RIVACAST : RIVAroxaban Versus Low-molecular Weight Heparinin Patients With Lower Limb Trauma Requiring Brace or CASTing
RIVACAST : RIVAroxaban Versus Low-molecular Weight Heparinin Patients With Lower Limb Trauma Requiring Brace or CASTing
Lower limb trauma requiring immobilization is a very frequent condition that is associated with an increased risk of developing venous thromboembolism (VTE). The TRiP(cast) score has been developed to provide individual VTE risk stratification and help in thromboprophylactic anticoagulation decision. The recent CASTING study had confirmed that patients with a TRiP(cast) score <7 have a very low risk of VTE and could be safely manage without prophylactic treatment. Conversely, patients with a score ≥ 7 have a high-risk of VTE and require a prophylactic anticoagulant treatment. Low molecular weight heparins (LMWH) have been shown to be effective in this indication. However, in the CASTING study, the 3-month symptomatic VTE rate was 2.6% in this subgroup despite LMWH prophylactic treatment. This result suggests that LMWH are not sufficiently effective in this particular subgroup of high-risk patients. Direct oral anticoagulants, and in particular rivaroxaban, may be an effective and safe alternative to LMWH. In the PRONOMOS study, comparing LMWH with rivaroxaban in patients who had undergone non-major lower limb surgery, the relative risk of symptomatic VTE was 0.25 (95% CI = 0.09 - 0.75) in favor of rivaroxaban 10mg. No significant increase in bleeding was found. In addition, as LMWH treatment requires subcutaneous daily injections, the use of rivaroxaban may positively impact patients' quality of life as well as being effective in medico-economic terms.
The aims of this study are to demonstrate that rivaroxaban is at least as effective, easier to use and more efficient than LMWH in patients with trauma to the lower limb requiring immobilisation and deemed to be at risk of venous thromboembolism (TRiP(cast) score ≥ 7). High-risk patients are randomized to receive either rivaroxaban or LMWH. They are followed up at 45 days and 90 days to assess the occurrence of thrombotic events or bleeding, as well as their satisfaction with the treatment received.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Delphine.Douillet@chu-angers.fr0241353637
Cindy.Augereau@chu-angers.fr0241354143
Angers, 49000, France
Delphine.Douillet@chu-angers.fr0241353637
catherine.legall@ch-argenteuil.fr0134232425
caroline.soulie-chavignon@ch-cholet.fr0241496985
rdurif@chu-clermontferrand.fr0473751940
Hiba.boussaha@ch-simoneveil.fr01 34 06 61 15 ext. +33
dviglino@chu-grenoble.fr0476766784
iona.maitre@ght85.fr0251446205
maxime.jonchier@gmail.com0546465050
cyrielle.houalard@gmail.com0243434343
thomas.LAFON@chu-limoges.fr0555056254
karim.tazarourte@chu-lyon.fr0472110040
thibault.markarian@ap-hm.fr0413429700
damien.herve-du-penhoat@ghsif.fr+33164716000
m-sebbane@chu-montpellier.fr0467337974
t.chouihed@chru-nancy.fr0383851496
Francois.JAVAUDIN@chu-nantes.fr0240083333
mathieu.violeau@ch-niort.fr0549783015
anthony.chauvin@aphp.fr0149956565
pierre-clement.thiebaud@aphp.fr0149282743
yonathan.freund@aphp.fr01 42 16 00 00
florence.dumas@aphp.fr0158412707
cgerlier@ghpsj.fr01 44 12 80 23
richard.chocron@gmail.com0156095876
donia.bouzid@aphp.fr0140258080
marion.douplat@chu-lyon.fr0478862854
jeremy.guenezan@chu-poitiers.fr0549444444
Vincent.LEVREL@chu-rennes.fr0299284321
melanie.roussel@chu-rouen.fr0232881879
pierrick.leborgne@chru-strasbourg.fr0388128690
xavier.dubucs@gmail.com0561775919
bertrand.boulanger@ghba.fr+33297014141