Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| CPP Ile de France III | Other Identifier | 23.02645.000357-MS01 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This is a comparative, randomized, prospective, multicenter clinical investigation aimed at evaluating the efficiency and economic impact of LC-OCT (Line-field Confocal Optical Coherence Tomography) for the diagnosis and management of basal cell carcinomas.
Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most common type of skin cancer. The diagnosis and subtyping of suspicious lesions can be challenging for certain "equivocal" lesions where clinical and dermoscopic criteria do not allow for a definite diagnosis or subtyping, which determines the treatment. The most commonly used technique for the diagnosis and selection of appropriate treatment for BCC is skin biopsy. Microscopic imaging techniques allow for "optical" biopsies, which appear as an attractive alternative to traditional biopsies.
The deepLive™ device integrates LC-OCT (Line-field Confocal Optical Coherence Tomography), which is a novel microscopic imaging technology with unmatched imaging performance to date, including cellular isotropic resolution (1 μm), a penetration depth of 500 μm, and the ability to obtain real-time cross-sectional and 3D images in the same orientation as histology. Numerous multicenter studies have confirmed the high performance of this technique for the diagnosis and subtyping of BCC. However, its usefulness in the diagnostic and treatment management of BCC has not been investigated prospectively. This clinical investigation is based on the hypothesis that the use of the deepLive™ device will enable diagnostic and therapeutic management by reducing the number of consultations/procedures without compromising patient outcomes compared to a traditional management approach with biopsy(ies). This strategy could optimize the entire care pathway by reducing invasive diagnostic or therapeutic procedures and freeing up dermatological resources for other procedures. This optimization of the care pathway is expected to result in a favorable economic impact on the healthcare system.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intervention Arm: Management performed with an initial diagnosis based on the LC-OCT device | Experimental | The interventional procedure involves the management of BCC with an initial diagnosis based on the deepLive™ device. The imaging is performed by placing the probe tip in contact with the patient's skin after applying an immersion oil (paraffin) to the imaging area. The examination lasts only a few minutes and is painless. An integrated dermoscopic targeting system allows the operator to ensure proper positioning of the probe on the lesion and to ensure that the entire lesion has been captured for an accurate diagnosis. The images are displayed in real-time during the examination and directly evaluated by the investigator, who has the option to save images/videos at their discretion. A final evaluation with the deepLive™ device will also be performed during the 1-year follow-up, and intermediate evaluations may also be performed with the deepLive™ device depending on the initial management of BCC. |
|
| Control Arm: Standard management with an initial diagnosis based on skin biopsy | Active Comparator | The control procedure corresponds to standard management of BCC with an initial diagnosis based on skin biopsy (standard management arm). The biopsy will be performed according to the standard practice of each center, using a 2 to 6 mm punch or shave biopsy, with prior injection of a local anesthetic. A final evaluation with the deepLive™ device will also be performed during the 1-year follow-up. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| diagnosis based on deepLive™ LC-OCT device | Diagnostic Test | Management of BCC with an initial diagnosis based on the deepLive™ device using LC-OCT technology. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| The primary objective is to demonstrate, at 1 year, the clinical non-inferiority and organizational and economic superiority of the management of primary BCC through diagnosis with LC-OCT compared to traditional management. | The primary objective is defined by a family of primary criteria that will be tested sequentially in a hierarchical manner. The clinical non-inferiority will be assessed by the proportion of success which is defined as the absence of residual or recurrent cancerous or precancerous lesions after 1 year of primary BCC through diagnosis with LC-OCT, as compared to traditional management. | from enrollment to the 1 year follow up |
| The primary objective is to demonstrate, at 1 year, the clinical non-inferiority and organizational and economic superiority of the management of primary BCC through diagnosis with LC-OCT compared to traditional management. | The primary objective is defined by a family of primary criteria that will be tested sequentially in a hierarchical manner. Organizational effectiveness will be evaluated by measuring the total time spent by dermatologists and pathologists (in hours) for managing primary BCC through diagnosis with LC-OCT, as compared to traditional management. | from enrollment to the 1 year follow up |
| The primary objective is to demonstrate, at 1 year, the clinical non-inferiority and organizational and economic superiority of the management of primary BCC through diagnosis with LC-OCT compared to traditional management. | The primary objective is defined by a family of primary criteria that will be tested sequentially in a hierarchical manner. Economic superiority will be assessed by comparing the total cost of management (€) of primary BCC through diagnosis with LC-OCT to traditional management. | from enrollment to the 1 year follow up |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Compare, after the diagnosis announcement and at 1 year, the quality of life of patients in the LC-OCT arm versus the standard management arm. | Quality of life will be assessed using the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire | from enrollment to the 1 year follow up |
| Compare, after the diagnosis announcement and at 1 year, the anxiety levels of patients in the LC-OCT arm versus the standard management arm. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Patient with one or more clinically suspicious lesions of BCC for which:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Philippe Saiag | Contact | 800-555-5555 | philippe.saiag@uvsq.fr | |
| Maxime Cazalas | Contact | 800-555-5555 | info@damae-medical.com |
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hôpital Ambroise Paré | Boulogne-Billancourt | 92100 | France |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| diagnosis based on skin biopsy | Diagnostic Test | Control Arm: Standard management with an initial diagnosis based on skin biopsy |
|
|
Anxiety will be assessed using a visual analog scale (score 0 - 10) |
| from enrollment to the 1 year follow up |
| Compare patient satisfaction with their management at 1 year in the LC-OCT arm versus the standard management arm. | Patient satisfaction will be evaluated using a Likert scale focused on the overall management of the cutaneous lesion. | from enrollment to the 1 year follow up |
| Evaluate the performance of LC-OCT for the diagnosis and subtyping of BCC for all patients operated on or biopsied in the LC-OCT arm. | Performance will be evaluated based on the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), and accuracy of LC-OCT for the diagnosis and subtyping of BCC in all patients operated on or biopsied in the LC-OCT arm, using histological diagnosis as the gold standard. | from enrollment to the 1 year follow up |
| Compare dermatologists' satisfaction with patient management in the LC-OCT arm versus the standard management arm | Physician satisfaction will be evaluated using a Likert scale focused on the overall management of the cutaneous lesion. | from enrollment to the 1 year follow up |
| Estimate the actual cost of conducting the diagnosis with LC-OCT technology. | Actual cost (€) of conducting the diagnosis with deepLive™ measured using micro-costing methodology | from enrollment to the 1 year follow up |
| Compare healthcare consumption between the two groups at 1 year. | Typology of healthcare consumption at 1 year in each group to identify differences between the two groups in terms of: consultations, treatments, hospitalizations, medical procedures, laboratory tests, imaging, etc. | from enrollment to the 1 year follow up |
| Conduct a cost-consequence analysis of patient management with LC-OCT technology versus standard management. | The descriptive cost-consequence analysis will analyze the difference in patient management costs at 1 year in relation to the impacts of deepLive™ on other clinical and organizational criteria. | from enrollment to the 1 year follow up |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D002280 | Carcinoma, Basal Cell |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D002277 | Carcinoma |
| D009375 | Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial |
| D009370 | Neoplasms by Histologic Type |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
| D018295 | Neoplasms, Basal Cell |
Not provided
Not provided