A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Cosmetic Outcome of Electrocautery, Scalpel and PEAK PlasmaBlade for Surgical Breast Incisions
A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Cosmetic Outcome of Electrocautery, Scalpel and PEAK PlasmaBlade for Surgical Breast Incisions
This study will compare the cosmetic scar result from the use of scalpel, electrocautery, and pulsed electron avalanche knife (PEAK) PlasmaBlade (PPB) for the initial skin incision for total mastectomy procedures without immediate breast reconstruction.
It is hypothesized that there will be no significant difference in mastectomy scar cosmesis.
The purpose and objectives of this study are:
Scalpel, electrocautery, and PEAK PlasmaBlade (PPB) have all been shown to be safe techniques for surgical incision, but no study has proven the superiority for cosmesis for PPB incision when compared to conventional electrocautery or scalpel.
The investigators propose a double blind prospective randomized controlled study of consecutive patients scheduled for total mastectomy +/- axilla staging without immediate breast reconstruction to evaluate the cosmetic scar result from the use of scalpel, standard electrocautery or PEAK PlasmaBlade.
Scar cosmesis will be evaluated postoperatively at two-to-four weeks, six months, and twelve months by two independent observers blinded to the equipment used, and patient reported outcomes will be reported using the validated SCAR-Q questionnaire.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
cdingee2@providencehealth.bc.ca6048741141 ext. 78609
Vancouver, British Columbia V5T 3N4, Canada
cdingee2@providencehealth.bc.ca6048741141 ext. 78609