Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Due to COVID 19 declaration in Slovenia for the second time and subsequent reorganization of intervention ward
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| University of Ljubljana | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Background:
Transitions of care often lead to medication errors and unnecessary healthcare utilisation. It has been repeatedly shown that medication reconciliation can at least partially reduce this risk.
Objective:
The aim of this prospective pragmatic trial was to evaluate the effectiveness of pharmacist-led medication reconciliation offered to medical patients as part of routine clinical practise.
The main questions to be answered were:
Participants in the intervention group were offered the following:
Participants in the control group were offered standard care.
Design: pragmatic, prospective, controlled clinical trial
Setting: Five general medical wards at the University Clinic of Respiratory and Allergic Diseases in Slovenia:
Data collection:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intervention Group | Active Comparator | Patients were offered pharmacist- led medication reconciliation on admission and discharge coupled with patient counselling. |
|
| Control Group | No Intervention | Patients received standard care - only written instructions on discharge medications in the discharge letter, according to the standard practice. |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pharmacist-led Medication Reconciliation | Procedure | The best possible medication history (BPMH) at hospital admission was obtained from medical and pharmacy records and by interviewing the patient or carers. The BPMH - an accurate and complete (or as close as possible) list of medications the patient is currently taking - was documented in the medication information system. At hospital admission the BPMH was compared with the therapy in hospital to identify discrepancies. All discrepancies were discussed with the treating physician, unintentional discrepancies were reconciled. Intentional discrepancies were documented in the medical records. Prior to discharge from hospital, the BPMH and the medications planned in the discharge therapy were compared again to ensure that all unintentional discrepancies were corrected. Intentional discrepancies were explained in the discharge letter. Individual patient counselling on discharge medications and pharmacotherapy changes was conducted and coupled with written instructions in lay language. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Unplanned healthcare utilisation within 30 days after discharge | Unplanned healthcare utilisation within 30 days of hospital discharge was defined as any unplanned visit to a general practitioner, specialist, emergency department (ED), or hospitalisation or death. The visits were classified as unplanned, if sudden health problems required medical attention, and planned, if scheduled. Data on mortality due to any reason were also collected 30 days after discharge. For each patient, only the most detrimental outcome was classified. | within 30 (±5) days after hospital discharge |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Serious unplanned healthcare utilisation within 30 days after discharge | Serious unplanned healthcare utilisation were defined as any unplanned ED visit or hospitalisation or death within 30 days from hospital discharge. | within 30 (±5) days after hospital discharge |
| Clinically important medication errors at discharge |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Subsequent exclusion from the analysis:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University Clinic of Respiratory and Allergic Diseases Golnik | Golnik | Select State | 4202 | Slovenia |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 38606174 | Derived | Jost M, Kerec Kos M, Kos M, Knez L. Effectiveness of pharmacist-led medication reconciliation on medication errors at hospital discharge and healthcare utilization in the next 30 days: a pragmatic clinical trial. Front Pharmacol. 2024 Mar 28;15:1377781. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1377781. eCollection 2024. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Pragmatic prospective controlled clinical trial
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
Unintentional discrepancies and undocumented intentional discrepancies between the therapy the patient was taking before admission (BMPH) and the therapy recommended in the discharge letter were defined as medication errors. Their clinical importance was assessed using a 4-point Likert scale ranging from not important, not very important, very important to life-threatening medication errors. Very important and life-threatening medication errors represent clinically important medication errors. |
| On the day of hospital discharge (up to 365 days from hospital admission) |
| Medication discrepancies at 30 days | Medication discrepancies 30 (±5) days after hospital discharge were defined as the discrepancies between the discharge therapy and the therapy the patient was taking 30 (±5) days after hospital discharge. The discrepancies were defined as intentional if the patient intentionally took the therapy differently than recommended in the discharge letter. The reason for the discrepancy was also recorded - the patient's own informed decision or due to instructions from the treating physician (general practitioner, specialist). Unintentional discrepancies were defined as discrepancies from the therapy recommended in the discharge letter of which the patients were unaware. The clinical importance of unintentional discrepancies was assessed using a 4-point Likert scale, ranging from not important, not very important, very important, to life- threatening. | At 30 (±5) days after hospital discharge |
| All healthcare utilisation within 30 days after discharge | Healthcare visits within 30 days of hospital discharge were defined as any visit to a general practitioner, specialist, emergency department (ED), or hospitalisation. These visits were classified as unplanned, if sudden health problems required medical attention, and planned, if scheduled. Data on mortality due to any reason were also collected 30 days after discharge. For each patient, only the most detrimental outcome was classified. | within 30 (±5) days after hospital discharge |