Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| NU2GGH001927 | Other Grant/Funding Number | Centers for Disease Control and Prevention |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Ministry of Health, Tanzania | OTHER_GOV |
| President Office Regional Administration and Local Government, Tanzania | UNKNOWN |
| Centers for Disease Control and Prevention | FED |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The goal of this observational study was to evaluate the safety and acceptability of the ShangRing device for male circumcision among men in Shinyanga, Tanzania. The main question aims to answer both provider acceptability (practicality of device use and placement and removal times) and client acceptability (comfort during placement and removal, experience while wearing the ring, and penile appearance after healing). Participants voluntarily underwent male circumcision using the ShangRing device and before being discharged, were interviewed about their experience. Participants were also interviewed at device removal day (day 7), during a follow-up phone call (day 10), a sample were selected to participate in in-depth interviews (day28), and finally all men were asked to return for a follow-up visit (day 49).
Medical circumcision devices have the potential to accelerate delivery of male circumcision by making the procedure quicker and easier, while remaining as safe as surgical circumcision. Thus, circumcision devices may facilitate expansion of adult male circumcision programs for HIV prevention and address some of the common capacity issues in the U.S. President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) priority countries for male circumcision.
One promising device for adult male circumcision is ShangRing, which was prequalified by the World Health Organization (WHO) in 2015 for males aged 13 and older. WHO has created a framework for introducing circumcision devices in a country. This framework recommends countries take a methodical approach to introducing circumcision devices, evaluating acceptability and safety within its health system before making widespread adoption.
Evaluation Goal: To evaluate the safety and acceptability of the ShangRing device for nonsurgical circumcision in routine clinical settings, as a part of a comprehensive HIV prevention program for males in voluntary medical male circumcisions (VMMC) programs.
Evaluation Endpoints: the proportion of males experiencing mild, moderate and severe adverse events (AEs) associated with ShangRing circumcision procedures, including both intra- and post-operative events, and all device-related malfunctions (e.g., early spontaneous detachment).
Evaluation Design
Training Phase: this phase was used to evaluate the training requirements for implementation by mid-level providers, to preliminarily assess acceptability to providers, and to monitor logistical needs. Each clinician performed no fewer than 10 ShangRing device placements, and 5 ShangRing removals before start of the next phase (implementation pilot).
Implementation Pilot: following the training period, 575 male clients were recruited to undergo circumcision with the ShangRing device in the context of routine service delivery.
Data was collected at up to at least 5 points in time: at enrollment and device placement (day 0), at device removal (day 7), during a follow-up phone call (day 10), in-depth qualitative interviews for 50 purposefully selected clients (day 28), at an in-person follow-up visit to assess wound healing (day 49), and at subsequent weekly visits to assess healing for those not completely healed at day 49. Upon completion of the implementation pilot, the data was analyzed and used to assist with policy decisions and recommendations on ShangRing use in adult male circumcision programs.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Circumcision clients | Participants who underwent the ShangRing circumcision procedure |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ShangRing | Device | The ShangRing is a sterile, single use, disposable male circumcision (MC) device that consists of two concentric plastic rings, the inner of which is lined by a silicone pad, which provides a smooth and non-bio reactive surface against the surgical wound. The outer ring consists of 2 halves which are hinged together at the same end. On each side of the halves there is a locking clasp which allows for locking itself with inner ring. The ShangRing device is removed seven days after placement. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Adverse Events | Total numbers and types of known adverse events (AE)s occurring among clients, including all severities of AEs (mild, moderate, severe) and serious AEs, including detailed information about all instances of device displacement/detachment/self-removal/malfunction, need for medical attention or intervention, and final outcomes in those experiencing AEs | 49 days post device placement |
| Number of Clients with Adverse Events | Total number of clients with known adverse events (AEs) (may be different from above if clients experience multiple AEs), including all severities of AEs and serious AEs | 49 days post device placement |
| Descriptions of Adverse Events | A description of each adverse event by type and classification, severity, time of occurrence (during placement, in situ, or during removal) time of detection (days post-application and/or post-removal) captured as date AE is diagnosed, clinical management, and resolution | 49 days post device placement |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Provider Training | Determine the training needed for proficiency, including number of procedures required under supervision to become certified as fully proficient. This will involve analyzing AE rates stratified by during training and post-training in addition to overall. | 49 days post device placement |
| Client Follow-up Visit Rate |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
These may include diabetes, peripheral vascular disease, cancer, bleeding disorders, and/or current moderate or severe infectious illness.
Men and boys who choose to undergo voluntary medical male circumcision
Not provided
Shinyanga is one of the 31 regions, in the Lake Zone Region of Tanzania. Shinyanga covers a total of 18,555 square kilometers. As of the 2012 census, the population of the Shinyanga region was 1,534,808. The economy of the region is primarily driven by agriculture. As of 2011, the HIV prevalence of Shinyanga was 7.4%. According to the Tanzania Demographic Health Survey and Malaria Indicator Survey, 54% of men in Shinyanga reported that they are circumcised.
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Lija Gissenge, MD, MMed | Head, HIV Prevention Unit, Tanzania Ministry of Health, Community Development, Gender and Children | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kahama District Hospital | Shinyanga | Tanzania | ||||
| Ushetu Health Centre |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 16231970 | Background | Auvert B, Taljaard D, Lagarde E, Sobngwi-Tambekou J, Sitta R, Puren A. Randomized, controlled intervention trial of male circumcision for reduction of HIV infection risk: the ANRS 1265 Trial. PLoS Med. 2005 Nov;2(11):e298. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0020298. Epub 2005 Oct 25. | |
| 17321311 | Background | Gray RH, Kigozi G, Serwadda D, Makumbi F, Watya S, Nalugoda F, Kiwanuka N, Moulton LH, Chaudhary MA, Chen MZ, Sewankambo NK, Wabwire-Mangen F, Bacon MC, Williams CF, Opendi P, Reynolds SJ, Laeyendecker O, Quinn TC, Wawer MJ. Male circumcision for HIV prevention in men in Rakai, Uganda: a randomised trial. Lancet. 2007 Feb 24;369(9562):657-66. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60313-4. |
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| The Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS). Fast track commitments to end AIDS by 2030. | View source |
Not provided
Per our data sharing agreement with the Tanzania Ministry of Health (MOH) and the local institutional review board (IRB) Ethics Review Committee, we are not authorized to share individual patient information with anyone outside the study team.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot | Yes | No | No | Study Protocol | Oct 22, 2018 | Feb 14, 2024 | Prot_000.pdf |
| ICF | No | No | Yes | Informed Consent Form | Jul 1, 2018 | Jan 18, 2023 | ICF_001.pdf |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000013 | Congenital Abnormalities |
| D000163 | Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009358 | Congenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities |
| D015658 | HIV Infections |
| D000086982 | Blood-Borne Infections |
| D003141 | Communicable Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| Jhpiego |
| OTHER |
| World Health Organization | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
Total number of clients who return for recommended follow-up at 49 days post-device placement, divided by the total number of ShangRing-circumcised clients |
| 49 days post device placement |
| Client Preference for ShangRing Over Surgical Circumcision | Proportion of ShangRing clients who report they would still choose ShangRing method over surgical circumcision. This was captured using multiple choice: "After having worn the ring for a week, would you still choose ShangRing for circumcision, or would you choose surgery?"
| At device removal (7 days post device placement) |
| Client Recommendation Rate | Proportion of clients who report they would recommend VMMC using ShangRing. This was captured with a yes/no question: "At this point would you recommend ShangRing to someone you know who is considering circumcision?" Yes No I don't know | At device removal (7 days post device placement) |
| Cosmetic Result Acceptability | Client reporting on the cosmetic result post-removal. This was captured with multiple choice: "How satisfied are you with the appearance of your penis?"
| At device removal (7 days post device placement) |
| Client Experience While Performing Routine Activities | Client reports on their experience while wearing ShangRing. This is captured with multiple choice: "How much did the ring affect you while performing day-to-day activities?"
| At device removal (7 days post device placement) |
| Client Discomfort | Clients' opinions discomfort while wearing the ShangRing. This was captured with multiple choice: "How much discomfort did you experience while wearing the ShangRing device over the past seven days?"
| At device removal (7 days post device placement) |
| Provider Ease of Application | Provider perceived ease of application, captured with a Likert scale: "I found ShangRing circumcisions to be easy to perform."
| Immediately after the completion of the provider ShangRing training |
| Provider Preference | Provider perceived preference of performing ShangRing procedures, captured with a Likert scale: "I prefer performing ShangRing procedures over surgical circumcision."
| Immediately after the completion of the provider ShangRing training |
| Provider Recommendation | Provider recommendation of ShangRing to potential clients, captured with a Likert scale: "I would advise that clients select ShangRing circumcision over surgical circumcision."
| Immediately after the completion of the provider ShangRing training |
| Description of Procedures | Measure both the ShangRing application and removal times, including the time it took for topical anesthesia to take effect | 49 days post device placement |
| Healing rate | The percentage of clients determined by a clinician to be clinically healed 49-52 days post-placement of the ShangRing device (42 days post-removal), and the time at which point all clients are clinically healed | 52 days post device placement |
| Shinyanga |
| Tanzania |
| 17321310 | Background | Bailey RC, Moses S, Parker CB, Agot K, Maclean I, Krieger JN, Williams CF, Campbell RT, Ndinya-Achola JO. Male circumcision for HIV prevention in young men in Kisumu, Kenya: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2007 Feb 24;369(9562):643-56. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60312-2. |
| Background | WHO Prequalification of Male Circumcision Devices Public Report. Product: ShangRing. WHO reference number: PQMC 0003-003-00. March 2019, version 3.0. |
| 18385906 | Background | Peng YF, Cheng Y, Wang GY, Wang SQ, Jia C, Yang BH, Zhu R, Jian SC, Li QW, Geng DW. Clinical application of a new device for minimally invasive circumcision. Asian J Androl. 2008 May;10(3):447-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-7262.2008.00411.x. |
| 19694369 | Background | Cheng Y, Peng YF, Liu YD, Tian L, Lu NQ, Su XJ, Yan ZJ, Hu JS, Lee R, Kim HH, Sokal DC, Li PS. [A recommendable standard protocol of adult male circumcision with the Chinese Shang Ring: outcomes of 328 cases in China]. Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue. 2009 Jul;15(7):584-92. Chinese. |
| 26816759 | Background | Barone MA, Li PS, Awori QD, Lee R, Goldstein M. Clinical trials using the Shang Ring device for male circumcision in Africa: a review. Transl Androl Urol. 2014 Mar;3(1):113-24. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2223-4683.2014.01.09. |
| 22343180 | Background | Barone MA, Awori QD, Li PS, Simba RO, Weaver MA, Okech JO, Aduda AO, Cherutich P, Muraguri N, Wekesa JM, Nyanchoka J, Perchal P, Masson P, Lee R, Goldstein M, Kioko J, Lusi O, Sokal DC. Randomized trial of the Shang Ring for adult male circumcision with removal at one to three weeks: delayed removal leads to detachment. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2012 Jul 1;60(3):e82-9. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e31824ea1f2. |
| 24583615 | Background | Sokal DC, Li PS, Zulu R, Awori QD, Combes SL, Simba RO, Lee R, Hart C, Perchal P, Hawry HJ, Bowa K, Goldstein M, Barone MA. Randomized controlled trial of the shang ring versus conventional surgical techniques for adult male circumcision: safety and acceptability. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2014 Apr 1;65(4):447-55. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000000061. |
| Background | Barone MA LP, Zulu R, Awori QD, et al. A Field Study of Male Circumcision Using the Shang Ring, a Minimally Invasive Disposable Device, in Routine Clinical Settings in Kenya and Zambia. 7th International AIDS Society Conference on HIV Pathogenesis, Treatment and Prevention; Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 2013. |
| 23614991 | Background | Kigozi G, Musoke R, Watya S, Kighoma N, Ssebbowa P, Serwadda D, Nalugoda F, Makumbi F, Li P, Lee R, Goldstein M, Wawer M, Sewankambo N, Gray RH. The acceptability and safety of the Shang Ring for adult male circumcision in Rakai, Uganda. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2013 Aug 15;63(5):617-21. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e3182968dda. |
| 24802412 | Background | Rech D, Bertrand JT, Thomas N, Farrell M, Reed J, Frade S, Samkange C, Obiero W, Agot K, Mahler H, Castor D, Njeuhmeli E. Surgical efficiencies and quality in the performance of voluntary medical male circumcision (VMMC) procedures in Kenya, South Africa, Tanzania, and Zimbabwe. PLoS One. 2014 May 6;9(5):e84271. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0084271. eCollection 2014. |
| 23481667 | Background | Bratt JH, Zyambo Z. Comparing direct costs of facility-based Shang Ring provision versus a standard surgical technique for voluntary medical male circumcision in Zambia. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2013 Jul 1;63(3):e109-12. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e31828e9526. |
| 25162816 | Background | Sokal DC, Li PS, Zulu R, Awori QD, Agot K, Simba RO, Combes S, Lee RK, Hart C, Lai JJ, Zyambo Z, Goldstein M, Feldblum PJ, Barone MA. Field study of adult male circumcision using the ShangRing in routine clinical settings in Kenya and Zambia. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2014 Dec 1;67(4):430-7. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000000321. |
| Background | Tanzania Commission for AIDS (TACAIDS), Zanzibar AIDS Commission (ZAC). Tanzania HIV Impact Survey (THIS) 2016-2017: Final Report. Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. December 2018. |
| Background | The United Republic of Tanzania, Voluntary medical male circumcision country operational plan: 2014-2017. November 2014. |
| 32986340 | Background | Preventing HIV Through Safe Voluntary Medical Male Circumcision for Adolescent Boys and Men in Generalized HIV Epidemics: Recommendations and Key Considerations. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2020 Aug. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK562463/ |
| Background | Kigozi G, Musoke R, Kighoma NGR. The acceptability and safety of the ShangRing for adolescent male circumcision in Rakai, Uganda. International AIDS Society Conference; 2014; Melbourne, Australia. TUPE148 p. |
| 28715157 | Background | Awori QD, Lee RK, Li PS, Moguche JN, Ouma D, Sambai B, Goldstein M, Barone MA. Use of the ShangRing circumcision device in boys below 18 years old in Kenya: results from a pilot study. J Int AIDS Soc. 2017 Jul 12;20(1):21588. doi: 10.7448/IAS.20.1.21588. |
| Tetanus and VMMC: risk according to circumcision method and risk mitigation. Report of the WHO Technical Advisory Group on Innovations in Male Circumcision - consultative review of additional information, 12 August 2016. | View source |
| Project Improving Quality VMMC (IQ) Virtual Seminar series. Virtual Roundtable on ShangRing for VMMC: Country perspectives. September 9th 2019. | View source |
| PEPFAR Dashboards. Country and Regional Program Results, Fiscal Year (FY) 2010-2016: Tanzania. May 5, 2017. | View source |
| World Health Organization. Framework for clinical evaluation of devices for male circumcision. September 2012. | View source |
| World Health Organization. Manual for male circumcision under local anesthesia and HIV prevention services for adolescent boys and men (2018). | View source |
| D007239 | Infections |
| D015229 | Sexually Transmitted Diseases, Viral |
| D012749 | Sexually Transmitted Diseases |
| D016180 | Lentivirus Infections |
| D012192 | Retroviridae Infections |
| D012327 | RNA Virus Infections |
| D014777 | Virus Diseases |
| D012897 | Slow Virus Diseases |
| D000091662 | Genital Diseases |
| D000091642 | Urogenital Diseases |
| D007153 | Immunologic Deficiency Syndromes |
| D007154 | Immune System Diseases |