Effect of Lidocaine Sprayed at the Laryngeal Inlet and Endotracheal Tube Cuff Versus Intravenous Lidocaine for Attenuating Hemodynamic Response During Laryngoscopy and Intubation in Neurosurgical Patients
Effect of Lidocaine Sprayed at the Laryngeal Inlet and Endotracheal Tube Cuff Versus Intravenous Lidocaine for Attenuating Hemodynamic Response During Laryngoscopy and Intubation in Neurosurgical Patients
The goal of this clinical trial is to to evaluate the efficacy of lidocaine sprayed at the laryngeal inlet combined with the endotracheal tube cuff compare with intravenous lidocaine on the hemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and intubation in patients undergoing elective neurological procedures during general anesthesia with total intravenous technique.
The main question it aims to answer is:
- Does topical lidocaine sprayed at the laryngeal inlet combined with the endotracheal tube cuff have more effect on stabilizing hemodynamic responses to laryngoscopy and intubation than intravenous lidocaine, in neurosurgical patients who undergo general anesthesia with total intravenous technique?
Participants will be recruited and randomized to receive either lidocaine spray (Group SL) or intravenous lidocaine (group IL) to blunt hemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and intubation.
Anesthetic protocol
Preoperative
Intraoperative Pre-induction phase
Intervention: prepared before induction anesthesia.
Induction phase
At 5 minutes after cisatracurium injection, direct laryngoscopy will be performed, and spray 10%lidocaine directly to the epiglottis for 4 puffs for SL group.
All the adverse events (cough, pulmonary aspiration, desaturation, hypotension, hypertension, tachycardia, bradycardia, and arrythmia) will be noted as yes or no.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Nattapho@kku.ac.th+66619719493
Nai Muang, KhonKaen 40002, Thailand
nattapho@kku.ac.th0619719493