Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The goal of this clinical trial is to investigate post-operative pain (PEP) in teeth with symptomatic pulpitis following Vital Pulpotomy Treatments (VPT) with Calcium Silicate Cement (CSC). The main questions it aims to answer are:
Participants will:
If there is a comparison group:
Researchers will compare the post-operative pain levels in teeth with symptomatic pulpitis undergoing VPT to assess its effectiveness in reducing pain compared to a control group not undergoing the treatment.
Informed Consent:
Volunteers or parents will receive detailed information about protocols, risks, and benefits. Informed consent was obtained in writing after providing subject information, and participants could withdraw voluntarily at any time.
Sample Size Calculation:
Sample size calculation, utilizing G. Power-3.1.9.2, aimed at relationship analyses with a 95% confidence level, α=0.05, effect size of 0.30, and theoretical power of 0.80, resulting in a minimum sample size of 108.
Treatment Procedure:
Vital pulpotomy, administered by experienced professionals, involved local anesthesia, rubber dam isolation, caries removal, pulp amputation, hemostasis, application of ProRoot MTA and glass ionomer, and permanent restoration. Pain scores, assessed using the modified Wong-Baker scale, were recorded pre-treatment, at 24 and 72 hours post-procedure, along with inquiries about painkiller usage.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Patients with symptomatic pulpitis | vital permanent molars with symptomatic pulpitis in patients aged between 7-70 |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vital Pulpotomy | Procedure | Vital pulpotomy involves the removal of the coronal pulp, while MTA is used to seal the root orifices. It is clear that vital pulp treatments for symptomatic pulpitis are a more reliable, cost-effective, and generally easier option than root canal treatment (RCT) once the mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) is introduced in dentistry. In vital pulpotomy, as opposed to RCT, tooth healing and symptoms are diminished while the vitality of the tooth is maintained. Furthermore, vital pulpotomy is a significantly more practical and economical treatment alternative than RCT. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Postoperative Pain Assesment | Pain scores before and after treatment will be assessed using a modified Wong-Baker pain rating scale. The patients and parents will be given with comprehensive information and instructed to indicate their level of pain using a pain rating scale (0 = no pain, 1 = slight pain, 2 = moderate pain, 3 = severe pain) before treatment, at 24 hours, and 72 hours after the procedure. Additionally, they will be asked about the use of painkillers. | 1) on treatment day, before starting the treatment; 2)24 hours later; 3)72 hours later and 4) 1 week later |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Patients aged between 7 and 70 with a noncontributory medical history presented for endodontic treatment at the Department of Endodontics and Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Usak University, Turkey
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Berk Çelikkol, Dr | Usak University School of Dentistry | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Usak University School of Dentistry Department of Endodontics | Uşak | 64200 | Turkey (Türkiye) |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 31865629 | Background | Lin LM, Ricucci D, Saoud TM, Sigurdsson A, Kahler B. Vital pulp therapy of mature permanent teeth with irreversible pulpitis from the perspective of pulp biology. Aust Endod J. 2020 Apr;46(1):154-166. doi: 10.1111/aej.12392. Epub 2019 Dec 21. | |
| 27339631 | Background | Zanini M, Hennequin M, Cousson PY. A Review of Criteria for the Evaluation of Pulpotomy Outcomes in Mature Permanent Teeth. J Endod. 2016 Aug;42(8):1167-74. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2016.05.008. Epub 2016 Jun 20. |
Not provided
Not provided
due to possible plagiarism issues, we are kindly requesting that the study descriptions be shared only after journal publication
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D011671 | Pulpitis |
| D010149 | Pain, Postoperative |
| D014098 | Toothache |
| D010146 | Pain |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003788 | Dental Pulp Diseases |
| D014076 | Tooth Diseases |
| D009057 | Stomatognathic Diseases |
| D011183 | Postoperative Complications |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
|
| 16739540 | Background | Witherspoon DE, Small JC, Harris GZ. Mineral trioxide aggregate pulpotomies: a case series outcomes assessment. J Am Dent Assoc. 2006 May;137(5):610-8. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2006.0256. |
| D010335 | Pathologic Processes |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
| D009461 | Neurologic Manifestations |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
| D005157 | Facial Pain |