Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1F31DA058452 | U.S. NIH Grant/Contract | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) | NIH |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Project RESTART (Resisting STigma And Revaluating your Thoughts) is a theory-informed, 4-week automated text message intervention to address self-stigma in people who use drugs. The intervention delivers two daily messages to participants for four weeks (56 messages total). Messages are designed to address four components of Stigma Resistance Theory: Not believing stigma/catching and challenging stigmatizing thoughts; empowering oneself through learning about substance use and one's own recovery; maintaining one's recovery and proving stigma wrong; and developing a meaningful identity and purpose apart from one's substance use.
This study is a single-group pilot trial to determine whether the intervention is feasible and acceptable to participants. All participants will receive the intervention. The primary outcomes are changes in stigma resistance and self-stigma from baseline to 4-week follow-up using self-report. Implementation and process outcomes will be measured to inform future intervention refinement.
Nearly 850,000 Americans have died from overdose in the past two decades, and mortality reached an all-time high during the COVID-19 pandemic. Substance use disorders (SUD) are more highly stigmatized than other health conditions (e.g., HIV, mental illness). SUD stigma prevents uptake of treatment and harm reduction among people who use drugs (PWUD), contributing to needless morbidity (e.g., infectious disease) and mortality (e.g., overdose), and explains in part why only 6.5% of Americans with SUD received past year treatment. Though key federal agencies have identified stigma as a strategic priority in the epidemic, little is known about how to conceptualize and address SUD stigma compared with other health conditions.
Strategies to address SUD self-stigma, in particular, are severely lacking. Self-stigma manifests in PWUD as internalized stereotypes and fear of experienced stigma, leading to the so-called 'why try' phenomenon in which the stigmatized are disempowered from pursuing life goals. SUD self-stigma is associated with numerous psychosocial outcomes including depression, anxiety, diminished quality of life, maladaptive coping and leads to delays in treatment and harm reduction seeking and retention. To date, SUD interventions have overwhelmingly targeted public stigma such as treatment provider attitudes, while there is a remarkable dearth of evidence-based interventions for addressing self-stigma in PWUD.
Stigma resistance, a coping strategy that promotes resilience through empowerment and positive identity formation, is a promising approach to reducing self-stigma. Stigma resistance is associated with multiple psychosocial outcomes, including reductions in self-stigma and improvements in quality of life, self-efficacy, hope, help-seeking, and recovery. Stigma resistance includes both cognitive and behavioral strategies, such as catching and challenging stigmatizing thoughts, forming positive alternative identities, and empowering oneself through learning about substance use. These strategies align directly with techniques used in the HIV/AIDS and mental illness self-stigma intervention literature. Stigma resistance thus serves as an ideal conceptual framework and menu of strategies for the present study's self-stigma reduction intervention.
Project RESTART (Resisting STigma And Revaluating your Thoughts) is a theory-informed, 4-week automated text message intervention to address self-stigma in people who use drugs. The intervention delivers two daily messages to participants for four weeks (56 messages total). Messages are designed to address four components of Stigma Resistance Theory: Not believing stigma/catching and challenging stigmatizing thoughts; empowering oneself through learning about substance use and one's own recovery; maintaining one's recovery and proving stigma wrong; and developing a meaningful identity and purpose apart from one's substance use.
The specific aim of this study is to evaluate feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary effectiveness of the text message intervention to increase stigma resistance and reduce self-stigma. We will conduct a single-group pilot trial of the intervention among 30 rural Ohio PWUD in active use and collect quantitative and qualitative data at baseline and four-week follow-up.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intervention arm | Experimental | Participants in the intervention arm will receive 56 text messages over 4-weeks. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RESTART | Behavioral | Project RESTART (Resisting STigma And Revaluating your Thoughts) is a theory-informed, 4-week automated text message intervention to address self-stigma in people who use drugs. The intervention delivers two daily messages to participants for four weeks (56 messages total). Messages address the four components of the personal level of Stigma Resistance Theory: Not believing stigma/catching and challenging stigmatizing thoughts; empowering oneself through learning about substance use and one's own recovery; maintaining one's recovery and proving stigma wrong; and developing a meaningful identity and purpose apart from one's substance use. Content is informed by evidence-based psychotherapeutic approaches (e.g., Acceptance and Commitment Therapy) and health communication theory (e.g., Elaboration Likelihood Model). Messages include psychoeducation about substance use and stigma, coping advice, and suggestions for how to set personal goals, identify values, and build self-esteem. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Stigma Resistance Scale (SRS) Score | This is a 20-item Likert-type scale that assesses participants' capacity to resist stigma in five domains (self-other differentiation, personal identity, personal cognitions, peer stigma resistance, public stigma resistance). All items are scored such that higher scores reflect greater stigma resistance. Total scale score ranges from 20-100. | Baseline, 4-week follow-up visit |
| Change in Substance Abuse Self-Stigma Scale (SASSS) Score | This is a 40-item Likert-type scale that assesses degree to which participants internalize judgment for their substance use and fear experiencing stigma from others. The scale includes four subscales: self-devaluation (8 items), fear of enacted stigma (9 items), stigma avoidance (13 items), and values disengagement (10 items). Total scale score ranges from 40-200, where higher scores reflect higher levels of self-stigma. The self-devaluation, fear of enacted stigma, and stigma avoidance subscales are scored normally, while the values disengagement subscale is reverse scored. | Baseline, 4-week follow-up visit |
| Percentage of Prospective Participants Eligible for Participation (Feasibility - Recruitment) | Percentage of potential participants screened for study eligibility who are eligible for participation. | From first recruitment visit to last recruitment visit (up to 4 weeks) |
| Percentage of Prospective Participants Recruited Into Study (Feasibility - Enrollment) | Percentage of potential participants screened for study eligibility who enroll in the study. | From first recruitment visit to last enrollment visit (up to 4 weeks) |
| Time to Sample Saturation (Feasibility - Recruitment) | Time in days to enroll the full sample size (n=30), starting from the first recruitment visit |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Adult Dispositional Hope Scale Score | This is a 12-item Likert-type scale that assesses participants' hope (i.e., positive attitude toward the future). Total scale score ranges from 12-96, where higher scores indicate greater hope. | Baseline, 4-week follow-up visit |
| Change in Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale Score |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Adams L Sibley, MPH | Doctoral Candidate | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SHRPS Syringe Service Program | Portsmouth | Ohio | 45662 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 40057241 | Derived | Sibley AL, Muessig KE, Noar SM, Gottfredson O'Shea N, Miller WC, Go VF. Promoting substance use stigma resistance through an automated text message intervention (project RESTART): Outcomes of a pilot feasibility trial. J Subst Use Addict Treat. 2025 May;172:209671. doi: 10.1016/j.josat.2025.209671. Epub 2025 Mar 6. | |
| 39121478 | Derived | Sibley AL, Noar SM, Muessig KE, O'Shea NG, Paquette CE, Spears AG, Miller WC, Go VF. An Automated Text Messaging Intervention to Reduce Substance Use Self-Stigma (Project RESTART): Protocol for a Feasibility and Acceptability Pilot Study. JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Aug 9;13:e59224. doi: 10.2196/59224. |
Not provided
Not provided
All of the individual participant data collected during the trial, after deidentification, may be provided to researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal to achieve the proposal's aims.
beginning 9 and continuing for 36 months following publication
Deidentified individual data that supports the results will be shared beginning 9 to 36 months following publication provided the investigator who proposes to use the data has approval from an Institutional Review Board (IRB), Independent Ethics Committee (IEC), or Research Ethics Board (REB), as applicable, and executes a data use/sharing agreement with UNC. Requests should be submitted via email to the Principal Investigator at asibley@live.unc.edu.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Intervention Arm | Participants in the intervention arm will receive 56 text messages over 4-weeks. RESTART: Project RESTART (Resisting STigma And Revaluating your Thoughts) is a theory-informed, 4-week automated text message intervention to address self-stigma in people who use drugs. The intervention delivers two daily messages to participants for four weeks (56 messages total). Messages address the four components of the personal level of Stigma Resistance Theory: Not believing stigma/catching and challenging stigmatizing thoughts; empowering oneself through learning about substance use and one's own recovery; maintaining one's recovery and proving stigma wrong; and developing a meaningful identity and purpose apart from one's substance use. Content is informed by evidence-based psychotherapeutic approaches (e.g., Acceptance and Commitment Therapy) and health communication theory (e.g., Elaboration Likelihood Model). Messages include psychoeducation about substance use and stigma, coping advice, and suggestions for how to set personal goals, identify values, and build self-esteem. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Intervention Arm | Participants in the intervention arm will receive 56 text messages over 4-weeks. RESTART: Project RESTART (Resisting STigma And Revaluating your Thoughts) is a theory-informed, 4-week automated text message intervention to address self-stigma in people who use drugs. The intervention delivers two daily messages to participants for four weeks (56 messages total). Messages address the four components of the personal level of Stigma Resistance Theory: Not believing stigma/catching and challenging stigmatizing thoughts; empowering oneself through learning about substance use and one's own recovery; maintaining one's recovery and proving stigma wrong; and developing a meaningful identity and purpose apart from one's substance use. Content is informed by evidence-based psychotherapeutic approaches (e.g., Acceptance and Commitment Therapy) and health communication theory (e.g., Elaboration Likelihood Model). Messages include psychoeducation about substance use and stigma, coping advice, and suggestions for how to set personal goals, identify values, and build self-esteem. |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Change in Stigma Resistance Scale (SRS) Score | This is a 20-item Likert-type scale that assesses participants' capacity to resist stigma in five domains (self-other differentiation, personal identity, personal cognitions, peer stigma resistance, public stigma resistance). All items are scored such that higher scores reflect greater stigma resistance. Total scale score ranges from 20-100. | Includes participants not lost-to-follow-up with complete data. | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | score on a scale | Baseline, 4-week follow-up visit |
|
From the time of signing informed consent, through study completion, a total of 1 month.
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Intervention Arm | Participants in the intervention arm will receive 56 text messages over 4-weeks. RESTART: Project RESTART (Resisting STigma And Revaluating your Thoughts) is a theory-informed, 4-week automated text message intervention to address self-stigma in people who use drugs. The intervention delivers two daily messages to participants for four weeks (56 messages total). Messages address the four components of the personal level of Stigma Resistance Theory: Not believing stigma/catching and challenging stigmatizing thoughts; empowering oneself through learning about substance use and one's own recovery; maintaining one's recovery and proving stigma wrong; and developing a meaningful identity and purpose apart from one's substance use. Content is informed by evidence-based psychotherapeutic approaches (e.g., Acceptance and Commitment Therapy) and health communication theory (e.g., Elaboration Likelihood Model). Messages include psychoeducation about substance use and stigma, coping advice, and suggestions for how to set personal goals, identify values, and build self-esteem. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adams Sibley | University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill | 423-227-9198 | asibley@live.unc.edu |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | Feb 19, 2024 | Jun 8, 2024 | Prot_SAP_001.pdf |
| ICF | No | No | Yes | Informed Consent Form | Feb 19, 2024 | Jul 2, 2024 | ICF_002.pdf |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D057545 | Social Stigma |
| D019966 | Substance-Related Disorders |
| D000092862 | Psychological Well-Being |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D012919 | Social Behavior |
| D001519 | Behavior |
| D064419 | Chemically-Induced Disorders |
| D001523 | Mental Disorders |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| From first recruitment visit to last enrollment visit (up to 4 weeks) |
| Percentage of Participants Retained in Study (Feasibility - Retention) | Percentage of participants enrolled in the study who are retained through study completion (i.e., complete 4-week follow-up survey). | From first enrollment visit to study completion date (up to 8 weeks) |
| Theoretical Framework of Acceptability (TFA) User Questionnaire Score (Acceptability - User) | This is a 16-item Likert-type questionnaire designed to assess acceptability of the intervention from the participants' perspective along the eight dimensions of the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability: affective attitude, burden, ethicality, intervention coherence, opportunity costs, perceived effectiveness, self-efficacy, and general acceptability. Total score ranges from 16-64, with higher scores indicating greater acceptability of the intervention. | 4-week follow-up visit |
| Percentage of Participants With High Text Message Frequency (Feasibility - User) | Percentage of participants who report "every day" to the 5-point Likert-type survey question "Before the start of this program, how often did you send or receive text messages?" | 4-week follow-up visit |
| Percentage of Participants With High Text Messaging Comfort (Feasibility - User) | Percentage of participants who report "very comfortable" or "comfortable" to the 5-point Likert-type survey question "Before the start of this program, how comfortable were you with sending or receiving text messages?" | 4-week follow-up visit |
| Percentage of Participants With Cell Phone Device Challenges (Feasibility - User) | Percentage of participants who respond "yes" to the binary survey question "Between the start of the program and now, did you experience any challenges or changes with your phone (e.g., lost, broken) that prevented you from receiving or reading text messages?" | 4-week follow-up visit |
| Percentage of Participants With Cell Phone Plan Challenges (Feasibility - User) | Percentage of participants who respond "yes" to the binary survey question "Between the start of the program and now, did you experience any challenges or changes with your phone number or phone plan (e.g., changed number, ran out of minutes) that prevented you from receiving or reading text messages?" | 4-week follow-up visit |
| Percentage of Participants Who Read Messages Daily (Feasibility - User) | Percentage of participants who respond "As soon as I saw them" or "Later that day" to the 5-point Likert-type survey question "On average, when would you read the text message you received?" | 4-week follow-up visit |
This is a 10-item Likert-type scale that assesses participants' self-esteem. Total scale score range from 10-40, where higher scores indicate greater self-esteem. |
| Baseline, 4-week follow-up visit |
| years |
|
| Sex/Gender, Customized | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Educational Attainment | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Employment Status | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Substance Abuse Self-Stigma Scale | This is a 40-item Likert-type scale that assesses degree to which participants internalize judgment for their substance use and fear experiencing stigma from others. The scale includes four subscales: self-devaluation (8 items), fear of enacted stigma (9 items), stigma avoidance (13 items), and values disengagement (10 items). Total scale score ranges from 40-200, where higher scores reflect higher levels of self-stigma. The self-devaluation, fear of enacted stigma, and stigma avoidance subscales are scored normally, while the values disengagement subscale is reverse scored. | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale |
|
| Stigma Resistance Scale | This is a 20-item Likert-type scale that assesses participants' capacity to resist stigma in five domains (self-other differentiation, personal identity, personal cognitions, peer stigma resistance, public stigma resistance). All items are scored such that higher scores reflect greater stigma resistance. Total scale score ranges from 20-100. | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale |
|
| Adult Dispositional Hope Scale | This is a 12-item Likert-type scale that assesses participants' hope (i.e., positive attitude toward the future). Total scale score ranges from 12-96, where higher scores indicate greater hope. | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale |
|
| Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale | This is a 10-item Likert-type scale that assesses participants' self-esteem. Total scale score range from 10-40, where higher scores indicate greater self-esteem. | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale |
|
|
|
| Primary | Change in Substance Abuse Self-Stigma Scale (SASSS) Score | This is a 40-item Likert-type scale that assesses degree to which participants internalize judgment for their substance use and fear experiencing stigma from others. The scale includes four subscales: self-devaluation (8 items), fear of enacted stigma (9 items), stigma avoidance (13 items), and values disengagement (10 items). Total scale score ranges from 40-200, where higher scores reflect higher levels of self-stigma. The self-devaluation, fear of enacted stigma, and stigma avoidance subscales are scored normally, while the values disengagement subscale is reverse scored. | Includes participants not lost-to-follow-up with complete data. | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | score on a scale | Baseline, 4-week follow-up visit |
|
|
|
| Primary | Percentage of Prospective Participants Eligible for Participation (Feasibility - Recruitment) | Percentage of potential participants screened for study eligibility who are eligible for participation. | Includes all screened prospective participants | Posted | Number | Percentage of participants | From first recruitment visit to last recruitment visit (up to 4 weeks) |
|
|
|
| Primary | Percentage of Prospective Participants Recruited Into Study (Feasibility - Enrollment) | Percentage of potential participants screened for study eligibility who enroll in the study. | Includes eligible prospective participants | Posted | Number | Percentage of participants | From first recruitment visit to last enrollment visit (up to 4 weeks) |
|
|
|
| Primary | Time to Sample Saturation (Feasibility - Recruitment) | Time in days to enroll the full sample size (n=30), starting from the first recruitment visit | Posted | Number | days | From first recruitment visit to last enrollment visit (up to 4 weeks) |
|
|
|
| Primary | Percentage of Participants Retained in Study (Feasibility - Retention) | Percentage of participants enrolled in the study who are retained through study completion (i.e., complete 4-week follow-up survey). | Posted | Number | Percentage of participants | From first enrollment visit to study completion date (up to 8 weeks) |
|
|
|
| Primary | Theoretical Framework of Acceptability (TFA) User Questionnaire Score (Acceptability - User) | This is a 16-item Likert-type questionnaire designed to assess acceptability of the intervention from the participants' perspective along the eight dimensions of the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability: affective attitude, burden, ethicality, intervention coherence, opportunity costs, perceived effectiveness, self-efficacy, and general acceptability. Total score ranges from 16-64, with higher scores indicating greater acceptability of the intervention. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | 4-week follow-up visit |
|
|
|
| Primary | Percentage of Participants With High Text Message Frequency (Feasibility - User) | Percentage of participants who report "every day" to the 5-point Likert-type survey question "Before the start of this program, how often did you send or receive text messages?" | Posted | Number | Percentage of participants | 4-week follow-up visit |
|
|
|
| Primary | Percentage of Participants With High Text Messaging Comfort (Feasibility - User) | Percentage of participants who report "very comfortable" or "comfortable" to the 5-point Likert-type survey question "Before the start of this program, how comfortable were you with sending or receiving text messages?" | Posted | Number | Percentage of participants | 4-week follow-up visit |
|
|
|
| Primary | Percentage of Participants With Cell Phone Device Challenges (Feasibility - User) | Percentage of participants who respond "yes" to the binary survey question "Between the start of the program and now, did you experience any challenges or changes with your phone (e.g., lost, broken) that prevented you from receiving or reading text messages?" | Posted | Number | Percentage of participants | 4-week follow-up visit |
|
|
|
| Primary | Percentage of Participants With Cell Phone Plan Challenges (Feasibility - User) | Percentage of participants who respond "yes" to the binary survey question "Between the start of the program and now, did you experience any challenges or changes with your phone number or phone plan (e.g., changed number, ran out of minutes) that prevented you from receiving or reading text messages?" | Posted | Number | Percentage of participants | 4-week follow-up visit |
|
|
|
| Primary | Percentage of Participants Who Read Messages Daily (Feasibility - User) | Percentage of participants who respond "As soon as I saw them" or "Later that day" to the 5-point Likert-type survey question "On average, when would you read the text message you received?" | Posted | Number | Percentage of participants | 4-week follow-up visit |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in Adult Dispositional Hope Scale Score | This is a 12-item Likert-type scale that assesses participants' hope (i.e., positive attitude toward the future). Total scale score ranges from 12-96, where higher scores indicate greater hope. | Includes participants not lost-to-follow-up with complete data. | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | score on a scale | Baseline, 4-week follow-up visit |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale Score | This is a 10-item Likert-type scale that assesses participants' self-esteem. Total scale score range from 10-40, where higher scores indicate greater self-esteem. | Includes participants not lost-to-follow-up with complete data. | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | score on a scale | Baseline, 4-week follow-up visit |
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 30 |
| 0 |
| 30 |
| 0 |
| 30 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| D010549 |
| Personal Satisfaction |
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| Less than once a month |
|
| Never |
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| Somewhat uncomfortable |
|
| Extremely uncomfortable |
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|
|