Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The CryoGem Trial is a research study that tests a freezing technique called cryoneurolysis to see if it helps relieve pain in adults with trigeminal neuralgia. Trigeminal neuralgia is a condition that causes severe facial pain. In this study, we want to find out if the freezing technique is effective and safe. We will do this by comparing two groups of adults with trigeminal neuralgia. One group will receive the actual treatment, while the other group will receive a fake treatment called a sham. Neither the participants nor the assessors will know which group they are in (this is called a blinded study). For the next four weeks, participants in both groups will continue recording their headaches without knowing which treatment they are receiving. After this initial period, there will be an extension period where all participants can receive treatment as needed for up to two years. The results of this study will help us decide if the freezing technique is a viable treatment option for trigeminal neuralgia. Our main goal is to see how many people in each group have a significant reduction in pain (at least 75% less pain). We will also record other important information about the participants.
We are looking to recruit up to 24 adults with trigeminal neuralgia to take part in this study. All participants will keep a daily diary for two weeks to track their headaches before starting the treatment. Then, they will be randomly assigned to either the treatment group or the sham group.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cryoneurolysis | Experimental |
| |
| Stimulation | Sham Comparator |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cryoneurolysis | Device | Cryoneurolysis |
| |
| Stimulation |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Average daily pain | Difference in number of treatment responders (≥ 75% reduction in the mean average daily pain intensity on a NRS score) at weeks 3 - 4 post-intervention for paroxysmal pain corresponding to the treated branch compared to baseline in the treatment versus the sham group. | Weeks 3 - 4 post-intervention compared to baseline |
| Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events [Safety and Tolerability] | Occurrence of treatment-emergent adverse events and serious adverse events. | Week 1-4 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| 50% responders | Difference in number of treatment responders (≥ 50% reduction in the mean average daily pain intensity on a Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) score at weeks 3 - 4 post-intervention for paroxysmal pain corresponding to the treated branch compared to baseline) in the treatment versus the sham group. | Weeks 3 - 4 post-intervention compared to baseline |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Participant must be 18 years at the time of signing the informed consent
A diagnosis of primary (classic and idiopathic) trigeminal neuralgia affecting the mandibular and/or maxillary division, verified by a neurologist
Ability to subclassify the trigeminal neuralgia according to the The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition, i.e. sufficient magnetic resonance (MR) evaluation is mandatory
History of minimum mean of three trigeminal neuralgia related pain paroxysms per day last 4 weeks
History of minimum average daily pain intensity NRS score (ADP) of 4 to10 last 4 weeks
In baseline minimum average daily pain intensity NRS score (ADP) of 4 to 10
In baseline minimum mean of three trigeminal neuralgia related pain paroxysms per day
Treatment refractory as defined in this study as failure to respond, pending an adequate trial in the opinion of the investigator, contraindications or intractable side effect to one of two medications:
Unaltered prophylactic TN medication regime 2 weeks prior to baseline, and be willing to keep regime unaltered during the baseline and the blinded study period.
Be an appropriate candidate for the study intervention required in this study on the basis of the clinical judgment of the investigator
Capable of giving signed informed consent as which includes compliance with the requirements and restrictions listed in the informed consent form (ICF) and in this protocol.
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Irina Aschehoug | Contact | +47 72820972 | irina.aschehoug@ntnu.no |
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| St. Olavs University Hospital | Recruiting | Trondheim | Norway |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D014277 | Trigeminal Neuralgia |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D020433 | Trigeminal Nerve Diseases |
| D005156 | Facial Neuralgia |
| D005155 | Facial Nerve Diseases |
| D009059 | Mouth Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Device |
Stimulation |
|
| 100% responders | Difference in number of complete responders (100% reduction in the mean average daily pain intensity on a NRS score at weeks 3 - 4 post-intervention for paroxysmal pain corresponding to the treated branch compared to baseline) in the active arm versus the sham arm. | Weeks 3 - 4 post-intervention compared to baseline |
| Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) scale responders (a PGI- C responder is defined as having a response of "much improved" or "very much improved" at week 4.) | Difference in number of PGI-C responders corresponding to the treated branch at week 4 in the active arm versus sham arm. | Week 4 |
| Barrow Institute of (BNI- P) responders (a clinically significant response is defined as having BNI I - BNI IIIb at week 4). | Difference in number of clinically significant BNI-P responders at week 4 in the active arm versus sham arm. | Week 4 in the active arm versus sham arm. |
| Barrow Institute of (BNI- P) excellent responders (excellent response is defined as having BNI I - BNI II at week 4). | Difference in number of excellent BNI-P responders at week 4 in the active arm versus sham arm. | Weeks 3 - 4 post-intervention compared to baseline |
| Penn Facial Pain Scale- Revised (PENN-FPS-R) score. | Difference in reduction of PENN-FPS-R from baseline to week 4 in the active arm versus sham arm. | Week 4 post-intervention compared to baseline |
| Change in mean average daily pain intensity NRS score (ADP) in the active versus sham arm. | Difference in reduction mean average daily pain intensity NRS score (ADP) corresponding to the treated branch at weeks 3 - 4 compared to baseline in the active arm versus the sham arm. | Weeks 3 - 4 post-intervention compared to baseline |
| D009057 |
| Stomatognathic Diseases |
| D003389 | Cranial Nerve Diseases |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |