Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Action Research Group | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is now the first therapeutic option offered to high and intermediate risk patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis but even to low-risk, when the aortic valve is tricuspid and the transfemoral approach is suitable. Vascular and bleeding complications are the most frequent procedure-related unwanted events associated with increased short-term morbidity and mortality. Selection of the appropriate vascular access site and pre-closing devices as well as stent implantation mitigate these complications.
ACT-guided heparin reaching a target of 300 seconds or more is recommended prior to the placement of the guiding sheath in the common femoral artery. Protamine sulfate is the heparin antidote, which antagonizes 100% of its anti-IIa activity and 60% of its anti-Xa activity. Reversal of heparin using protamine sulfate is recommended for transapical and complicated transfemoral aortic valve placement.However, there is a great heterogeneity of protamine use in daily practice and supportive evidence for the prevention of bleeding complications as well as its safety is lacking. In addition, the radial approach for the second vascular access is more commonly used as well as the use of echo-guided femoral puncture further questioning reversal of heparin when the procedure has been successfully completed without overt bleeding complications.
Our study aims to demonstrate the superiority of a strategy of systematic ACT-guided heparin administration followed by systematic antagonization with protamine sulfate over usual of care to reduce in-hospital mortality, vascular/bleeding complications, stroke and transcient ischemic attack, myocardial infarction or red blood cell transfusion, from randomization to hospital discharge
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Systematic heparine antagonization with protamine sulphate | Experimental | Complete reversal of the Heparin administered during the TAVI achieved through the infusion of a protamine solution until the ACT returns to its baseline level. |
|
| No Systematic heparine antagonization with protamine sulphate | No Intervention | No administration of protamine solution unless a participant encounters a bleeding event requiring a surgery or percutanous intervention. |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Antagonization of heparin with protamine sulfate | Drug | A systematic use at the end of procedure of Protamine Sulfate for antagonization of heparine.1 mg of protamine sulfate neutralizes approximately 100 heparin unit. To be administered in slow infusion (10 min) not exceeding 50mg of protamine sulfate to reverse 100% of the anti-IIa activity of heparin sodium. If the ACT is not back to the baseline value after the end of this infusion, additional doses of protamine should be performed depending on the ACT value to obtain complete antagonization of anti-IIa activity of heparin sodium |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Composite of ischemic and bleeding events | The primary endpoint is defined as the first occurrence, of any event of the composite of all-cause mortality, type 2, 3 or 4 bleeding, major or minor vascular complications, stroke or TIA, myocardial infarction or any redblood transfusion. The primary endpoint will be blindly determined by a clinical event committee according to the valve Academic Research Consortium-3 (VARC-3 classifications) | From procedure to hospital discharge (or at 30 days whichever comes first) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| In hospital stay | Assessment of length of in-hospital stay in days post TAVI procedure | From procedure to hospital discharge, assessed up to 30 days |
| Bleeding complication | Assessment of the occurrence of:
|
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paul Dr GUEDENEY, MD | Contact | 0184827619 | +33 | paul.guedeney@aphp.fr |
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pitié Salpêtrière hospital | Recruiting | Paris | Île-de-France Region | 75013 | France |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001024 | Aortic Valve Stenosis |
| D006349 | Heart Valve Diseases |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000082862 | Aortic Valve Disease |
| D006331 | Heart Diseases |
| D002318 | Cardiovascular Diseases |
| D014694 | Ventricular Outflow Obstruction |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D011479 | Protamines |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009687 | Nuclear Proteins |
| D011506 | Proteins |
| D000602 | Amino Acids, Peptides, and Proteins |
| D009698 | Nucleoproteins |
Not provided
Not provided
Phase III, national, multicenter, controlled, randomized open label study in 2 parallel groups at a 1:1 ratio
Not provided
Not provided
The members of the endpoint committee will evaluate events related to both primary and secondary outcomes in a blinded manner, ensuring they are unaware of patient identities and the groups to which they were allocated through randomization.
|
| From procedure to hospital discharge (or at 30 days whichever comes first) |
| Assessement of interaction | Assessment of an interaction in the impact of systematic antagonization according to the use or not of an echo-guided femoral puncture and/or arterial radial access. These subgroups are defined at the time of randomization by stratification. | From procedure to hospital discharge (or at 30 days whichever comes first) |
| Assessement of adverse outcome | Assessment of the occurrence of:
| From procedure to hospital discharge (or at 30 days whichever comes first) |
| Assessement of long term adverse outcome | Assessment of the composite of: Death, stroke, TIA, MI and bleeding VARC type 2 or more as well as each individual endpoint | From procedure 12 months post procedure |