Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Beaumont Hospital | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Pilot study evaluating two different airbag hip protectors to see if community-dwelling older people will wear them and find them comfortable and acceptable.
Traditional hip protectors are specialised pads designed to shield the greater trochanter on (fall) impact. They have uncertain benefits in reducing hip fracture risk and have very poor uptake due to discomfort. Recently, airbag technology has allowed radical change in design and wearability of hip protectors. Despite these airbags being commercially available, there is little evidence of their acceptability/wearability, and as with all hip protectors, virtually no research exists in community-dwelling people. A study of traditional hip protectors found that they may reduce fear of falling (FoF) in community dwellers but activity levels or quality of life were not assessed. A non-randomised study is ongoing of hip airbags on fractures in nursing homes, but none in community dwellers. Two Hip Protectors available in Europe are CE marked as personal protective equipment and approved for sale. There is a need to evaluate their acceptability and usefulness before considering larger clinical trials evaluating their efficacy in preventing hip fractures. This study will evaluate the two hip protectors and gain patient feedback in their use.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Airbag1 | Experimental | Airbag1 worn for two months |
|
| Airbag2 | Experimental | Airbag2 worn for 2 months |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Helite hip protector | Device | hip protector |
| |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Acceptability and useability of a hip protector airbag, qualitative analysis | Tolerance of, and psychosocial impact of wearing a hip protector airbag will be explored through a semi-structured in-depth interview at the end of each 2-month period of wearing the airbag. This will explore significant patterns and themes related to acceptability of each airbag through deductive interview content analysis. | After 2 month period of wearing each airbag |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Acceptability and useability of a hip protector airbag, quantitative measure | SUS (System Usability Scale): The SUS is adapted for the purposes of this study, from similar in the literature and consists of 10 questions each uses a 10 point Likert scale rating factors such as ease of use, charging the device, appearances etc. A high score (100 max score) means highly rated, and 10 (lowest score) means poorly rated. |
Not provided
Inclusion criteria:
Exclusion criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Frances Dockery, MD | Contact | +35318093000 | francesdockery@beaumont.ie |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Frances Dockery, MD | Beaumont Hospital | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beaumont Hospital | Recruiting | Dublin | Ireland |
tbc
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Pilot study of two months, then crossed over to the other for two months
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Wolk hip protector |
| Device |
Hip protectdor |
|
| After 2 months of wearing each device. |
| Fear of falling (FoF) | FoF will be assessed using the FES1 (Falls Efficacy Scale International 1) questionnaire. This uses a 4 point scale for subjective level of concern for 16 questions related to falls and activity. Maximum scores is 64 for highest level of concern or fear of falling. | After 2 months of wearing each device |