015 Jan;27(1):67-9. doi: 10.1589/jpts.27.67. Epub 2015 Jan 9. |
| 22027108 | Background | Russell BS. The effect of high-heeled shoes on lumbar lordosis: a narrative review and discussion of the disconnect between Internet content and peer-reviewed literature. J Chiropr Med. 2010 Dec;9(4):166-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2010.07.003. Epub 2010 Oct 14. |
| 25931709 | Background | Kwon YJ, Song M, Baek IH, Lee T. The effect of simulating a leg-length discrepancy on pelvic position and spinal posture. J Phys Ther Sci. 2015 Mar;27(3):689-91. doi: 10.1589/jpts.27.689. Epub 2015 Mar 31. |
| D013568 |
| Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |