Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Successful osseointegration considered the cornerstone in implant stability which predict the highest implants success outcomes. Implant stability depend on many factors like the implant design, surgical technique, and bone density. Posterior maxilla considered as a challenging area in implant placement, this is due to less dense trabecular bone sur-rounded by a thin layer of cortical bone which result in suffering in implant stability. The aim of this study is to evaluate the bone density outcomes using bone densification technique and piezoelectric surgical technique in sinus lift to promote bone gain
Objectives: This study was directed to compare the outcomes of internal sinus lifting between osseodensification approach and piezoelectric surgery approach on the primary stability and osseointegration of dental implant.
Background data: Successful osseointegration considered the cornerstone in implant sta-bility which predict the highest implants success outcomes. Implant stability depend on many factors like the implant design, surgical technique, and bone density. Posterior maxilla considered as a challenging area in implant placement, this is due to less dense trabecular bone surrounded by a thin layer of cortical bone which result in suffering in implant stability. The aim of this study is to evaluate the bone density outcomes using bone densification technique and piezoelectric surgical technique in sinus lift to promote bone gain.
Materials and Methods: A total of 20 patients were randomly divided into two groups: Group1: patients received dental implant using osseodensification via Densah bur, Group2: patients received dental implant using hydrodynamic piezoelectric sinus lifting. The patients in both groups underwent bone grafting under sinus membrane. Modified bleeding index and probing depth were evaluated at 3, 6 and 12months intervals. An Osstell device was used to determine implant stability by recording the values of implant stability quotient (ISQ) immediately after implant placement and after 3 months. CBCT was performed before, after 6 months and after 12 months to evaluate ridge height, bone density. Marginal bone loss was evaluated after 3 months via periapical radiograph, after 6 , 12 months via CBCT.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Group Densah Bur | Experimental | patients received dental implant using osseodensification via Densah bur |
|
| Group piezoelectric | Experimental | patients received dental implant using hydrodynamic piezoelectric sinus lifting |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| internal sinus lift surgery | Procedure | surgery approach |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Implant stability using the Osstell device by percentage | Primary implant stability (ISQ) | baseline ,3 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Modified sulcus bleeding index,Peri-implant pocket depth (PPD)by mm | Clinical evaluation | 3,6,9 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Bone Densityby mm | Crestal Bone Loss (CBL) | 3,6,12 months |
Inclusion Criteria:
free of systemic disease bone height at the site of the implant is ≤ 6 mm. have good oral hygiene.
-
Exclusion Criteria:
systemic diseases active periodontal disease , limited mouth-opening ability maxillary sinus disease or previous sinus surgery were also excluded smokers pregnant
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Ibrahim Hammad Ibrahim, lecturer | Al-Azhar University | Study Director |
| Khalid s Hassan, Dean of Badr University | Faculty of Dentistry ,Badr university ,Assuit branch ,Egypt | Study Chair |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alazhar university ,Assuit branch ,Egypt | Asyut | Assuit | 0000 | Egypt |
Not provided
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| orchid | View source |
| researchgate | View source |
| web of science |
Not provided
Comparing the Hydrodynamic Piezoelectric Technique with Osseodensification for the Assessment of Internal Sinus Iift-ing: (a Randomized Clinical Trial)
1 month
DOI:10.21203/rs.3.rs-4132878/v1
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001851 | Bone Diseases, Metabolic |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001847 | Bone Diseases |
| D009140 | Musculoskeletal Diseases |
| D008659 | Metabolic Diseases |
| D009750 | Nutritional and Metabolic Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
A total of 20 patients were randomly divided into two groups: Group1: patients received dental implant using osseodensification via Densah bur, Group2: patients received dental implant using hydrodynamic piezoelectric sinus lifting. The patients in both groups underwent bone grafting under sinus membrane. Modified bleeding index and probing depth were evaluated at 3, 6 and 12months intervals. An Osstell device was used to de-termine implant stability by recording the values of implant stability quotient (ISQ) im-mediately after implant placement and after 3 months. CBCT was performed before, af-ter 6 months and after 12 months to evaluate ridge height, bone density. Marginal bone loss was evaluated after 3 months via periapical radiograph, after 6 months and after 12 months via CBCT.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided