Comparison of Outcome Between (ERACS) Versus Traditional Methods in Elective CS

Comparison of Outcome Between the Implementation of Enhanced Recovery After Elective Cesarean Section Protocol (ERACS) Versus Traditional Methods

The study is designed to evaluate the effect of implementing enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol during elective cesarean section on patient's outcome measures.

The study is designed to evaluate the effect of implementing enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol during elective cesarean section on patient outcome measures. The primary outcome is the evaluation of inpatient postpartum recovery using the Obstetric Quality of Recovery 11 score (ObsQoR-11) at the time of discharge.

Secondary outcomes are the evaluation of peak numeric postoperative pain rating score within the postoperative hospital stay, total amount of postoperative opioid consumption, postoperative nausea, and vomiting impact score after 6 hours postoperatively and at time of discharge, patient satisfaction using Leiden perioperative care patient satisfaction questionnaire (LPPSq) at time of discharge, presence of post-cesarean ileus and Hospital length to achieve criteria for discharge.

Inclusion Criteria:

• Pregnant women ASA I to ASA II aged from 18 up to 40 years. With non-complicated pregnancy undergoing elective CS.

Exclusion Criteria:

• -Age less than 18 years
• Complications (wound infection, re-exploration, caesarean hysterectomies)
• Recent documented use of opioids Allergy to any drug used during the study.-
• Patients with severe heart diseases, cardiac arrhythmia and myocardial injury.
• uncontrolled diabetic patient
• Severe liver and kidney diseases
• Coagulation defect