Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Misr International University | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
To address the gap of knowledge in comparing between the bone augmentation outcomes with or without tacks for membrane stabilization
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Patient showing horizontal defect and treated with GBR stabilized with Tacs | Active Comparator | Fixation |
|
| Patient showing horizontal defect and treated with GBR stabilized with no Tacs | Experimental | No Fixation |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guided Bone regeneration | Procedure | After local anesthesia, a crestal incision will be performed followed by full-thickness mucoperiosteal flap elevation Flap advancement will be attained through periosteal scoring of the buccal; The resorbable collagen membrane (Bio Gide, Geistlich AG) will be trimmed to the defect size. Xenograft (Bio-Oss) together with scrapped autogenous bone will be mixed and placed at the surgical site. The membrane will positioned over the graft and tucked into the lingual flap. Patient allocation concealment will be broken and the patients will be randomly assigned into two groups Patients receiving horizontal bone augmentation with resorbable collagen membrane stabilized with no tacks. The first layer will be closed with horizontal mattress sutures placed 4 mm from the incision line, and single interrupted sutures are used to close the edges of the flap. Vertical incisions are closed using single interrupted sutures and mattress suture should remain in place for at least 2 to 3 weeks |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Horizontal bone gain assessed radiographically (mm) | Using CBCT | Baseline , 4 month |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Horizontal bone gain assessed clinically (mm) | Bone Caliper | Baseline , 4 month |
| Amount of Pain | Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) (Price et al., 1983) |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Healed alveolar ridge for implant placement with:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yahya Amer, PhD | Contact | +201006194329 | yahia.hassan@miuegypt.edu.eg |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Hani ElNahass, PhD | Cairo University | Principal Investigator |
| Omnia Tawfik, PhD | Cairo University | Study Chair |
Not provided
I will check with Study chair
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| 7 days |
| Amount of Pain | Number of analgesics consumed daily for 7 days | 7 days |
| Patient satisfaction | Questionnaire - Binary | 4 month |
| Surgical Time | Stop Watch | During Surgery |
| Histological Evaluation | Core Biopsy | 4 month |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| C565149 | Spondylocostal Dysostosis 4, Autosomal Dominant |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided