Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This cross sectional study is aiming to compare 2 methods of clear aligner fabrication.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Press |
| ||
| Vacuum |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aligner | Device | Orthodontic alginer |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Maxillary arch dimensions | Arch lengths, Arch widths and each tooth size will be measured and compared between the 2 groups. | 6 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Model superimposition | Superimposition of the models from the 2 groups will be done and then map difference will be measured. | 6 months |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Maxillary arch with moderate crowding.
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Faculty of Dentistry | Recruiting | Cairo | 00202 | Egypt |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009968 | Orthodontic Appliances, Removable |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009967 | Orthodontic Appliances |
| D009970 | Orthodontics |
| D003813 | Dentistry |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided