Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This research proposal is evaluating the clinical performance of using self-adhering flowable resin composite in repairing old occlusal defective resin composite versus conventional flowable resin composite restoration over 18 months.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Conventional flowable nano filled resin composite | Active Comparator | Repairing the old defective class I composite restoration by conventional nano filled flowable resin composite. |
|
| Self adhesive flowable resin composite | Experimental | Repairing the old defective class I composite restoration by self adhering flowable resin composite. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VertiseTM flowable composite (Kerr,USA) | Procedure | self adhesive flowable resin composite restoration. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Restoration clinical performance using FDI criteria | FDI criteria mechanical parameters | assessment will be done after the treatment then 6 months, 12 months and18 months. |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
• Patients with defective restorations that dictate replacement
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Faculty of Dentistry | Cairo | 113311 | Egypt |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
parallel assignment
Not provided
Not provided
double ( participants, outcomes assessor) participants and both assessors will be blind to the type of material used