Effects of Transauricular Vagal Nerve Stimulation on Interoceptive Channels in Healthy Subjects
Effects of Transauricular Vagal Nerve Stimulation on Interoceptive Channels in Healthy Subjects
Interoception, the ability to perceive, process and respond to signals originating from within the body, is crucial for maintaining healthy physiological ranges. Indeed, dysfunction in this ability has been associated with various mood and pain disorders. Based on the overlap between the anatomical pathway of this ability and the site of action of the tool, transauricular vagal nerve stimulation (taVNS) could modulate this interoception. However, little is known about the breadth, duration, and mechanism of interoception modulation by taVNS.
The study (Ethics Region Nord Jylland Denmark, N-20230022) will address these limitations, with 2 experiments with a focus on three interoceptive channels: deep muscular pressure pain, heartbeat, and thermal perception.
The first experiment will aim to corroborate and extend the pain-modulating effect of taVNS to other interoceptive functions and to vagal-activation markers. For this, 30 healthy subjects will complete a randomized, active control, crossover study. The main intervention is left concha taVNS (NEMOS, CerboMed GmbH, Erlangen, Germany) for 20 minutes (200µs duration, 25Hz, at a personalized intensity). This will be compared to an active control of identical electrical stimulation to the left earlobe. A blinding assessment inquiring which stimulation is supposed to be therapeutic will be collected. Main outcomes are pressure pain thresholds and temporal summation of pain responses acquired via cuff-pressure algometer (Cortex Technology, Aalborg University, Denmark) placed at the calf. Heartbeat perception, assessed via the heartbeat counting task, and thermal perception, assessed using a QST thermal grid, are also primary outcomes. Secondary outcomes are conditioned pain modulation, resting state electroencephalography, electrocardiography, and pupillary light reflexes. To assess whether, and how, taVNS modulates deep muscular pressure pain, heartbeat, and thermal perception, primary and secondary measurements pre, post and 30min post stimulation will be collected and compared. To assess the duration of the potential effects, these outcomes will be collected, and compared, at 5min intervals until the primary measurements are within 20% of baseline values. Given baseline is recovered, the second stimulation session will take place. Given this has not occurred within 1.5h of the cessation of the stimulation in the first stimulation session, subjects will be asked to come back at their earliest convenience.
The second experiment will additionally explore the effect of stimulation paradigm and intensity. For this, 20 healthy subjects will complete a randomized, active and sham control, crossover study. The main intervention is left concha taVNS (NEMOS, CerboMed GmbH, Erlangen, Germany) for 40 minutes (200µs duration, 25Hz). This will be compared to an active control of identical electrical stimulation to the left earlobe and sham stimulation. Stimulation intensity will be given at 2/3rd of perception to pain threshold and at pain thresholds. A burst and continuous paradigm will also be employed. A blinding assessment inquiring which stimulation is supposed to be therapeutic will be collected. Main outcomes are pressure pain thresholds acquired via cuff-pressure algometer (Cortex Technology, Aalborg University, Denmark) placed at the calf. Heartbeat perception, assessed via the heartbeat counting task is also primary outcomes. Secondary outcomes are conditioned pain modulation, resting state electroencephalography, electrocardiography, and pupillary light reflexes. Assessments will be acquire pre, during and post stimulation.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria: