Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Pain constitutes the predominant motive prompting individuals to seek emergency medical attention, accounting for 80% of admissions to emergency departments. Presently, it is imperative to employ expeditious and efficacious analgesia-sedation methodologies, obviating the necessity for intravenous administration, while ensuring the secure delivery of pharmaceutical agents. The objective of this study is to assess the feasibility and comfort of nebulized intranasal or facial aerosol administration of Fentanyl through the implementation of a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) study
The prompt identification, assessment, and management of pain are imperative in the context of emergency medicine, necessitating rapid and effective interventions. In the realm of pain management, the investigators deemed it crucial to concentrate on non-invasive approaches, such as opioid nebulization, while ensuring the safe and controlled delivery of the pharmaceutical agent. Intranasal analgesia emerges as a particularly suitable option due to its non-invasiveness, painlessness, ease of administration, cost-effectiveness, and lack of stringent aseptic requirements, making it especially convenient for patients in pain. However, the administration of medications in nasal drop form lacks precise control over the quantity of the active drug, potentially resulting in a hepatic first-pass effect and inactivation before systemic absorption, particularly with large quantities and subsequent swallowing.
Facial nebulization of opiates presents an alternative method for analgesic administration. Traditional pneumatic nebulizers, readily available in emergency settings, are economical aerosol generators. However, they pose challenges related to the reproducibility of administration and the potential for infectious contamination due to the dispersion of nebulized particles in the air between inhalations. Palladium vibrating screen aerosols, designed to produce optimal particle sizes for drug delivery to the lungs, show promise due to their more occlusive system, offering enhanced performance. Yet, these devices lack evaluation in the realm of opioids, particularly in terms of objective nociception measurement.
Pupillometry, specifically PUAL (pupillary unrest in ambient light), stands out as an objective technique capable of quantifying nociception or opioid impregnation. PUAL monitors variations in pupil diameter over time, and previous studies have indicated an inverse correlation between the analgesic response to opioid treatment and PUAL amplitude, suggesting it could serve as a marker of central opioid impregnation. However, scientific evidence in alert emergency medicine patients remains lacking. Additionally, standard clinical pharmacodynamic evaluation criteria for opioids are not well-suited to the variability of therapeutic responses in emergency situations.
Pharmacometric models offer a quantitative approach to understanding relationships between administered drugs, clinico-biological covariates, exposure, and responses (biomarkers, efficacy, safety) as they evolve over time in individual patients and populations. This pilot study aims to evaluate the feasibility, safety, effects, and robustness of nebulized fentanyl administration via facial aerosol or intranasal routes in a population of adult healthy volunteers, employing equivalent analgesic doses. PUAL will serve as an objective pharmacodynamic marker of central opioid impregnation, coupled with pharmacokinetic modeling of nebulized fentanyl administered via facial aerosol or intranasally. The development of a pharmacometric model using a population-based approach aims to establish fentanyl titration strategies based on the objective of reducing PUAL while ensuring central opioid impregnation.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Facial Nebulization | Experimental | Fentanyl's facial nebulization in healthy volunteers. |
|
| Intranasal | Experimental | Fentanyl's intranasal inhalation in healthy volunteers. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fentanyl - Inhalation by facial nebulization | Drug | 3 administrations based on a weight-dependent threshold (40 µg per administration for a weight < 70kg and 50 µg per administration for a weight ≥ 70kg). |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Measurement of [F] bioavailability via facial nebulization and intranasal inhalation. | Bioavailability [F] will be expressed as percent mean +/- standard deviation for each group. | 6 hours |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Measurement of maximum decrease in PUAL (pupillary under ambient light) between facial nebulization and intranasal inhalation. | Maximum decrease in PUAL will be expressed as percent of baseline value +/- standard deviation for each group. | 6 hours |
| Measurement of the difference between observed and predicted PUAL values by a PK/PD model. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cassandre Follet | Contact | +33232888990 | 60451 | cassandre.follet@chu-rouen.fr |
| Florian Vallin | Contact | +3323288 | 6697 | florian.vallin@chu-rouen.fr |
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University Hospital, Rouen | Recruiting | Rouen | France | 76031 | France |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 27663766 | Background | Barksdale AN, Hackman JL, Williams K, Gratton MC. ED triage pain protocol reduces time to receiving analgesics in patients with painful conditions. Am J Emerg Med. 2016 Dec;34(12):2362-2366. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2016.08.051. Epub 2016 Aug 27. | |
| 21119516 | Background | Gueant S, Taleb A, Borel-Kuhner J, Cauterman M, Raphael M, Nathan G, Ricard-Hibon A. Quality of pain management in the emergency department: results of a multicentre prospective study. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2011 Feb;28(2):97-105. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e3283418fb0. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000377 | Agnosia |
| D004630 | Emergencies |
| D059787 | Acute Pain |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010468 | Perceptual Disorders |
| D019954 | Neurobehavioral Manifestations |
| D009461 | Neurologic Manifestations |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Fentanyl - Nebulisation | Drug | 3 administrations based on a weight-dependent threshold (20 µg/administration and for a weight < 70kg and 30 µg/administration for a weight ≥ 70kg). The dose of each bolus will be distributed at equivalent volume in both nasal pits |
|
|
The difference between observed and predicted values will be expressed as RMSE in percent. |
| 6 hours |
| Time required to achieve >30% decrease in PUAL compared to baseline. | Time required for >30% decrease in PUAL will be expressed in minutes +/- standard deviation for each group. | 6 hours |
| To assess respiratory tolerance | Using the respiratory rate and pulse oxygen saturation for respiratory tolerance | 8 hours |
| To assess neurological tolerance | Using the Ramsay score for neurological tolerance | 8 hours |
| To assess hemodynamic tolerance | Using the heart rate and blood pressure for hemodynamic tolerance | 8 hours |
| Measurement of administration comfort score using a visual analog scale ranging from 0 (maximum discomfort) to 10 (optimal comfort) (unitless). | Administration comfort score will be expressed as mean +/- standard deviation for both groups. | 6 hours |
| 18606320 | Background | Lvovschi V, Aubrun F, Bonnet P, Bouchara A, Bendahou M, Humbert B, Hausfater P, Riou B. Intravenous morphine titration to treat severe pain in the ED. Am J Emerg Med. 2008 Jul;26(6):676-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2007.10.025. |
| 35338897 | Background | Galinski M, Robledo JB, Tellier E, Catoire P, De La Riviere C, Lvovschi V, Gil-Jardine C. Are Patients with Chronic Pain Less Satisfied with Their ED Management Than Non-Chronic Pain Patients? Am J Emerg Med. 2022 Jun;56:7-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2022.03.032. Epub 2022 Mar 19. No abstract available. |
| 21867860 | Background | Mudd S. Intranasal fentanyl for pain management in children: a systematic review of the literature. J Pediatr Health Care. 2011 Sep-Oct;25(5):316-22. doi: 10.1016/j.pedhc.2010.04.011. Epub 2010 Jun 17. |
| 28967529 | Background | Adelgais KM, Brent A, Wathen J, Tong S, Massanari D, Deakyne S, Sills MR. Intranasal Fentanyl and Quality of Pediatric Acute Care. J Emerg Med. 2017 Nov;53(5):607-615.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2017.05.027. Epub 2017 Sep 28. |
| 11927479 | Background | Hudson RJ, Thomson IR, Henderson BT, Singh K, Harding G, Peterson DJ. Validation of fentanyl pharmacokinetics in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. Can J Anaesth. 2002 Apr;49(4):388-92. doi: 10.1007/BF03017328. |
| 40615143 | Derived | Follet C, Dumont A, Roussel M, Gillibert A, Boedard C, Quillard M, Ruault S, Vallin F, Donnadieu N, Nunes Ferreira D, Pereira T, Joly LM, Lvovschi V, Duflot T. AEROfen: protocol for a phase I, open-label, randomised crossover study evaluating the efficiency of nebulised fentanyl in healthy volunteers - comparing facial versus intranasal administration via pharmacometric modelling. BMJ Open. 2025 Jul 3;15(7):e091125. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-091125. |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
| D020969 | Disease Attributes |
| D010335 | Pathologic Processes |
| D010146 | Pain |